Can the Universe create itself?
Open accessAbstract
The question of first-cause has troubled philosophers and cosmologists alike. Now that it is apparent that our universe began in a big bang explosion, the question of what happened before the big bang arises. Inflation seems like a very promising answer, but as Borde and Vilenkin have shown, the inflationary state preceding the big bang could not have been infinite in duration---it must have had a beginning also. Where did it come from? Ultimately, the difficult question seems to be how to make something out of nothing. This paper explores the idea that this is the wrong question---that that is not how the Universe got here. Instead, we explore the idea of whether there is anything in the laws of physics that would prevent the Universe from creating itself. Because spacetimes can be curved and multiply connected, general relativity allows for the possibility of closed timelike curves (CTCs). Thus, tracing backwards in time through the original inflationary state we may eventually encounter a region of CTCs---giving no first-cause. This region of CTCs may well be over by now (being bounded toward the future by a Cauchy horizon). We illustrate that such models---with CTCs---are not necessarily inconsistent by demonstrating self-consistent vacuums for Misner space and a multiply connected de Sitter space in which the renormalized energy-momentum tensor does not diverge as one approaches the Cauchy horizon and solves Einstein's equations. Some specific scenarios (out of many possible ones) for this type of model are described. For example, a metastable vacuum inflates producing an infinite number of (big-bang-type) bubble universes. In many of these, either by natural causes or by action of advanced civilizations, a number of bubbles of metastable vacuum are created at late times by high energy events. These bubbles will usually collapse and form black holes, but occasionally one will tunnel to create an expanding metastable vacuum (a baby universe) on the other side of the black hole's Einstein-Rosen bridge as proposed by Farhi, Guth, and Guven. One of the expanding metastable-vacuum baby universes produced in this way simply turns out to be the original inflating metastable vacuum we began with. We show that a Universe with CTCs can be stable against vacuum polarization. And it can be classically stable and self-consistent if and only if the potentials in this Universe are retarded---which gives a natural explanation of the arrow of time in our universe. Interestingly, the laws of physics may allow the Universe to be its own mother.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper argues that the Universe need not have a first cause or be created from nothing: if general relativity permits closed timelike curves (CTCs), the Universe could be multiply connected and create itself. It constructs self-consistent vacuum examples in Misner space and multiply connected de Sitter space where the renormalized energy-momentum tensor does not diverge at the Cauchy horizon, and argues self-consistency forces retarded potentials and an arrow of time.
Key findings
- In Misner space, the adapted Rindler vacuum gives \(T^\nu_{\ \mu\,R,\mathrm{ren}} = \frac{1}{1440\pi^2\xi^4}\left[(2\pi/b)^4 - 1\right]\mathrm{diag}(-3,1,1,1)\); if \(b=2\pi\), this is zero everywhere and solves the vacuum Einstein equations, while otherwise it diverges as the Cauchy horizon \(\xi\to0\) is approached.
- In multiply connected de Sitter space \(dS/B\), the adapted conformal Rindler vacuum gives \(T^\nu_{\ \mu\,CR,\mathrm{ren}} = \frac{1}{1440\pi^2 r_0^4(1-r^2/r_0^2)^2}\left[(2\pi r_0/\beta)^4 - 1\right]\mathrm{diag}(-3,1,1,1) - \frac{1}{960\pi^2 r_0^4}\delta^\nu_\mu\); if \(\beta=2\pi r_0\), then \(T_{ab\,CR,\mathrm{ren}} = -g_{ab}/(960\pi^2 r_0^4)\), regular and self-consistent when \(r_0^2 = \frac{3}{2\Lambda}\left(1 \pm \sqrt{1-\Lambda/(270\pi)}\right)\).
- Self-consistency near the Cauchy horizon requires retarded potentials in region \(F\), advanced potentials in region \(P\), and anti-correlated retarded/advanced choices in \(R\) and \(L\); this naturally produces an arrow of time and entropy, with \(R,L\) cold and \(F,P\) hot. Particle detectors in \(R\) see nothing, while in \(F\) they see Gibbons-Hawking radiation with \(T_{G-H}=1/(2\pi r_0)\), plus grey-body corrections near the Cauchy horizon.
- Baby-universe scenarios can make the Universe its own mother: Farhi-Guth-Guven tunneling has probability \(P=10^{-10^{18}}\) for typical GUT scales; bubble percolation requires \(5.8\times10^{-9}<\epsilon_{\rm cr}<0.24\), and for \(b=2\pi\), \(\tau_0\simeq0.086r_0\), \(V_{II}\simeq0.011V_I\), \(P_{II}\simeq0.011P_I\), with \(\epsilon<2\times10^{-3}\) for less than a 5% chance of a bubble in \(V_I\).
Methods
- Theoretical study in general relativity and quantum field theory in curved spacetime; no new observational data are presented, though observational constraints on \(\Omega\), \(h\), and inflation are cited.
- Constructs multiply connected spacetimes—Misner space and a multiply connected de Sitter space \(dS/B\)—by topological identifications/boost transformations, then uses the method of images to compute Hadamard and Wightman functions, renormalized energy-momentum tensors, and particle-detector response functions.
- Checks divergence at Cauchy horizons, solves semiclassical Einstein equations for self-consistent vacua, uses the conformal relation between multiply connected de Sitter space and Misner space to transplant results, and analyzes classical stability via \(T_{ab}T^{ab}\) for electromagnetic pulses and photon collisions.
Limitations
- Stated: there is no quantum theory of gravity or theory-of-everything, so the chronology protection conjecture cannot be settled and the Hawking vs. Kim-Thorne dispute cannot be judged; the simplest solutions are not geodesically complete to the past; further research is needed for a self-consistent vacuum in the time-nonorientable antipodal model; whether Cassidy and Hawking’s entropy conclusion holds generally remains open.
- Stated: many problems remain, and the paper does not prove the chronology protection conjecture false; it relies on self-consistency arguments and assumptions about bubble formation, absorption, and the absence of real particles crossing Cauchy horizons.
- Evident from the text: the work is purely theoretical and proposes no direct observational test; scenarios involving advanced civilizations creating baby universes and the associated probabilities are speculative, and some conclusions depend on exponentially small tunneling rates and specific vacuum choices.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 236 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning
A Universe with CTCs can be stable against vacuum polarization.
“We show that a Universe with CTCs can be stable against vacuum polarization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
A Universe with CTCs can be classically stable and self-consistent if and only if the potentials in this Universe are retarded.
“And, it can be classically stable and self-consistent if and only if the potentials in this Universe are retarded -which gives a natural explanation of the arrow of time in our universe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Self-consistent vacuums exist for a multiply connected de Sitter space in which the renormalized energy-momentum tensor does not diverge as one approaches the Cauchy horizon and solves Einstein's equations.
“We illustrate that such modelswith CTCs -are not necessarily inconsistent by demonstrating self-consistent vacuums for Misner space and a multiply connected de Sitter space in which the renormalized energy-momentum tensor does not diverge as one approaches the Cauchy horizon and solves Einstein's equations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Self-consistent vacuums exist for Misner space in which the renormalized energy-momentum tensor does not diverge as one approaches the Cauchy horizon and solves Einstein's equations.
“We illustrate that such modelswith CTCs -are not necessarily inconsistent by demonstrating self-consistent vacuums for Misner space and a multiply connected de Sitter space in which the renormalized energy-momentum tensor does not diverge as one approaches the Cauchy horizon and solves Einstein's equations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For a multiply connected de Sitter space there also exists a self-consistent vacuum state for a conformally coupled scalar field.
“In this paper, we find that for a multiply connected de Sitter space there also exists a self-consistent vacuum state for a conformally coupled scalar field (see section IX).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingreasoning
The conformal relations given by Eq. (79) and Eq. (80) define a conformal map between static de Sitter space and Rindler space.
“The conformal relations given by Eq. ( 79) and Eq. ( 80) define a conformal map between the static de Sitter space and the Rindler space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In region P of Misner space, the only self-consistent potential is the advanced potential.
“Similarly, in region P the only self-consistent potential is the advanced potential (see Fig. 6a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
For any finite boost parameter b, the energy-momentum tensor of the adapted Minkowski vacuum in Misner space diverges as one approaches the Cauchy horizon (ξ → 0).
“Obviously for any finite b, T ν µ M,ren diverges as one approaches the Cauchy horizon (ξ → 0).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
A particle detector in Vilenkin's tunneling universe has the same response function as an inertial particle detector in an eternal de Sitter space.
“We find that the integration of the second term is zero and therefore, the result is the same as that for an inertial particle detector in an eternal de Sitter space [100,153].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [100]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [153]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
In the time-nonorientable de Sitter space, the contribution of G_CM(-X,X') to the energy-momentum tensor is zero.
“Inserting Eq. ( 57) and Eq. ( 58) into Eq.( 45), we find that the contribution of G CM (-X, X ′ ) to the energy-momentum tensor is zero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
For the time-nonorientable de Sitter space, the area of the event horizon is one half that of an eternal de Sitter space.
“For this time-nonorientable de Sitter space, the area of the event horizon is one half that of an eternal de Sitter space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
A particle detector moving in Misner space with the adapted Rindler vacuum along the specified geodesic cannot be excited and detects nothing.
“Therefore such a detector cannot be excited and so it detects nothing [30].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
In region R of Misner space, a part-retarded-and-part-advanced potential is not self-consistent.
“Therefore in region R both the retarded and the advanced potential are self-consistent, but the part-retarded-and-part-advanced potential is not self-consistent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Inserting Eq. (27) into Eq. (88) and using Eqs. (79-83), one obtains the energy-momentum tensor of a conformally coupled scalar field in the adapted conformal Minkowski vacuum in dS/B, given by Eq. (93).
“Inserting Eq. ( 27) into Eq.( 88), and using Eqs.(79-83), we obtain the energy-momentum tensor of a conformally coupled scalar field in the adapted conformal Minkowski vacuum in our multiply connected de Sitter space dS/B.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The renormalized energy-momentum tensor in the time-nonorientable de Sitter space is the same as that in an eternal de Sitter space, given by Eq. (49).
“Therefore the renormalized energy-momentum tensor is the same as that in an eternal de Sitter space, which is given by Eq. ( 49).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
dS/B is not a manifold at the two-sphere defined by W = V = 0 and X^2 + Y^2 + Z^2 = r0^2.
“Similar to the case of Misner space, dS/B is not a manifold at the two-sphere defined by W = V = 0 and X 2 + Y 2 + Z 2 = r 2 0 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The semiclassical Einstein equations are satisfied if and only if Λ - 3/r0^2 + 1/(120π r0^4) = 0.
“we find that the semiclassical Einstein's equations are satisfied if and only if Λ - 3 r 2 0 + 1 120πr 4 0 = 0. (91 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The energy-momentum tensor of a conformally coupled scalar field in the adapted Minkowski vacuum in Vilenkin's tunneling universe is T_ab^ren = -1/(960π2 r_04) g_ab, the same as for an eternal de Sitter space.
“Therefore, the energy-momentum tensor of a conformally coupled scalar field in the adapted Minkowski vacuum in Vilenkin's tunneling universe is T ab ren = - 1 960π 2 r 4 0 g ab ,(49) which is the same as that for an eternal de Sitter space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
For a conformally coupled scalar field in the conformal Minkowski vacuum in a simply connected de Sitter space, T_ab^ren = -1/(960π^2 r0^4) g_ab.
“Since the renormalized energy-momentum tensor for Minkowski space in the Minkowski vacuum is zero, we have T b a ren = 0, and thus for a conformally coupled scalar field in the conformal Minkowski vacuum in a simply connected de Sitter space dS T ab ren = - 1 960π 2 r 4 0 g ab ,(89)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
A particle detector moving in the multiply connected Minkowski spacetime with the adapted Minkowski vacuum perceives no particles, even though the renormalized energy-momentum tensor has the form of radiation.
“Such a particle detector perceives no particles, though the renormalized energy-momentum tensor of the field has the form of radiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The results obtained by doing quantum field theory in the Euclidean section and analytically extending to the Lorentzian section are the same as those obtained with the method of images.
“The results are the same as that obtained with the method of images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The response functions for detectors on worldlines with constant ξ, y, and z in Misner space with the adapted Rindler vacuum are zero.
“We [30] have also calculated the response functions for detectors on worldlines with constant ξ, y, and z and worldlines with constant ξ, y, and z -both are zero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
The static coordinates defined by Eq. (63) only cover region R of de Sitter space.
“It is obvious that the static coordinates defined by Eq. ( 63) only cover region R.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
With the above conformal transformation, Misner space is naturally transformed to the multiply connected de Sitter space dS/B with β = br0.
“With the above conformal transformation, Misner space is naturally transformed to the multiply connected de Sitter space dS/B with β = br 0 . (83 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In region F of Misner space, the only self-consistent potential is the retarded potential.
“The only self-consistent potential in region F is the retarded potential.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
As L → 1 (approaching the Cauchy horizon), the n ≠ 0 contribution tends to zero; thus as the Cauchy horizon is approached from region F, the detector comoving in the steady-state coordinate system perceives pure Hawking radiation with Gibbons-Hawking temperature.
“As L → 1 (approaching the Cauchy horizon), we also have d dT n =0 F n → 0. Thus as the Cauchy horizon is approached from the side of region F , the particle detector comoving in the steady-state coordinate system perceives pure Hawking radiation with Gibbons-Hawking temperature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The multiply connected de Sitter space dS/B is constructed by identifying points (V,W,X,Y,Z) with (V cosh nb + W sinh nb, W cosh nb + V sinh nb, X,Y,Z) on de Sitter space.
“Similar to Misner space, our multiply connected de Sitter space is constructed by identifying points (V, W, X, Y, Z) with (V cosh nb + W sinh nb, W cosh nb + V sinh nb, X, Y, Z) on de Sitter space dS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
If Λ = 0, the solutions to Eq. (91) are r0 = (360π)^(-1/2) and r0 = ∞.
“If Λ = 0, the solutions to Eq. ( 91) are r 0 = (360π) -1/2 and r 0 = ∞ [89].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
At the intersection of two light cones in multiply connected de Sitter space, the maximum value of T_ab T^ab is at the points with θ = 0 or θ = π.
“At the intersection of two light cones in multiply connected de Sitter space, it is easy to show that the maximum value of T ab T ab is at the points with θ = 0 or θ = π on the intersection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
A particle detector moving along a geodesic with χ, θ, φ = constants in the time-nonorientable de Sitter space has response function dF/dT = r_0/(2π) ∆E/(e^{πr_0∆E}-1), representing a thermal spectrum with temperature twice the Gibbons-Hawking temperature.
“Inserting this into Eq.( 17) we get dF dT = r 0 2π ∆E e πr0∆E -1 ,(60) which represents a thermal spectrum with a temperature equal to twice the Gibbons-Hawking temperature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In Vilenkin's tunneling universe, the boundary condition ∂φ/∂τ|Σ = 0 does not produce any renormalized energy-momentum tensor.
“Substituting Eqs.(42)(43)(44) and Eq. ( 47) into Eq.( 45), we find that lim X ′ →X D ab ′ G (1) CM (X -, X ′ ) = 0, which shows that the boundary condition (40) does not produce any renormalized energy-momentum tensor; but the action of”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In Misner space, T_ab T^ab is zero everywhere except at the intersection of two light cones.
“From the above discussion of T ab T ab in Misner space, we know that T ab T ab is zero everywhere except at the intersection of two light cones.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The static coordinates can be extended to region F by the complex transformation given in Eq. (69).
“However, similar to the Rindler coordinates, these static coordinates can be extended to region F by the complex transformation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
For the adapted Rindler vacuum in Misner space, unless b = 2π, the energy-momentum tensor blows up as one approaches the Cauchy horizon.
“We [30] have found that unless b = 2π, T ν µ R,ren blows up as one approaches the Cauchy horizon (ξ → 0) (as also does T µν R,ren T µν R,ren ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
In region F of Misner space, any part-retarded-and-part-advanced potential is not self-consistent.
“It is easy to see that any part-retarded-and-part-advanced potential is also not self-consistent in F.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Region R, which is multiply connected, has a finite four-volume V_I = (4/3)π b r0^4, where b = β/r0 and β is the de Sitter boost parameter.
“Region R (for its fundamental cell see Fig. 4) which is multiply connected has a finite four-volume V I = 4 3 πbr 4 0 (here b = β/r 0 , β is the de Sitter boost parameter).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The total probability of forming a bubble in V_II is P_II = (4/3)π b ε (cosh^3(τ0/r0) - 1).
“The total probability of forming a bubble in V II is P II = 4 3 πbǫ(cosh 3 τ0 r0 -1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Taking L to be the Hubble radius at the recombination epoch (∼10^23 cm), the maximum metric fluctuation is (δg μν)max ∼ 10^-76.
“If we take L to be the Hubble radius at the recombination epoch (∼ 10 23 cm), we have (δg µν ) max ∼ 10 -76 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
With retarded potentials in region R, T_ab T^ab does not diverge as the Cauchy horizon separating R from P is approached from the R side, indicating no instability.
“But, as we have shown, with retarded potentials in R, T ab T ab does not diverge as the Cauchy horizon separating R from P is approached from the R side, indicating no instability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The condition τ > τ0 is also sufficient for a bubble formed in F not to collide with itself.
“In fact this is also a sufficient condition, which can be shown by the conformal mapping between region F in the multiply connected de Sitter space and region F-O in Misner space defined by Eqs.(81)(82)(83).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The 0 < τ < τ0 part of the fundamental cell in F has a finite four-volume V_II = V_I (cosh^3(τ0/r0) - 1).
“The 0 < τ < τ 0 part of the fundamental cell in F has a finite four-volume V II = V I (cosh 3 τ0 r0 -1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The models considered so far have all obeyed the weak energy condition.
“The models considered so far have all obeyed the weak energy condition, and these models have all been multiply connected; in other words, they have a genus of 1, like a donut, since one of the later baby universes is connected with the original one.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
These two future light cones are identified creating a periodic boundary condition for the causally connected region F + R.
“These two future light cones are identified creating a periodic boundary condition for the causally connected region F + R.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
T_ab^ren remains formally ill-defined on the Cauchy horizon itself (ξ=0 in Eq. (32) with b=2π), a set of measure zero.
“It's true that T ab ren remains formally ill-defined on the Cauchy horizon itself [ξ = 0 in Eq. ( 32) with b = 2π], a set of measure zero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Our multiply connected de Sitter space is divided into four regions R, L, F, and P, which are separated by Cauchy horizons CH.
“Our multiply connected de Sitter space is divided into four regions R, L, F, and P, which are separated by Cauchy horizons CH.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In F the retarded potential is self-consistent.
“This diagram shows that in F the retarded potential is self-consistent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
When analyzing classical fields in this model, the only self-consistent solution without a blow up as the Cauchy horizon is approached occurs when there is a pure retarded potential in the causally connected region of the model.
“When analyzing classical fields in this model, the only self-consistent solution without a blow up as the Cauchy horizon is approached occurs when there is a pure retarded potential in the causally connected region of the model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Likewise the advanced potential in region P would not destroy the Cauchy horizon.
“Likewise the advanced potential in region P would not destroy the Cauchy horizon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
If the boost b = 2π, there exists a Rindler-type vacuum for Misner space in which the renormalized energy-momentum tensor does not blow up as the Cauchy horizon is approached but produces a cosmological constant throughout spacetime that self-consistently solves Einstein's equations for this geometry.
“If the boost b = 2π, we show that we can find a Rindler-type vacuum where the renormalized energy-momentum tensor does not blow up as the Cauchy horizon is approached but rather produces a cosmological constant throughout the spacetime which self-consistently solves Einstein's equations for this geometry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
The models considered so far have all been multiply connected with genus 1.
“The models considered so far have all obeyed the weak energy condition, and these models have all been multiply connected; in other words, they have a genus of 1, like a donut, since one of the later baby universes is connected with the original one.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A treatment in the Euclidean section shows that if b=2π, T_ab^ren=0 everywhere, including at ξ=0.
“In fact, a treatment in the Euclidean section shows this is the case, for in the Euclidean section, if b = 2π, T ab ren = 0 everywhere, including at ξ = 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
This tiny oscillating universe has a small but non-zero probability to tunnel through the barrier out to become a de Sitter-type inflating universe.
“This tiny oscillating universe has a small but non-zero probability to tunnel through the barrier out to become a de Sitter-type inflating universe”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The solution of the Euclidean Einstein's equations representing the tunneling regime (open circle) in Fig. 2 is a solution to the Euclidean Einstein's equations with a positive cosmological constant and a conformally coupled scalar field in its ground state.
“The solution of the Euclidean Einstein's equations representing the tunneling regime (open circle) in Fig. 2.This is a solution to the Euclidean Einstein's equations with a positive cosmological constant and a conformally coupled scalar field in its ground state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
A retarded potential in R and an advanced potential in L (or vice versa) are self-consistent.
“This diagram shows that a retarded potential in R and an advanced potential in L (or vice versa) are self-consistent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The collision of an electromagnetic wave with its images cannot destroy the Cauchy horizon, since the proper time from the collision (event p) to the origin is always bigger than the proper time from E to the origin.
“The “collision” of an electromagnetic wave with its images cannot destroy the Cauchy horizon, since the proper time from the “collision” (event p) to the origin is always bigger than the proper time from E to the origin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The adapted Rindler vacuum for Misner space has T_ab^ren = 0 throughout the space if b = 2π.
“But as we have shown [30], the adapted Rindler vacuum for Misner space has T ab ren = 0 throughout the space if b = 2π”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
The simplest solutions we have obtained so far are not geodesically complete to the past.
“Perhaps the most obvious problem with the model we have proposed is that the simplest solutions we have obtained so far are not geodesically complete to the past.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The region of CTCs has a finite four-volume equal to 4πbr^4_0/3.
“The region of CTCs has a finite four-volume equal to 4πbr 4 0 /3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The advanced potential in F is not self-consistent, since the collision of an electromagnetic wave with its images will destroy the Cauchy horizon.
“This diagram shows that the advanced potential in F is not self-consistent, since the collision of an electromagnetic wave with its images will destroy the Cauchy horizon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The left dark disk is a tiny radiation-dominated closed oscillating universe, which oscillates between Big Bangs and Big Crunches.
“The left dark disk is a tiny radiation-dominated closed oscillating universe, which oscillates between Big Bangs and Big Crunches.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
This is a Euclidean space bouncing between the state with maximum radius a2 and the state with (non-zero) minimum radius a1.
“This is a Euclidean space bouncing between the state with maximum radius a2 and the state with (non-zero) minimum radius a1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
If the boost b = 2π, we show that we can find a Rindler-type vacuum where the renormalized energy-momentum tensor does not blow up.
“If the boost b = 2π, we show that we can find a Rindler-type vacuum where the renormalized energy-momentum tensor does not”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The early universe contained a region of CTCs.
- Findingnone given
A part-advanced-and-part-retarded potential in R (or L) is also not self-consistent, as T_ab would also diverge as the Cauchy horizon is approached.
“This diagram shows that a part-advanced-and-part-retarded potential in R (or L) is also not self-consistent, as T ab T ab would also diverge as the Cauchy horizon is approached.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The metastable de Sitter phase decays along a hyperboloid H3 near the bottom of the figure to form a single open bubble universe with a hot Big Bang phase and an epoch of recombination.
“The metastable de Sitter phase is shown in grey.It decays along a hyperboloid H 3 near the bottom of the figure to form a single open bubble universe with a hot Big Bang phase and an epoch of recombination which is also shown.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The de Sitter bubble expands forever.
“The de Sitter bubble expands forever.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
After CH, there are no CTCs.
“After CH, there are no CTCs.”
- Also stated in: § FIG. 3. (a) · plain
“After CH there are no CTCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § FIG. 3. (a) · plain
- Findingnone given
In this model the closed null curves generating the Cauchy horizon (CH) pass through a hot Big Bang region.
“In this model the closed null curves generating the Cauchy horizon (CH) pass through a hot Big Bang region”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
This reaches a point of maximum expansion at which point it tunnels to a doorknob-shaped configuration.
“This reaches a point of maximum expansion at which point it tunnels to a doorknob-shaped configuration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A super-civilization can create an expanding bubble of de Sitter metastable vacuum.
- Interpretationreasoning
Even a short run of inflation, of 67 e-folding times or more, is sufficient to explain why the universe is as large as it is observed to be.
“Thus, even a short run of inflation, of 67 e-folding times or more, is sufficient to explain why the universe is as large as it is observed to be.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The inflationary state preceding the Big Bang could not have been infinite in duration; it must have had a beginning also.
“as Borde and Vilenkin have shown, the inflationary state preceding the Big Bang could not have been infinite in duration -it must have had a beginning also.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Borde and Vilenkin
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Hawking and Penrose proved singularity theorems showing that, with reasonable constraints on the energy-momentum tensor, if Einstein's equations are correct and the expansion of the universe is as observed today, there is no way to avoid an initial singularity.
“Hawking and Penrose proved a number of singularity theorems [48,49,40] showing that, with some reasonable constraints on the energy-momentum tensor, if Einstein's equations are correct and the expansion of the universe is as observed today, there is no way to avoid an initial singularity in the model; that is, initial singularities would form even in models that were not exactly uniform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [48]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [49]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [40]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Inflation also gives a natural explanation for why the observed radius of curvature of the universe is so large.
“Inflation also gives a natural explanation for why the observed radius of curvature of the universe is so large (a ≥ cH -1 0 ≃ 3000h -1 Mpc; here H 0 = 100h km s -1 Mpc -1 is the Hubble constant).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If one of those later inflating pieces simply turns out to be the inflating piece that one started out with, then the Universe can be its own mother.
“If one of those later inflating pieces simply turns out to be the inflating piece that one started out with, then the Universe can be its own mother.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
All three Friedmann models (k = 0, k = 1, and k = -1) that were expanding at the present epoch had a beginning in the finite past.
“But now there was a problem: all three Friedmann models (k = 0, k = 1, and k = -1) that were expanding at the present epoch had a beginning in the finite past (see e.g.[39,40]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [39]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [40]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Li and Gott found that the self-consistent vacuum in Misner space is the adapted Rindler vacuum.
“Li and Gott [30] have found that it is the “adapted” Rindler vacuum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
A little piece of inflationary state expands to produce a large volume of inflationary state, little pieces of which resemble the starting piece.
“A little piece of inflationary state expands to produce a large volume of inflationary state, little pieces of which resemble the starting piece.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The inflationary power spectrum with CDM has been amazingly successful in explaining the qualitative features of observed galaxy clustering.
“The inflationary power spectrum with CDM has been amazingly successful in explaining the qualitative features of observed galaxy clustering (cf.[73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 10 sources checked- cites [73]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [74]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [75]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [76]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [77]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [78]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [79]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [81]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [82]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The laws of physics may allow the Universe to be its own mother.
“Interestingly, the laws of physics may allow the Universe to be its own mother.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The early universe contains a region of CTCs.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The probability of a particular multiple connection forming is not exactly zero.
- Rests on an assumption: An infinite number of baby universes are created.
- Premisecitation
The observed Zeldovich-Peebles-Yu-Harrison fluctuation spectrum with index n = 1 has been naturally predicted as the result of random quantum fluctuations.
“Another success of inflation is that the observed Zeldovich-Peebles-Yu-Harrison fluctuation spectrum with index n = 1 [66][67][68] has been naturally predicted as the result of random quantum fluctuations [69][70][71][72].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 7 sources checked- cites [66]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [67]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [68]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [69]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [70]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [71]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [72]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Guth's proposal of inflation offered an explanation of why the initial conditions in the Big Bang should be approximately, but not exactly uniform.
“Guth's proposal of inflation [54] offered an explanation of why the initial conditions in the Big Bang should be approximately, but not exactly uniform.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Inflation is well suited to reproducing conditions as they were earlier.
“Interestingly, inflation is well suited to this.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
General relativity allows for the possibility of closed timelike curves (CTCs).
“A remarkable property of general relativity is that it allows solutions that have closed timelike curves (CTCs) [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] (for review see [9,10]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 9 sources checked- cites [2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [4]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [7]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [9]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
There is the possibility of forming baby universes at late times where new pieces of inflating states are formed.
“Also there is the possibility of forming baby universes at late times where new pieces of inflating states are formed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [32]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [33]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [34]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [35]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
In the Friedmann models the universe began in a singularly dense state at a finite time in the past.
“In the Friedmann models the universe began in a singularly dense state at a finite time in the past.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Linde and Mezhlmian showed there are reasonable potentials which could produce bubble universes with different values of Ω.
“Linde and Mezhlmian [107,108] have shown how there are reasonable potentials which could produce such bubble universes with different values of Ω.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [107]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [108]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Borde and Vilenkin have proved that if the Universe were infinitely old (i.e., if the de Sitter space were complete) then the bubbles would percolate immediately and inflation would never get started.
“Borde and Vilenkin have proved that if the Universe were infinitely old (i.e., if the de Sitter space were complete) then the bubbles would percolate immediately and inflation would never get started (see [126,127] and references cited therein).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [126]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [127]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Light from events within the future light cone of E' never reaches events inside the future light cone of E.
“Light from events within the future light cone of E ′ never reaches events inside the future light cone of E.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Turner and Fukugita, Futamase, and Kasai showed that a flat ΩΛ=1 model produces about 10 times as many gravitational lenses as a flat model with Ω=1.
“Turner [119] and Fukugita, Futamase, and Kasai [120] showed that a flat Ω Λ = 1 model produces about 10 times as many gravitational lenses as a flat model with Ω = 1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [119]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [120]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In order that there be a greater than 5% chance that no bubble should have collided with our bubble by now, so as to be visible in our past light cone, ε < 0.01 for Ω = 0.4, Λ = 0, h = 0.63 today.
“In order that there be a greater than 5% chance that no bubble should have collided with our bubble by now, so as to be visible in our past light cone, ǫ < 0.01 for Ω = 0.4, Λ = 0, h = 0.63 today [88], but this is no problem since we expect tunneling probabilities through a barrier to be exponentially small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In a standard chaotic inflationary potential V(φ), one could build in a bump so that one would randomly walk to the top via quantum fluctuations and then roll down until lodged behind the bump in a metastable local minimum.
“In a standard chaotic inflationary potential V (φ) [109], one could simply build in a bump, so that one would randomly walk to the top of the curve via quantum fluctuations and then roll down till one lodged behind the bump in a metastable local minimum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [109]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Gott has shown how an open inflationary model might be produced.
“Gott [89] has shown how an open inflationary model might be produced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The amount of large scale power seen in the observations suggests an inflationary CDM power spectrum with 0.2 < Ωh < 0.3.
“The amount of large scale power seen in the observations suggests an inflationary CDM power spectrum with 0.2 < Ωh < 0.3 [83][84][85][86][87][88].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 6 sources checked- cites [83]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [84]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [85]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [86]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [87]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [88]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Since the number of bubbles forming increases exponentially with time without limit, our universe is expected to form at a finite but arbitrarily large time after the beginning of the inflationary state.
“Since the number of bubbles forming increases exponentially with time without limit, our universe is expected to form at a finite but arbitrarily large time after the beginning of the inflationary state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Borde and Vilenkin have proved that in the inflationary scenario the universe must have a beginning.
“Thus Borde and Vilenkin have proved that in the inflationary scenario the universe must have a beginning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
However, this point is still the earliest point in Euclidean time since it is at the center of the hemisphere specified by the Euclidean boundary at V=0.
“However, this point is still the earliest point in Euclidean time since it is at the center of the hemisphere specified by the Euclidean boundary at V = 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Thus, the universe should have a microwave background that is isotropic, except for small quantum fluctuations.
“Thus, the universe should have a microwave background that is isotropic, except for small quantum fluctuations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
With ΩB h^2=0.0125, the Ω=1, ΩΛ=0 model power spectrum reaches its peak value at l=200.
“With Ω B h 2 = 0.0125, the Ω = 1, Ω Λ = 0 model power spectrum reaches its peak value at l = 200”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [122]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
There would be a fine tuning of parameters needed to produce the observed results.
“So there would be what is called a “fine tuning of parameters” needed to produce the observed results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
This model has an event horizon, which is the future light cone of an event E' antipodal to E.
“This model has an event horizon, which is the future light cone of an event E ′ (W = -r 0 , X = 0, Y = 0, Z = 0, V = 0) which is antipodal to E.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Inflation is thus eternal to the future.
“Inflation is thus eternal to the future [128][129][130][131].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [128]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [129]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [130]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
If there were 670 e-folds or 670 million e-folds, then Ω currently would be only slightly less than 1.
“If there were 670 e-folds or 670 million e-folds, then Ω currently would be only slightly less than 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Models with low Ω but Ω+ΩΛ=1 are also acceptable.
“Models with low Ω but Ω + Ω Λ = 1 are also acceptable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
If Ω is too small, no galaxies will form.
“since if Ω is too small, no galaxies will form [110].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [110]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
These things have forced even enthusiasts of k=0 models to move to models with Ω<1 and a cosmological constant so that Ω+ΩΛ=1 and k=0.
“These things have forced even enthusiasts of k = 0 models to move to models with Ω < 1 and a cosmological constant so that Ω + Ω Λ = 1 and k = 0 [118].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [118]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
These calculations allow predictions of fluctuations in the microwave background.
“This allows predictions of fluctuations in the microwave background.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
An Ω=0.3, ΩΛ=0.7 model reaches its peak value also at l=200.
“an Ω = 0.3, Ω Λ = 0.7 model reaches its peak value also at l = 200 [122]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [122]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Ages of globular cluster stars have a 2σ lower limit of about 11.6 billion years.
“Ages of globular cluster stars have a 2σ lower limit of about 11.6 billion years [115]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
One has to produce a particular amount of inflation, approximately 67 e-folds.
“Because one has to produce a particular amount of inflation, approximately 67 e-folds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Ratra and Peebles showed how to calculate quantum fluctuations in the H^3 hyperbolic geometry with a(t)=r0 sinh(t/r0) during the inflationary epoch inside the bubble in the single-bubble model.
“Ratra and Peebles [102,103] have shown how to calculate quantum fluctuations in the H 3 hyperbolic geometry with a(t) = r 0 sinh(t/r 0 ) during the inflationary epoch inside the bubble in the single bubble model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [102]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [103]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- The authors state this as an assumption: For the rest of the paper, the authors assume single-bubble open inflationary models for our Big Bang universe.
- Interpretationcitation
With a myriad of open universes being created, anthropic arguments come into play.
“With a myriad of open universes being created, anthropic arguments [62] come into play”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
From inside one of the bubbles, our view could be isotropic.
“But, from inside one of the bubbles, our view could be isotropic [89].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Extreme-Λ dominated models are ruled out by producing too many gravitational lenses.
“Thus, extreme-Λ dominated models are ruled out by producing too many gravitational lenses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
So we are surrounded by an event horizon.
“So we are surrounded by an event horizon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The bubble formation rate per unit four volume r0^4 is expected to be exponentially small so the bubbles do not percolate.
“The bubble formation rate per unit four volume r 4 0 is thus expected to be exponentially small so the bubbles do not percolate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The authors assume an initial metastable vacuum which decays by forming bubbles through barrier penetration.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The bubble formation rate per unit four volume r0^4 is ε≪1.
- Premisecitation
A variety of observational samples and methods have suggested 0.2<Ωh<0.3.
“A variety of observational samples and methods have suggested this: counts in cells, angular covariance function on the sky, power spectrum analysis of 3D samples, and finally topological analysis, all showing that 0.2 < Ωh < 0.3 [82][83][84][85][86][87][88].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [82]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [83]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [84]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Coleman and de Luccia showed that if a metastable symmetric vacuum with positive cosmological constant Λ were to decay by tunneling directly through a barrier to reach the current vacuum with a zero cosmological constant, then it would do this by forming a bubble of low-density vacuum of radius σ around an event E.
“Coleman and de Luccia [93] showed that if a metastable symmetric vacuum (with the Higgs field φ = 0), with positive cosmological constant Λ were to decay by tunneling directly through a barrier to reach the current vacuum with a zero cosmological constant (where the Higgs field φ = φ 0 ), then it would do this by forming a bubble of low-density vacuum of radius σ around an event E.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [93]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
An Ω=0.4, ΩΛ=0 model reaches its peak value at l=350.
“while an Ω = 0.4, Ω Λ = 0 model reaches its peak value at l = 350 [123].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [123]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Studies of large scale structure have shown that with the inflationary CDM power spectrum, the standard Ω=1, h=0.5 model simply does not have enough power at large scales.
“Also, studies of large scale structure have shown that with the inflationary CDM power spectrum, the standard Ω = 1, h = 0.5 model simply does not have enough power at large scales.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In order that inflation proceeds and the bubbles do not percolate, it is required that the probability of forming a bubble in de Sitter space per four volume r0^4 is ε < ε_cr where 5.8×10^-9 < ε_cr < 0.24.
“In order that inflation proceeds and the bubbles do not percolate, it is required that the probability of forming a bubble in de Sitter space per four volume r 4 0 is ǫ < ǫ cr where 5.8 × 10 -9 < ǫ cr < 0.24 [95].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [95]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
This implies that there must be 'something' instead of 'nothing' before tunneling.
“This implies that there must be “something” instead of “nothing” before tunneling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Li has shown that in this spacetime the energy-momentum tensor is finite everywhere.
“Li [23] has shown that in this spacetime the energymomentum tensor is finite everywhere.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Cassidy and Hawking's results cannot be extended to the Cauchy horizon.
“In other words, Cassidy and Hawking's results [143] cannot be extended to the Cauchy horizon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [143]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The divergence of the effective action may imply that the effective action is not a good tool as the polarized hypersurfaces are approached.
“The divergence of the effective action may imply that the effective action is not a good tool as the polarized hypersurfaces are approached.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Without appeal to quantum gravity, counter-examples to the chronology protection conjecture also exist.
“Without appeal to quantum gravity, counter-examples to the chronology protection conjecture also exist.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Vilenkin obtained his tunneling universe by choosing a so-called 'tunneling boundary condition' for the Wheeler-DeWitt equation.
“Vilenkin obtained his tunneling universe by choosing a so-called “tunneling boundary condition” for the Wheeler-DeWitt equation [135,136].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [135]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [136]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Visser has generalized Thorne's result to the Roman-ring case.
“Recently Visser [29] has generalized this result to the Roman-ring case.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
If quantum gravity effects are considered (e.g. in quantum cosmology), they can be separated by a complex geometric region (as a quantum barrier) instead of a Cauchy horizon.
“But if quantum gravity effects are considered (e.g. in quantum cosmology), they can be separated by a complex geometric region (as a quantum barrier) instead of a Cauchy horizon [22].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In the path integral approach to quantum cosmology, complex geometries are required in order to make the path integral convergent and to overcome the difficulty that in general situations a Euclidean space cannot be directly joined to a Lorentzian space.
“(In the path integral approach to quantum cosmology, complex geometries are required in order to make the path integral convergent and to overcome the difficulty that in general situations a Euclidean space cannot be directly joined to a Lorentzian space [141]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Boulware and Tanaka and Hiscock have found that for sufficiently massive fields in Gott space and Grant space respectively, the energy-momentum tensor remains regular on the Cauchy horizon.
“Boulware [21] and Tanaka and Hiscock [25] have found that for sufficiently massive fields in Gott space [8,142] and Grant space [18] respectively, the energy-momentum tensor remains regular on the Cauchy horizon.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [25]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
His 'tunneling from nothing' boundary condition demands that when the universe is big (a^2 Λ/3 > 1) there is only an outgoing wave in the superspace.
“His “tunneling from nothing” boundary condition demands that when the universe is big (a 2 Λ/3 > 1 where Λ is the cosmological constant and a is the scale factor of the universe) there is only an outgoing wave in the superspace [135,136].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [135]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [136]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In ordinary quantum mechanics, a particle bounded in a well surrounded by a barrier has a finite probability to tunnel through the barrier to the outside if the height of the barrier is finite.
“In ordinary quantum mechanics, a particle bounded in a well surrounded by a barrier has a finite probability to tunnel through the barrier to the outside if the height of the barrier is finite (as in the α-decay of radioactive nuclei [132][133][134]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [132]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [133]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [134]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Cassidy and Hawking have admitted that back-reaction does not enforce chronology protection.
“In a recent paper, Cassidy and Hawking [143] have admitted that “back-reaction does not enforce chronology protection”.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [143]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Quantum field theory is well-defined in a Euclidean space because there are no CTCs in a Euclidean space.
“Quantum field theory is well-defined in a Euclidean space because there are no CTCs in a Euclidean space [147].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [147]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The usual quantum field theory cannot be directly extended to a spacetime with CTCs.
“Basically speaking, their theorems imply that the usual quantum field theory cannot be directly extended to a spacetime with CTCs [144].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [144]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
In such a case, if we trace the history of the Universe backward, inevitably we will enter a region of CTCs.
“In such a case, if we trace the history of the Universe backward, inevitably we will enter a region of CTCs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Krasnikov has found some two-dimensional spacetimes with CTCs for which the energy-momentum tensor of vacuum polarization is bounded on the Cauchy horizon.
“Krasnikov [27] has found some two-dimensional spacetimes with CTCs for which the energy-momentum tensor of vacuum polarization is bounded on the Cauchy horizon.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Hawking and Penrose's singularity theorems do not apply if the Universe has had CTCs.
“It is interesting to note that Hawking and Penrose's singularity theorems do not apply if the Universe has had CTCs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In classical general relativity, a region with CTCs and a region without closed causal curves must be separated by a Cauchy horizon (compactly generated or non-compactly generated) which usually contains closed null geodesics if it is compactly generated.
“In classical general relativity, a region with CTCs and a region without closed causal curves must be separated by a Cauchy horizon (compactly generated or non-compactly generated) which usually contains closed null geodesics if it is compactly generated [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
These arguments imply that in the case of a spacetime with CTCs where the energy-momentum tensor of vacuum polarization diverges at the Cauchy horizon, quantum gravity effects should become important near the Cauchy horizon.
“But in any case, these arguments imply that in the case of a spacetime with CTCs where the energy-momentum tensor of vacuum polarization diverges at the Cauchy horizon, quantum gravity effects should become important near the Cauchy horizon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
So the beginning point in the Vilenkin model is indeed like the south pole of the Earth.
“So the beginning point in the Vilenkin model is indeed like the south pole of the Earth [13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Kay, Radzikowski, and Wald have proved two theorems demonstrating that some fundamental quantities such as Hadamard functions and energy-momentum tensors must be ill-defined on a compactly generated Cauchy horizon in a spacetime with CTCs, as one extends usual quantum field theory in a global hyperbolic spacetime to an acausal spacetime with a compactly generated Cauchy horizon.
“Recently, Kay, Radzikowski, and Wald [144] have proved two theorems which demonstrate that some fundamental quantities such as Hadamard functions and energy-momentum tensors must be ill-defined on a compactly generated Cauchy horizon in a spacetime with CTCs, as one extends the usual quantum field theory in a global hyperbolic spacetime to an acausal spacetime with a compactly generated Cauchy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [144]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
By introducing a spherical reflecting boundary between two mouths of a wormhole, Li has shown that with some boundary conditions for geodesics (e.g. the reflection boundary condition) closed null geodesics may be removed from the Cauchy horizon separating the region with CTCs and the region without closed causal curves.
“By introducing a spherical reflecting boundary between two mouths of a wormhole, Li [23] has shown that with some boundary conditions for geodesics (e.g. the reflection boundary condition) closed null geodesics [usually the “archcriminal” for the divergence of the energy-momentum tensor as the Cauchy horizon is approached (see e.g.[16])] may be removed from the Cauchy horizon separating the region”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Following Li, Low has given another example of spacetime with CTCs but without closed causal geodesics.
“Following Li [23], Low [24] has given another example of spacetime with CTCs but without closed causal geodesics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [24]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
It has been shown that if a compact Lorentzian spacetime undergoes topology changes, there must be CTCs in this spacetime.
“And, it has been shown that, if a compact Lorentzian spacetime undergoes topology changes, there must be CTCs in this spacetime [140,19,20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [140]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [19]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The chronology protection conjecture does not provide any restriction on spacetimes with CTCs but no Cauchy horizons since there is no indication that this type of spacetime is unstable against vacuum polarization.
“It should be mentioned that the chronology protection conjecture does not provide any restriction on spacetimes with CTCs but no Cauchy horizons since there is no any indication that this type of spacetime is unstable against vacuum polarization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This is essentially different from tunneling in ordinary quantum mechanics since in ordinary quantum mechanics tunneling always takes place from one classically allowed region to another classically allowed region where the current and the probability are conserved.
“Thus this is essentially different from tunneling in ordinary quantum mechanics since in ordinary quantum mechanics tunneling always takes place from one classically allowed region to another classically allowed region where the current and the probability are conserved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Therefore CTCs may play an important role in the creation of the Universe.
“Therefore CTCs may play an important role in the creation of the Universe.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Cramer and Kay have shown that Kay, Radzikowski, and Wald's theorems also apply to Misner space where the Cauchy horizon is not compactly generated, in the sense that the energy-momentum tensor must be ill-defined on the Cauchy horizon itself.
“Cramer and Kay [150,151] have shown that Kay, Radzikowski, and Wald's theorems [144] also apply to Misner space (for Sushkov's automorphic field case [28] and Krasnikov's two-dimensional case [27], respectively) where the Cauchy horizon is not compactly generated, in the sense that the energy-momentum tensor must be ill-defined on the Cauchy horizon itself.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [150]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [151]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [144]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Ordinary quantum field theory must be significantly changed or some new approach must be introduced when one tries to do quantum field theory on a spacetime with CTCs.
“The ordinary quantum field theory must be significantly changed or some new approach must be introduced when one tries to do quantum field theory on a spacetime with CTCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Creation from 'nothing' is supposed to take place from a classically forbidden (Euclidean) region to a classically allowed (Lorentzian) region, so the conservation of current is obviously violated.
“But creation from “nothing” is supposed to take place from a classically forbidden (Euclidean) region to a classically allowed (Lorentzian) region, so the conservation of current is obviously violated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Vilenkin's tunneling universe was based on an analogy between quantum creation of universes and tunneling in ordinary quantum mechanics.
“Vilenkin's tunneling universe was based on an analogy between quantum creation of universes and tunneling in ordinary quantum mechanics [11].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
From the arguments in the last section, the Universe does not seem to be created from nothing.
“From the arguments in the last section, we find that the Universe does not seem to be created from nothing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
CTCs do not mean that the energy-momentum tensor must diverge.
“Thus CTCs do not mean that the energy-momentum tensor must diverge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The universe with metric (72) is a type of Kantowski-Sachs universe.
“The universe with metric (72) is a type of Kantowski-Sachs universe [164].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [164]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Otherwise the collision of light cones from R and light cones from L will destroy the Cauchy horizon.
“Otherwise the collision of light cones from R and light cones from L will destroy the Cauchy horizon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If T_ab T^ab is zero in some region (not a single point) in Misner space, the corresponding T_ab T^ab is zero in the corresponding region in multiply connected de Sitter space.
“(3) if T ab T ab is zero in some region (not a single point) in Misner space, the corresponding T ab T ab is also zero in the corresponding region in the multiply connected de Sitter space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Usually there is no well-defined quantum field theory in a spacetime with CTCs.
“Usually there is no well-defined quantum field theory in a spacetime with CTCs.(Kay-Radzikowski-Wald's theorems [144] enforce this claim, though they do not apply directly to an acausal spacetime without a Cauchy horizon.)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [144]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The back-reaction of vacuum polarization does not enforce the chronology protection conjecture.
“However, we can conclude that the back-reaction of vacuum polarization does not enforce the chronology protection conjecture, a point Hawking himself also admits [143].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [143]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The first thermodynamic law of event horizons δM_c = T δA is preserved in the time-nonorientable de Sitter space.
“This together with T = 2T G-H tells us that the first thermodynamic law of event horizons δM c = T δA is preserved, where M c is the mass within the horizon, and A is the area of the horizon [100].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [100]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The conical singularity condition may be regarded as a geometrical explanation of the self-consistent condition β = 2πr0.
“This may be regarded as a geometrical explanation of the self-consistent condition in (96).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The cold-to-hot structure of dS/B gives rise to an arrow of increasing entropy, from a cold region to a hot region.
“This gives rise to an arrow of increasing entropy, from a cold region to a hot region (Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In Misner space, Li and Gott found that the adapted Rindler vacuum is self-consistent if b = 2π.
“Therefore, in the case of Misner space, Li and Gott [30] have tried to find a vacuum which is also self-consistent and found that the adapted Rindler vacuum is such a vacuum if b = 2π.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
De Sitter space can be represented by a timelike hyperbolic hypersurface embedded in five-dimensional Minkowski space, with r0 = (3/Λ)^(1/2).
“De Sitter space can be represented by a timelike hyperbolic hypersurface W 2 + X 2 + Y 2 + Z 2 -V 2 = r 2 0 ,(61) embedded in a five-dimensional Minkowski space (V, W, X, Y, Z) with the metric ds 2 = -dV 2 + dW 2 + dX 2 + dY 2 + dZ 2 , (62 ) where r 0 = (3/Λ) 1/2 [40,90].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [40]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [90]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductcitation
When a covering space exists, quantum field theory in a spacetime with CTCs can be done in the covering space with the method of images.
“However, in the case where a covering space exists, we can do it in the covering space with the method of images.In fact in most cases where the energy-momentum tensor in spacetimes with CTCs has been calculated, this method has been used (for the theoretical basis for the method of images see Ref. [15] and references cited therein).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
In multiply connected de Sitter space, T_ab T^ab is zero everywhere except at the intersection of two light cones.
“Thus, in multiply connected de Sitters pace, T ab T ab is also zero everywhere except at the intersection of two light cones.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A particle detector moving along such a geodesic in this time-nonorientable spacetime perceives thermal radiation with temperature T = 2T_G-H.
“Therefore a particle detector moving along such a geodesic in this time-nonorientable spacetime perceives thermal radiation with temperature T = 2T G-H .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If T_ab T^ab diverges on the Cauchy horizon in Misner space, the corresponding T_ab T^ab also diverges on the Cauchy horizon in multiply connected de Sitter space.
“(1) if T ab T ab diverges on the Cauchy horizon in Misner space, the corresponding T ab T ab also diverges on the Cauchy horizon in our multiply connected de Sitter space;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The principle of self-consistency naturally gives rise to an arrow of time in the multiply connected de Sitter space.
“In this subsection we argue that the principle of self-consistency [178,179] naturally gives rise to an arrow of time in our multiply connected de Sitter space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [178]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [179]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Hawking has given a general proof that any future chronology horizon is classically unstable unless light rays are diverging when they propagate near the chronology horizon.
“Hawking [20] has given a general proof along the above lines that any future chronology horizon is classically unstable unless light rays are diverging when they propagate near the chronology horizon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
If T_ab T^ab is finite in some region (except at the Cauchy horizon) in Misner space, the corresponding T_ab T^ab is finite in the corresponding region (not at the Cauchy horizon) in multiply connected de Sitter space.
“(2) if T ab T ab is finite in some region (except at the Cauchy horizon) in Misner space, the corresponding T ab T ab is also finite in the corresponding region (not at the Cauchy horizon) in the multiply connected de Sitter space;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This periodic boundary condition (the self-consistent condition) is sufficient to fix the solutions of the universe.
“This periodic boundary condition (the self-consistent condition) is sufficient to fix the solutions of the universe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
From the point of view of an observer at the center of a V = Λ/8π bubble, just after the tunneling event, he would see himself in a de Sitter space that was initially static but starts to inflate.
“From the point of view of an observer sitting at the center of V = Λ/8π bubble, he would see himself, just after the tunneling event, as sitting in a de Sitter space that was initially static but which starts to inflate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Li [26] has estimated the fluctuation of the metric of the background spacetime caused by vacuum polarization with absorption, which is a small number in most cases.
“Li [26] has estimated the fluctuation of the metric of the background spacetime caused by vacuum polarization with absorption, which is a small number in most cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The infinitely expanding de Sitter space, which begins expanding at the tunneling event, is a perfect starting point for making an infinite number of bubble universes, because it has a finite beginning and then expands forever.
“This infinitely expanding de Sitter space, which begins expanding at the tunneling event, is a perfect starting point (just like Vilenkin's tunneling universe) for making an infinite number of bubble universes, as this de Sitter space has a finite beginning and then expands forever.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
An event in F + R and an event in P + L are always causally independent in physics: they can never physically influence each other though they may be mathematically connected by some causal curves.
“An event in F +R and an event in P +L are always causally independent in physics: they can never physically influence each other though they may be mathematically connected by some causal curves (null curves or timelike curves).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
If the absorption is caused by electron-positron pair production by a photon in a photon-electron collision, the maximum value of the metric fluctuation is (δg μν)max ∼ l_P^2/(r_e L), where l_P is the Planck length, r_e is the classical radius of electron, and L is the spatial distance between the identified points in the frame of rest relative to the absorber.
“If the absorption is caused by electron-positron pair production by a photon in a photon-electron collision, the maximum value of the metric fluctuation is (δg µν ) max ∼ l 2 P /(r e L), where l P is the Planck length, r e is the classical radius of electron, L is the spatial distance between the identified points in the frame of rest relative to the absorber [26].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
In our multiply connected de Sitter space, for inflation to proceed, there should be the additional requirement that bubbles do not collide with images of themselves (producing percolation).
“In our multiply connected de Sitter space, for inflation to proceed, there should be the additional requirement that bubbles do not collide with images of themselves (producing percolation).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Converging rays are turned into diverging rays during the tunneling event without violating the weak energy condition.
“Thus, converging rays are turned into diverging rays (as in the wormhole solution) during the tunneling event without violating the weak energy condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If the potential in R is chosen to be retarded, then the potential in L must be advanced.
“If we choose the potential in R to be retarded, then the potential in L must be advanced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In multiply connected de Sitter space, region F and region P are causally independent in physics: an event in F can never influence an event in P, and vice versa.
“From the above discussion we find that in the multiply connected de Sitter space region F and region P are causally independent in physics: the self-consistent potential in F is the retarded potential, while the self-consistent potential in P is the advanced potential, thus an event in F can never influence an event in P, and vice versa.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
This model produces, inside the black hole, to the future, and behind the event horizon, an expanding de Sitter phase that has a beginning, like Vilenkin's tunneling universe.
“This model thus produces, inside the black hole, to the future, and behind the event horizon, an expanding de Sitter phase that has a beginning, just like Vilenkin's tunneling universe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
There are no particles crossing the Cauchy horizons separating P from R and F from L.
“Thus, there are no particles crossing the Cauchy horizons separating P from R and F form L.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
If the metastable vacuum is at the GUT density, which is many orders of magnitude lower than the Planck density, then the number of trials becomes truly formidable (P ∼ 10^-10^18).
“but if it is at the GUT density which turns out to be many orders of magnitude lower than the Planck density, then the number of trials becomes truly formidable (P ∼ 10 -10 18 ) [32].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
It would seem difficult for the super-civilization that made the metastable state that later gave rise to our universe to have been able to manipulate the physical constants in our universe.
“Thus, it would seem difficult for the super-civilization that made the metastable state that later gave rise to our universe to have been able to manipulate the physical constants in our universe.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For b = 2π, in order that there be less than a 5% chance that a bubble forms in V_I (and thus less than 0.05% chance in V_II), ε should be less than 2 × 10^-3.
“For the case of b = 2π, in order that there be less than a 5% chance that a bubble forms in V I (and thus less than 0.05% chance in V II ), ǫ should be less than 2 × 10 -3 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tunneling probability ε is exponentially small.
- Interpretationnone given
We can smoothly extend F + R to P + L so that the total multiply connected de Sitter space dS/B is geodesically complete but not a manifold at a two-sphere.
“On the other hand, we can smoothly extend F + R to P + L so that the total multiply connected de Sitter space dS/B is geodesically complete but at the price that it is not a manifold at a two-sphere (section IX A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
These closed null geodesics need not be infinitely extendible in affine distance toward the past.
“These closed null geodesics need not be infinitely extendible in affine distance toward the past.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Thus it would not be surprising to find region R and region F for epochs 0 < τ < τ0 = 0.086 r0 clear of bubble formation events (and clear of real particles), which is all we require.
“Thus it would not be surprising to find region R and region F for epochs 0 < τ < τ 0 = 0.086r 0 clear of bubble formation events (and clear of real particles), which is all we require.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tunneling probability ε is exponentially small.
- Interpretationnone given
A retarded photon traveling around one of those closed null geodesics will be red-shifted more and more on each cycle, thus not causing an instability.
“A retarded photon traveling around one of those closed null geodesics will be red-shifted more and more on each cycle, thus not causing an instability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
In this case the Cauchy horizons separating F from R and P from L are classically stable, as indicated by our detailed study of T_ab T^ab as these Cauchy horizons are approached.
“In this case the Cauchy horizons separating F from R and P from L are classically stable, as indicated by our detailed study of T ab T ab as these Cauchy horizons are approached.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
All that super-civilizations might reasonably be able to do would be to drive the baby universe up into a particular metastable vacuum.
“All, they might reasonably be able to do would be to drive the baby universe up into a particular metastable vacuum [32].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Region F has an infinite four-volume and thus there should be an infinite number of bubble universes formed.
“Region F (its fundamental cell is shown in Fig. 4) has an infinite four-volume and thus there should be an infinite number of bubble universes formed [89,98].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [98]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
This model describes two physically disconnected but mathematically connected universes.
“This model describes two physically disconnected but mathematically connected universes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
There is a Cauchy horizon separating the region of CTCs from the later region that does not contain them.
“There is a Cauchy horizon (CH, see Fig. 7) separating the region of CTCs from the later region that does not contain them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
If a future chronology horizon is replaced by a past chronology horizon, Hawking's proof breaks down because a wave packet propagating toward the future near the past chronology horizon will suffer a red-shift instead of a blue-shift.
“However, in Hawking's proof [20], if we replace a future chronology horizon with a past chronology horizon, then the proof breaks down because, in such a case, a wave packet propagating toward the future near the past chronology horizon will suffer a red-shift instead of a blue-shift.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
All bubbles formed after the epoch τ0 in F in the multiply connected de Sitter space will never collide with themselves.
“Therefore all bubbles formed after the epoch τ 0 in F in the multiply connected de Sitter space will never collide with themselves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The topological multi-connectivity in F + R gives rise to a periodic boundary condition, which is a kind of self-consistent boundary condition.
“the topological multi-connectivity in F + R has already given rise to a periodic boundary condition (which is a kind of self-consistent boundary condition).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If the probability of forming a bubble per volume r0^4 in de Sitter space is ε, then the total probability of forming a bubble in V_I is P_I = (4/3)π b ε.
“If the probability of forming a bubble per volume r 4 0 in de Sitter space is ǫ, then the total probability of forming a bubble in V I is P I = 4 3 πbǫ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Centered on this observer's antipodal point in de Sitter space, he would see a bubble of ordinary V = 0 vacuum surrounding a black hole of mass M.
“Centered on this observer's antipodal point in de Sitter space, he would see a bubble of ordinary V = 0 vacuum surrounding a black hole of mass M .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In region P, the potentials are advanced, so Hawking's instability does not arise as one approaches the Cauchy horizon separating it from R.
“In region P, the potentials are advanced, so Hawking's instability does not arise as one approaches the Cauchy horizon separating it from R.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
From the de Sitter observer's point of view, the black hole evaporates by Hawking radiation, eventually leaving an empty V = 0 bubble in an ever-expanding de Sitter space.
“From the point of view of the de Sitter observer, the black hole also evaporates by Hawking radiation, eventually leaving an empty V = 0 bubble in an ever-expanding de Sitter space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
To reach the N-th image one has to pass through the hot optically thick thermal radiation of the hot Big Bang N times.
“Thus, to reach the N -th image one has to pass through the hot optically thick thermal radiation of the hot Big Bang N times.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In order that inflation proceeds and the bubbles do not percolate, it is required that ε < ε_cr where 5.8 × 10^-9 < ε_cr < 0.24.
“In order that the inflation proceeds and the bubbles (which expand to the future -as expected with the retarded potential in region F ) do not percolate, it is required that ǫ < ǫ cr where 5.8 × 10 -9 < ǫ cr < 0.24 [95].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [95]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
This will cause the contribution of the N-th image to the renormalized energy-momentum tensor to be exponentially damped by a factor e^{-Nτ} where τ ≡ nzσ_t ≫ 1.
“And this will cause the contribution of the N -th image to the renormalized energy-momentum tensor to be exponentially damped by a factor e -N τ where τ ≡ nzσ t ≫ 1 (where n is the number density of target particles, z is the thickness of hot material, σ t is the total cross-section).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Therefore a past chronology horizon, according to Hawking's argument, is classically stable in a world with retarded potentials.
“Therefore a past chronology horizon, according to Hawking's argument, is classically stable in a world with retarded potentials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It seems easier to have a Cauchy horizon in the early universe.
“It thus seems easier to have a Cauchy horizon in the early universe.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The tunneling model ignores the zero-point-energy.
“The problem with this model is that it ignores the”
- Also stated in: § XI. CONCLUSIONS · plain
“zero-point-energy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § XI. CONCLUSIONS · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
We may need no boundary condition because we have a periodic boundary condition instead.
“But we may need no boundary condition since we have a periodic boundary condition instead.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If this zero-point-energy is considered, the quantum behavior of the universe is like a particle of unit mass with total energy 1/2 moving in the potential U(a).
“If this “zero-point-energy” is considered, the quantum behavior of the universe is like a particle of unit mass with total energy 1/2 moving in the potential U (a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Since these models are all ones in which there are an infinite number of baby universes created, this multiply connected outcome must occur unless the probability for a particular multiple connectivity to exist is exactly zero.
“Since these models are all ones in which there are an infinite number of baby universes created, this multiply connected outcome must occur unless the probability for a particular multiple connectivity to exist is exactly zero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: One of the created baby universes is the original universe that one started with.
- Interpretationreasoning
If one of the baby universes turns out to be the one we started with, then we get a model with an epoch of CTCs that is over by now, bounded toward the future by a Cauchy horizon.
“If one of the baby universes simply turns out to be the one we started with, then we get a model with an epoch of CTCs that is over by now, bounded toward the future by a Cauchy horizon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The divergence of the energy-momentum tensor as one approaches the Cauchy horizon does not necessarily occur, particularly when the Cauchy horizon crosses through a hot Big Bang phase where absorption occurs.
“We have argued that the divergence of the energy-momentum tensor as one approaches the Cauchy horizon does not necessarily occur, particularly when the Cauchy horizon crosses through a hot Big Bang phase where absorption occurs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The dense absorber can make the Cauchy horizon stable against vacuum polarization effects.
- Interpretationreasoning
If in the recycling model one of the Λ1 bubbles formed inside an Λ2 bubble inside a Λ1 region is the Λ1 region that one started out with, then we would have a multiply connected model including a region of CTCs.
“Now take this recycling model where it turns out that one of the Λ 1 bubbles formed inside an Λ 2 bubble inside a Λ 1 region is, in fact, the Λ 1 region that one started out with.In this case, we would have a multiply connected model such as we are proposing which would include a region of CTCs (Fig. 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- The authors state this as an assumption: One of the created baby universes is the original universe that one started with.
- Interpretationreasoning
This would make every black hole produce an infinite number of universes.
“This would make every black hole produce an infinite number of universes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
If the zero-point-energy 1/2 were neglected (as Hartle and Hawking did), the left classically allowed region would shrink to a point.
“If the “zero-point-energy” 1/2 were neglected (as Hartle and Hawking did), the left classically allowed region would shrink to a point.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Self-consistency (non-divergence of T_ab as CH is approached) requires retarded potentials in R and F.
“Self-consistency (non-divergence of T ab T ab as CH is approached) requires retarded potentials in R and F.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Since any closed null geodesics generating the Cauchy horizon must circulate through the optically thick region of the hot Big Bang phase after inflation has stopped, the renormalized energy-momentum tensor should not blow up as the Cauchy horizon is approached.
“Since any closed null geodesics generating the Cauchy horizon must circulate through the optically thick region of the hot Big Bang phase of the universe after the inflation has stopped, the renormalized energy-momentum tensor should not blow up as the Cauchy horizon is approached.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The early universe contained a region of CTCs.
- Premisecitation
Depending on the coordinate system, a bubble of Λ2 forming inside a Λ1 universe could also be seen as a Λ1 bubble forming inside a Λ2 universe.
“They point out that depending on the coordinate system, a bubble of Λ 2 forming inside a Λ 1 universe could also be seen as a Λ 1 bubble forming inside of a Λ 2 universe.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In the Garriga-Vilenkin recycling model, there is a metastable vacuum with cosmological constant Λ1 and a true lowest energy vacuum with cosmological constant Λ2, with Λ1 at the GUT or Planck scale and Λ2 taken to be the present value of Λ.
“In this model there is a metastable vacuum with cosmological constant Λ 1 , and a true lowest energy vacuum with a cosmological constant Λ 2 .Λ 1 is at the GUT or Planck energy scale, while Λ 2 is taken to be the present value of Λ (as might be the case in a flat-Λ model).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Since our multiply connected versions already obey the weak energy condition, the associated simply connected versions would also obey it.
“Since our multiply connected versions already obey the weak energy condition, so would the associated simply connected versions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The low-entropy boundary condition could occur on the Cauchy horizon that ends the period of CTCs.
“This could occur on the Cauchy horizon that ends the period of CTCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The region of CTCs should be in a pure vacuum state containing no real particles or Hawking radiation and no bubbles.
“and should be in a pure vacuum state containing no real particles or Hawking radiation and no bubbles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
At late times in the de Sitter phase a particle detector would find the usual Hawking radiation just as in the usual vacuum for de Sitter space.
“At late times in the de Sitter phase a particle detector would find the usual Hawking radiation just as in the usual vacuum for de Sitter space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In our model, the multiply connected nature of the spacetime geometry forces an arrow of time and retarded potentials.
“Interestingly, in our model, the multiply connected nature of the spacetime geometry forces an arrow of time and retarded potentials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
There are a number of models in which baby universes are created which can be converted into models in which the Universe creates itself, if one of those created baby universes turns out to be the original universe that one started with.
“Thus, there are a number of models in which baby universes are created which can be converted into models in which the Universe creates itself, if one of those created baby universes turns out to be the original universe that one started with.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: One of the created baby universes is the original universe that one started with.
- Premisecitation
A wormhole solution connecting two mouths must violate the weak energy condition.
“To do this, the wormhole solution must violate the weak energy condition [7].It must have some negative energy density material, for it is a diverging lens (converging light rays entering one wormhole mouth, diverge upon exiting the other mouth).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
If one found oneself in an expanding de Sitter phase, it would be much more likely that it was the result of classical bounce from a contracting de Sitter phase, rather than the result of a contracting de Sitter phase that had tunneled to an oscillating phase and then back out to an expanding de Sitter phase.
“In this case, if one found oneself in an expanding de Sitter phase, it would be much more likely that it was the result of classical bounce from a contracting de Sitter phase, rather than the result of a contracting de Sitter phase that had tunneled to an oscillating phase and then back out to an expanding de Sitter phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Gott space represents how a multiply connected spacetime with CTCs (Grant space) can be converted into a simply connected spacetime with CTCs by adding material that obeys the weak energy condition.
“Thus, Gott space represents how a multiply connected spacetime with CTCs (Grant space) can be converted into a simply connected spacetime with CTCs by adding to the solution material that obeys the weak energy condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Given quantum mechanics, such multiple connectivities would not be absolutely forbidden, particularly in the Planck foam era.
“Given quantum mechanics, it would seem that such multiple connectivities would not be absolutely forbidden, particularly in the Planck foam era.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The potential makes the system behave like a harmonic oscillator in the potential well near a=0.
“The potential makes the system behave like a harmonic oscillator in the potential well near a = 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If one of these baby universes simply turns out to be the universe we started with, then a multiply connected model with early CTCs bounded by a Cauchy horizon is produced.
“If one of these baby universes simply turns out to be the universe we started with, then a multiply connected model with early CTCs bounded by a Cauchy horizon is produced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The early universe contained a region of CTCs.
- Rests on an assumption: One of the baby universes produced by inflation turns out to be the universe we started with.
- Interpretationreasoning
It is the very presence of the initial region of CTCs that produces the strong causality that we observe later on.
“Thus, it is the very presence of the initial region of CTCs that produces the strong causality that we observe later on.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If one of those bubble universes is the original one in which the black hole formed, then the solution is multiply connected with a region of CTCs.
“If one of those bubble universes simply turns out to be the original one in which the black hole formed, then the solution is multiply connected with a region of CTCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: One of the created baby universes is the original universe that one started with.
- Premisenone given
A wormhole connection between two widely separated mouths in an asymptotically flat spacetime increases the genus by one.
“Consider an asymptotically flat spacetime with two connected wormhole mouths that are widely separated.The existence of the wormhole connection increases the genus by one.Instead of a flat plane, it becomes a flat plane with a handle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
When the zero-point-energy is considered, the initial state is not a point but a tiny oscillating (0 ≤ a ≤ a1) Big Bang universe that oscillates between Big Bangs and Big Crunches.
“Thus, when the”
- Also stated in: § XI. CONCLUSIONS · plain
“zero-point-energy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § XI. CONCLUSIONS · plain
- Interpretationcitation
In the early universe, the negative divergence of entropy may turn out to be an advantage, since to produce the ordinary entropy arrow of time we observe today, we must necessarily have some kind of natural low-entropy boundary condition in the early universe.
“Yet, in the early universe this may turn out to be an advantage, since to produce the ordinary entropy arrow of time we observe in the universe today, we must necessarily have some kind of natural low-entropy boundary condition in the early universe [58,59].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [58]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [59]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
If Λ1 = Λ2, this model is just the multiply connected de Sitter space we have considered.
“(If Λ 1 = Λ 2 , this model is just the multiply connected de Sitter space we have considered.)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Borde and Vilenkin have shown that if the initial inflationary state is metastable, then it must have had a finite beginning.
“Inflation has solved some of these problems, but Borde and Vilenkin have shown that if the initial inflationary state is metastable, then it must have had a finite beginning also.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Borde and Vilenkin
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
The classical instability problem of a future Cauchy horizon in a spacetime with CTCs is solved in a world with retarded potentials for a Cauchy horizon that occurs to our past and which ends an epoch of CTCs.
“But this problem is solved in a world with retarded potentials for a Cauchy horizon that occurs to our past (a past chronology horizon) and which ends an epoch of CTCs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Our multiply connected solutions might in principle be made simply connected by adding extra positive mass density without violating the weak energy condition.
“Our solutions are already multiply connected, so they might in principle be made simply connected by the addition of some extra positive mass density, without violating the weak energy condition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Inflation is particularly useful in this regard, because starting with a tiny piece of inflating state, at later times a huge volume of inflating state is produced, little pieces of which look just like the one we started with.
“Inflation is particularly useful in this regard, for starting with a tiny piece of inflating state, at later times a huge volume of inflating state is produced, little pieces of which look just like the one we started with.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In the Hartle-Hawking no-boundary proposal with Wheeler-DeWitt potential and E = 0, the Universe should start not as nothing but as an S3 universe of radius zero, a point.
“Unfortunately, tunneling is, as the name suggests, usually a process that involves tunneling from one classical state to another, thus, with the Wheeler-DeWitt potential and”
- Also stated in: § X. BABY UNIVERSE MODELS · plain
“energy”
- Also stated in: § XI. CONCLUSIONS · plain
“E = 0 that Hartle and Hawking adopted, the Universe, we argue, should really start not as nothing but as an S 3 universe of radius zeroa point.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hartle and Hawking
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § X. BABY UNIVERSE MODELS · plain
- Interpretationown data
The smoothness of the potential at a = 0 may indicate that any Big Bang and Big Crunch singularities are removed by quantum theory.
“The smoothness of the potential at a = 0 may indicate that any Big Bang and Big Crunch singularities are removed by quantum theory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
A harmonic oscillator cannot sit at the bottom of the potential well because the uncertainty principle would not allow it.
“A harmonic oscillator cannot sit at the bottom of the potential well -the uncertainty principle would not allow it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The adapted Rindler vacuum for Misner space is a self-consistent vacuum for this spacetime because it solves Einstein's equations for this geometry.
“thus, this is a self-consistent vacuum for this spacetime since it solves Einstein's equations for this geometry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
With inflation, event horizons should exist in the early universe as well.
“Now, with inflation, we see that event horizons should exist in the early universe as well [89].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Hiscock and Konkowski's result that the energy-momentum tensor of the adapted Minkowski vacuum in Misner space diverges as the Cauchy horizon is approached motivated the chronology protection conjecture.
“This conjecture was motivated by Hiscock and Konkowski's result that the energy-momentum tensor of the adapted Minkowski vacuum in Misner space diverges as the Cauchy horizon is approached.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hiscock and Konkowski
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Self-consistency near the Cauchy horizons in a spacetime with CTCs naturally gives rise to an arrow of time.
“Self-consistency near the Cauchy horizons in a spacetime with CTCs naturally gives rise to an arrow of time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The multiply connected nature of this model and the possibility of waves running into themselves ensure the creation of an arrow of time in this model.
“Thus, the multiply connected nature of this model and the possibility of waves running into themselves, ensure the creation of an arrow of time in this model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is possible to find self-consistent solutions for this geometry.
“Thus, it is possible to find self-consistent solutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Many inflationary models allow creation of baby inflationary universes inside black holes, either by tunneling across the Einstein-Rosen bridge, or by formation as one approaches the singularity.
“Many inflationary models allow creation of baby inflationary universes inside black holes, either by tunneling across the Einstein-Rosen bridge, or by formation as one approaches the singularity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 130
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 84
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningA de Sitter space with r0 given by Eq. (92) automatically satisfies the semiclassical Einstein equations, and such a de Sitter space and its corresponding vacuum are self-consistent.
“A de Sitter space with r 0 given by Eq. ( 92) automatically satisfies the semiclassical Einstein's equations (90).Such a de Sitter space and its corresponding vacuum are thus self-consistent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIf β = 2πr0, the adapted conformal Rindler vacuum energy-momentum tensor is regular on the whole space; otherwise both T^ν_μ CR,ren and T^μν CR,ren T_μν CR,ren diverge as the Cauchy horizon is approached.
“We find that, if β = 2πr 0 ,(96) this energy-momentum tensor is regular on the whole space.[Eq.( 96) corresponds to b = 2π via Eq.( 83)].Otherwise both T ν µ CR,ren and T µν CR,ren T µν CR,ren diverge as the Cauchy horizon is approached.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThere always exists a locally conformal map between F and F-O (defined by t^2 - x^2 - y^2 - z^2 < 1 in F), and future infinity (t → ∞) in F corresponds to the hyperbola η^2 = 1 + y^2 + z^2 (i.e. t^2 - x^2 - y^2 - z^2 = 1) in F.
“This means that there always exists a locally conformal map between F and F-O (defined by t 2 -x 2 -y 2 -z 2 < 1 in F), and future infinity ( t → ∞) in F corresponds to the hyperbola η2 = 1 + y 2 + z 2 (i.e.t 2 -x 2 -y 2 -z 2 = 1) in F.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe self-consistent vacuum for Misner space is the adapted Rindler vacuum, and b = 2π is the self-consistent condition.
“We [30] have called this vacuum the self-consistent vacuum for Misner space, and b = 2π is the self-consistent condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor de Sitter space, R_ab = Λ g_ab, R = 4Λ, and thus (1)H_ab = 0 and (3)H_ab = (1/3)Λ^2 g_ab = 3/r0^4 g_ab.
“For de Sitter space we have R ab = Λg ab , R = 4Λ, and thus (1) H ab = 0, (3) H ab = 1 3 Λ 2 g ab = 3 r 4 0 g ab .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn our multiply connected de Sitter spacetime, as also in Misner space, there is no diverging mechanism near the horizon; a light ray propagating in de Sitter space will focus rather than diverge.
“Unfortunately, in our multiply connected de Sitter spacetime (as also in Misner space) there is no such diverging mechanism.A light ray propagating in de Sitter space will focus rather than diverge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [183]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn the case b = 2π, as T → ∞, the contribution of all n ≠ 0 terms decreases exponentially to zero; thus, at events far from the Cauchy horizon in F, the particle detector perceives pure Hawking radiation given by the n = 0 term.
“As T → ∞, the contribution of all n = 0 terms decreases exponentially to zero.Thus, at events far from the Cauchy horizon in F , the particle detector perceives pure Hawking radiation given by the n = 0 term.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone givenThe solutions to Eq. (91) are r0^2 = (3/(2Λ))(1 ± sqrt(1 - Λ/(270π))).
“If Λ = 0, we find that the solutions to Eq. ( 91) are r 2 0 = 3 2Λ 1 ± 1 - Λ 270π .(92)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor the multiply connected Minkowski spacetime S^1 × R^3 with the adapted Minkowski vacuum, the renormalized energy-momentum tensor of a conformally coupled scalar field is constant, finite everywhere, and has the form of radiation.
“We find that this energy-momentum tensor is constant and finite everywhere and has the form of radiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe energy-momentum tensor in the adapted conformal Minkowski vacuum in dS/B diverges at the Cauchy horizon as r → r0 for any finite β, and the divergence is coordinate independent since T^μν T_μν also diverges there.
“Similar to Misner space, this energy-momentum tensor diverges at the Cauchy horizon as r → r 0 for any finite β; and the divergence is coordinate independent since T µν CM,ren T µν CM,ren also diverges there.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn dS/B with the adapted Rindler vacuum, region R is cold (temperature zero) but region F is hot (temperature T_G-H); similarly, region L is cold but P is hot.
“From the above discussion, we find that in our multiply connected de Sitter space with the adapted Rindler vacuum, region R is cold (where the temperature is zero) but region F is hot (where the temperature is T G-H ).Similarly, region L is cold but P is hot”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe response function for a detector in Vilenkin's tunneling universe is dF/dT = r_0/(2π) ∆E/(e^{2πr_0∆E}-1), which is thermal radiation with the Gibbons-Hawking temperature T_G-H = 1/(2πr_0).
“Thus we have dF dT = r 0 2π ∆E e 2πr0∆E -1 ,(55) which is just the response function for a detector in a thermal radiation with the Gibbons-Hawking temperature [100] T G-H = 1 2πr 0 .(56)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [100]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAny hypersurface of τ = constant has topology R^1 × S^2 and has four Killing vectors.
“Any hypersurface of τ = constant has topology R 1 × S 2 and has four killing vectors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe adapted conformal Minkowski vacuum is not self-consistent for the multiply connected de Sitter space dS/B; it does not solve the semiclassical Einstein equations.
“Though the conformal Minkowski vacuum is a good vacuum for simply connected de Sitter space [158,159], it (in the adapted version) is not self-consistent for the multiply connected de Sitter space dS/B.(That is, it does not solve the semiclassical Einstein's equations.)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [158]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [159]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn region R of Misner space, both the retarded and the advanced potential are self-consistent.
“Therefore in region R both the retarded and the advanced potential are self-consistent, but the part-retarded-and-part-advanced potential is not self-consistent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn region L of Misner space, both the retarded and the advanced potential are self-consistent, but a part-retarded-and-part-advanced potential is not self-consistent.
“This conclusion also holds for region L.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe horizon at r = r0 in static de Sitter coordinates corresponds to the horizon ξ = 0 in Rindler space, and the worldline r = 0 in de Sitter space corresponds to the worldline with ξ = 1 and y = z = 0 in Rindler space.
“The horizon at r = r 0 in the static de Sitter space coordinates corresponds to the horizon ξ = 0 in Rindler space, and the worldline r = 0 in de Sitter space corresponds to the worldline with ξ = 1 and y = z = 0 in Rindler space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe Euclidean section of dS/B is a four-sphere S^4 embedded in a five-dimensional flat Euclidean space with points related by an azimuthal rotation with angle β/r0 identified, and there are conical singularities unless β/r0 = 2π.
“The Euclidean section of our multiply connected de Sitter space is a four-sphere S 4 embedded in a five dimensional flat Euclidean space with those points related by an azimuthal rotation with angle β/r 0 being identified.There are conical singularities unless β/r 0 = 2π.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningUnder the identification generated by the boost transformation, dS/B has closed timelike curves in regions R and L, but has no closed causal curves in regions F and P.
“Under the identification generated by the boost transformation, clearly dS/B has CTCs in regions R and L, but has no closed causal curves in regions F and P.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningA spacetime obtained from Minkowski spacetime by identifying points related by time translation is closed in the time direction, has no Cauchy horizon, and all events in it are threaded by CTCs.
“Such a spacetime is closed in the time direction and has no Cauchy horizon.All events in this spacetime are threaded by CTCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor a particle detector moving along a worldline with r, θ, φ = constants in region R, the response function F(ΔE) is zero and no particles are detected.
“Therefore the response function F (∆E) is zero and no particles are detected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAs T → ∞ (or L → ∞), the n ≠ 0 contribution exponentially drops to zero; therefore, at events far from the Cauchy horizon in F, the detector only perceives pure Hawking radiation, the same as in case 2.
“As T → ∞ (or L → ∞), d dT n =0 F n exponentially drops to zero; therefore, at events far from the Cauchy horizon in F , the particle detector only perceives pure Hawking radiation (the same as that in case 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe boundaries at W = ±V and X^2 + Y^2 + Z^2 = r0^2 are Cauchy horizons separating causal regions F and P from acausal regions R and L, and are generated by closed null geodesics.
“The boundaries at W = ±V and X 2 + Y 2 + Z 2 = r 2 0 are the Cauchy horizons which separate the causal regions F and P from the acausal regions R and L and are generated by closed null geodesics (Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationdS/B solves the semiclassical Einstein equations with a cosmological constant Λ and the energy-momentum tensor in Eq. (97), and thus is self-consistent, if r0^2 = (3/(2Λ))(1 ± sqrt(1 - Λ/(270π))).
“Similarly, our multiply connected de Sitter space solves the semiclassical Einstein's equations with a cosmological constant Λ and the energy-momentum tensor in Eq. ( 97) (and thus it is self-consistent) if r 2 0 = 3 2Λ 1 ± 1 -Λ 270π (if Λ = 0, we have the two solutions r 2 0 = 1/360π and r 0 = ∞ [89]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor a particle detector moving along a comoving worldline in the steady-state coordinate system, when the detector is in region R, dF/dT = 0, so it sees nothing while it is in region R.
“Obviously in region R all poles are in the upper-half plane of complex ∆τ .Therefore dF dT = 0, (134 ) when the particle detector is in region R.So the particle detector sees nothing while it is in region R.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor electromagnetic fields, T^a_a = 0, so only T_ab T^ab need be considered; for T_ab in Eq. (138), T_ab T^ab = 0.
“For electromagnetic fields we always have T a a = 0, so we need only consider T ab T ab .For T ab in Eq. ( 138), we also have T ab T ab = 0. (141 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningInserting Eq. (32) into Eq. (88) and using Eqs. (79-83), one obtains the energy-momentum tensor for the adapted conformal Rindler vacuum of a conformally coupled scalar field in dS/B, given by Eq. (95).
“Inserting Eq. ( 32) into Eq.( 88) and using Eqs.(79-83), we obtain the energy-momentum tensor for the adapted conformal Rindler vacuum of a conformally coupled scalar field in our multiply connected de Sitter space”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
FindingreasoningFor a particle detector moving along a geodesic with l, θ, φ = constant in region F, the contribution of the n = 0 term is just the Hawking radiation with the Gibbons-Hawking temperature T_G-H = 1/(2πr0) in simply connected de Sitter space.
“We see that the contribution of the n = 0 term is just the Hawking radiation with the Gibbons-Hawking temperature T G-H = 1/2πr 0 in the simply connected de Sitter space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningA necessary condition for a bubble formed in F not to collide with itself is that from time τ when the bubble forms to future infinity a light signal moving along the l direction propagates a co-moving distance less than β/2, which leads to τ > τ0 ≡ r0 ln((e^{b/2}+1)/(e^{b/2}-1)).
“A necessary condition for a bubble formed in F not to collide with itself is that from time τ when the bubble forms to future infinity (τ → ∞) a light signal moving along the l direction [where τ and l are defined in Eq. ( 69) and Eq. ( 71)] propagates a co-moving distance less than β/2, which leads to the condition that τ > τ 0 ≡ r 0 ln e b/2 +1 e b/2 -1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor b = 2π, τ0 ≈ 0.086 r0, V_II ≈ 0.011 V_I, and thus P_II ≈ 0.011 P_I.
“For b = 2π we have τ 0 ≃ 0.086r 0 , V II ≃ 0.011V II , and thus P II ≃ 0.011P I .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningF + R is a Hausdorff manifold with a null boundary, and thus F + R is geodesically incomplete to the past.
“F + R is a Hausdorff manifold with a null boundary, and thus F + R is geodesically incomplete to the past.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenRegions 0 < a < a1 and a > a2 are classically allowed, region a1 < a < a2 is classically forbidden.
“Regions 0 < a < a1 and a > a2 are classically allowed, region a1 < a < a2 is classically forbidden.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataOne copy of this Euclidean bouncing solution has two boundaries with minimum radius a1.
“One “copy” of this Euclidean bouncing solution is shown in this diagram, which has two boundaries with minimum radius a1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenWith our adapted conformal Rindler vacuum, our multiply connected de Sitter space is cold (with zero temperature) in R and L, but hot (with the Gibbons-Hawking temperature) in F and P.
“With our adapted conformal Rindler vacuum, our multiply connected de Sitter space is cold (with zero temperature) in R and L, but hot (with the Gibbons-Hawking temperature) in F and P.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn Fig. 4b, region F + R is partially bounded by two null surfaces, the lower one is the future light cone of an event E, and the upper one is the future light cone of an event E′ which is identified with E under the action of a boost.
“In Fig. 4b region F + R is partially bounded by two null surfaces, the lower one is the future light cone of an event E, and the upper one is the future future light cone of an event E ′ which is identified with E under the action of a boost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThis model has no earliest event and some timelike geodesics infinitely extendible to the past, but is nevertheless geodesically incomplete to the past.
“Interestingly, this model, although having no earliest event and having some timelike geodesics that are infinitely extendible to the past, is nevertheless geodesically incomplete to the past.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe fundamental cells R and L have a finite four-volume, whereas the fundamental cells F and P have an infinite four-volume.
“The fundamental cells R and L have a finite four-volume, whereas the fundamental cells F and P (which extend infinitely to the future and the past, respectively) have an infinite four-volume.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe potentials in R and L cannot be both retarded or both advanced, otherwise the collision of two waves from R and L respectively will destroy the Cauchy horizon.
“But the potentials in R and L cannot be both retarded or both advanced, otherwise the “collision” of two waves from R and L respectively will destroy the Cauchy horizon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenRegion P + L is partially bounded by the past light cone of an event F and the past light cone of an event F′ which is identified with F under the action of a boost.
“Region P + L is partially bounded by the past light cone of an event F and the past light cone of of an event F ′ which is identified with F under the action of a boost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThese two bubble universes both form after the Cauchy horizon CH as do an infinite number of others.
“These two bubble universes both form after the Cauchy horizon CH as do an infinite number of others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenN1N2 is a CTC; CTCs occur on the N1N2 side of the Cauchy horizon CH.
“N1N2 is a CTC; CTCs occur on the N1N2 side of the Cauchy horizon CH.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenInside bubble A the cosmological constant is Λ1.
“Inside bubble A the cosmological constant is Λ1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenIn a region of cosmological constant Λ1, a bubble B of cosmological constant Λ2 is formed by tunneling at the epoch BB1.
“In a region of cosmological constant Λ1, a bubble B of cosmological constant Λ2 is formed by tunneling at the epoch BB1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenAt a later time, within bubble B a bubble A forms at epoch AA1 by tunneling.
“At a later time, within bubble B a bubble A forms at epoch AA1 by tunneling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenTo produce a region of CTCs, the universe must, at some later time, be able to reproduce conditions as they were earlier, so that a multiply connected solution is possible.
“To produce such a region of CTCs, the universe must, at some later time, be able to reproduce conditions as they were earlier, so that a multiply connected solution is possible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The early universe contains a region of CTCs.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationLi and Gott found that there is a self-consistent vacuum in Misner space for which the renormalized energy-momentum tensor of vacuum polarization is zero everywhere.
“In particular, Li and Gott [30] have recently found that there is a self-consistent vacuum in Misner space for which the renormalized energy-momentum tensor of vacuum polarization is zero everywhere.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSince an infinite number of baby universes are created, as long as the probability of a particular multiple connection forming is not exactly zero, then such a connection might be expected, eventually.
“Since an infinite number of baby universes are created, as long as the probability of a particular multiple connection forming is not exactly zero, then such a connection might be expected, eventually.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The probability of a particular multiple connection forming is not exactly zero.
- Rests on an assumption: An infinite number of baby universes are created.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationHawking proposed the chronology protection conjecture, which states that the laws of physics do not allow the appearance of CTCs.
“Some of these results motivated Hawking [19,20] to propose the chronology protection conjecture which states that the laws of physics do not allow the appearance of CTCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [19]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThen the Universe neither tunneled from nothing, nor arose from a singularity; it created itself.
“Then the Universe neither tunneled from nothing, nor arose from a singularity; it created itself (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The early universe contains a region of CTCs.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The probability of a particular multiple connection forming is not exactly zero.
- Rests on an assumption: An infinite number of baby universes are created.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationGott noted that what was needed to produce a realistic open model with Ω of a few tenths today was to have the inflation continue inside the bubble for about 67 e-folding times.
“Gott [89] noted that what was needed to produce a realistic open model with Ω of a few tenths today was to have the inflation continue inside the bubble for about 67 e-folding times.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHawking has noted that in this case, in Hartle and Hawking's formulation, the point (V=-r0, W=0, X=0, Y=0, Z=0) is not special, the curvature does not blow up there: it is like other points in the Euclidean hemispherical section.
“Hawking has noted that in this case, in Hartle and Hawking's formulation, the point (V = -r 0 , W = 0, X = 0, Y = 0, Z = 0) is not special, the curvature does not blow up there: it is like other points in the Euclidean hemispherical section [13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningData on cosmic microwave background fluctuations for spherical harmonic modes from l=2 to l=500 will provide a strong test of these models.
“Data on cosmic microwave background fluctuations for spherical harmonic modes from l = 2 to l = 500 will provide a strong test of these models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIf τ1 = 67r0, then Ω is a few tenths today; if τ1 ≫ 67r0, then Ω ≃ 1 today.
“If τ 1 = 67r 0 , then Ω is a few tenths today; if τ 1 ≫ 67r 0 , then Ω ≃ 1 today [89].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIf shorter roll-down times were more probable than large ones, we might not be surprised to find ourselves in a model which had Ω of a few tenths.
“if shorter roll-down times were more probable than large ones, we might not be surprised to find ourselves in a model which had Ω of a few tenths”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningA complete de Sitter space may be covered with an S^3 coordinate system (a k=1 cosmology) whose radius varies as a(t)=r0 cosh(t/r0) so that for early times (t<0) the universe would be contracting and bubbles would quickly collide preventing the inflation from ever reaching t=0.
“Recall that a complete de Sitter space may be covered with an S 3 coordinate system (a k = 1 cosmology) whose radius varies as a(t) = r 0 cosh(t/r 0 ) so that for early times (t < 0) the universe would be contracting and bubbles would quickly collide preventing the inflation from ever reaching t = 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWith COBE normalization, with Ω=1, (δM/M)_{8h^-1 Mpc}=1.1-1.5 and this would require galaxies to be anti-biased and would lead to an excess of large-separation gravitational lenses over those observed.
“With the COBE normalization there is also the problem that with Ω = 1, (δM/M ) 8h -1 Mpc = 1.1 -1.5 and this would require galaxies to be anti-biased [since for galaxies (δM/M ) 8h -1 Mpc = 1] and would also lead to an excess of large-separation gravitational lenses over those observed [117].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [117]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThus, our universe was one of the bubbles and this solved the problem of Guth's inflation that in general one expected the bubbles not to percolate.
“Thus, our universe was one of the bubbles and this solved the problem of Guth's inflation that in general one expected the bubbles not to percolate [94,95].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [94]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [95]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIndividual bubbles could tunnel across the barrier at different values of φ, and hence have different roll-down times τ1 and thus different values of Ω.
“Then individual bubbles could tunnel across the barrier at different values of φ, and hence have different roll-down times τ 1 and thus different values of Ω.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf we observe Ω < 1 and Ω_Λ = 0, then k = -1 and we need inflation more than ever; we still need it to explain the isotropy of the microwave background radiation and we would now have a large but finite radius of curvature to explain, which 67 e-folds of inflation could naturally produce.
“If we observe Ω < 1 and Ω Λ = 0, then k = -1 and we need inflation more than ever -we still need it to explain the isotropy of the microwave background radiation and we would now have a large but finite radius of curvature to explain, which 67 e-folds of inflation could naturally produce.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWe require h<0.56 if Ω=1, but a more acceptable h<0.65 if Ω=0.4, ΩΛ=0.
“we require h < 0.56 if Ω = 1, but a more acceptable h < 0.65 if Ω = 0.4, Ω Λ = 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe time-reversed version of this process would show tunneling from a point at (V=-r0, W=0, X=0, Y=0, Z=0) to a three sphere at V=0 of radius r0 which then expands with proper time like a(t)=r0 cosh(t/r0) giving a normal de Sitter space, thus Vilenkin's universe created from nothing is obtained.
“The time-reversed version of this process would show tunneling from a point at (V = -r 0 , W = 0, X = 0, Y = 0, Z = 0) to a three sphere at V = 0 of radius r 0 which then expands with proper time like a(t) = r 0 cosh(t/r 0 ) giving a normal de Sitter space -thus Vilenkin's universe created from nothing is obtained [11].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis produces Hawking radiation; and, if r0 is of order the Planck length, then the Gibbons-Hawking thermal state should be dynamically important.
“This produces Hawking radiation; and, if r 0 is of order the Planck length, then the Gibbons-Hawking thermal state [100] (which looks like a cosmological constant due to the trace anomaly [101]) should be dynamically important [89].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [100]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [101]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThey then have to explain the small ratio of the cosmological constant to the Planck density (10^-120).
“They then have to explain the small ratio of the cosmological constant to the Planck density (10 -120 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningCurrently we do not have such a natural explanation for a small yet finite Λ as inflation naturally provides for explaining why the radius of curvature should be a big number in the k=-1 case.
“Currently we do not have such a natural explanation for a small yet finite Λ as inflation naturally provides for explaining why the radius of curvature should be a big number in the k = -1 case.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf it starts with a three-sphere of radius r0 at time t=0, and after that expands like a(t)=r0 cosh(t/r0), the bubbles do not percolate (given that the bubble formation rate per four volume r0^4 is ε≪1) and the inflation continues eternally to t=∞ producing an infinite number of open bubble universes.
“If it starts with a three-sphere of radius r 0 at time t = 0, and after that expands like a(t) = r 0 cosh(t/r 0 ), the bubbles do not percolate (given that the bubble formation rate per four volume r 4 0 is ǫ ≪ 1) and the inflation continues eternally to t = ∞ producing an infinite number of open bubble universes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The bubble formation rate per unit four volume r0^4 is ε≪1.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIf h>0.55 this implies Ω<0.55, which agrees with the age argument and measured masses in groups and clusters of galaxies.
“If h > 0.55 this implies Ω < 0.55, which also agrees with what one would deduce from the age argument as well as the measured masses in groups and clusters of galaxies [116].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [116]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKochanek was able to set a 95% confidence lower limit of 0.34<Ω in flat models where Ω+ΩΛ=1, and a 90% confidence lower limit 0.15<Ω in open models with ΩΛ=0.
“Kochanek [121] was able to set a 95% confidence lower limit of 0.34 < Ω in flat models where Ω + Ω Λ = 1, and a 90% confidence lower limit 0.15 < Ω in open models with Ω Λ = 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [121]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe fine tuning in these models is only logarithmic and therefore not so serious.
“Importantly, they have explained [104,105] that the fine tuning in these models is only “logarithmic” and, therefore, not so serious.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [104]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [105]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationVilenkin suggested that the initial spherical S^3 universe could be formed from quantum tunneling.
“Vilenkin [11] suggested that it could be formed from quantum tunneling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIf the inflation within the bubble is of order 67 e-folds, then we can have Ω of a few tenths; but if it is longer than that, we will usually see Ω near 1 today.
“If the inflation within the bubble is of order 67 e-folds, then we can have Ω of a few tenths; but if it is longer than that, we will usually see Ω near 1 today.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For the rest of the paper, the authors assume single-bubble open inflationary models for our Big Bang universe.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn this picture our universe (our bubble) is only 12 billion years old, but the Universe as a whole (the entire bubble forming inflationary state) is of a finite but arbitrarily old age.
“In this picture our universe (our bubble) is only 12 billion years old, but the Universe as a whole (the entire bubble forming inflationary state) is of a finite but arbitrarily old age.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent estimates of h include h=0.65±0.06, 0.68≤h≤0.77, 0.55≤h≤0.61, and h=0.64±0.06.
“A number of recent estimates of h (the present Hubble constant in units of 100 km s -1 Mpc -1 ) have been made (i.e., h = 0.65 ± 0.06 [111], 0.68 ≤ h ≤ 0.77 [112], 0.55 ≤ h ≤ 0.61 [113], and h = 0.64 ± 0.06 [114]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [111]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [112]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [113]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGott noted that this solution looks just like the interior of a Coleman bubble.
“Gott [89] noted that this solution looks just like the interior of a Coleman bubble [92].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [92]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenSince there does not exist a self-consistent quantum theory of gravity at present, we cannot judge who (Hawking or Kim and Thorne) is right.
“Since there does not exist a self-consistent quantum theory of gravity at present, we cannot judge who (Hawking or Kim and Thorne) is right.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationLi has argued that material will become opaque for waves or particles with extremely high frequency or energy, because absorption from scattering processes becomes very important.
“Based on these examples, Li [26] has argued that material will become opaque for waves (particles) with extremely high frequency or energy, since in such cases the absorption caused by various types of scattering processes becomes very important.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLi and Gott have found that this quantum state is the adapted Rindler vacuum and is self-consistent because it solves the semiclassical Einstein equations exactly.
“Li and Gott [30] have found that this quantum state is the “adapted” Rindler vacuum (i.e. the usual Rindler vacuum with multiple images) and it is a self-consistent vacuum state because it solves the semiclassical Einstein's equations exactly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationVilenkin universe was supposed to be created from 'nothing', where according to Vilenkin 'nothing' means 'a state with no classical spacetime'.
“The Vilenkin universe was supposed to be created from “nothing”, where according to Vilenkin “nothing” means “a state with no classical spacetime” [135].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [135]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationBased on some of these calculations, Hawking has proposed the chronology protection conjecture which states that the laws of physics do not allow the appearance of CTCs.
“Based on some of these calculations, Hawking [19,20] has proposed the chronology protection conjecture which states that the laws of physics do not allow the appearance of CTCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [19]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUsing a simple example of a space with a region with CTCs separated from a region without closed causal curves by a complex geometric region, Li, Xu, and Liu have shown that in such a space the energy-momentum tensor of vacuum polarization is finite everywhere and the chronology protection conjecture has been challenged.
“And, using a simple example of a space with a region with CTCs separated from a region without closed causal curves by a complex geometric region, Li, Xu, and Liu [22] have shown that in such a space the energy-momentum tensor of vacuum polarization is finite everywhere and the chronology protection conjecture has been challenged.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLi and Gott have also found that for the adapted Rindler vacuum in Misner space, an inertial particle detector perceives nothing.
“Li and Gott [30] have also found that for this “adapted” Rindler vacuum in Misner space, an inertial particle detector perceives nothing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn such a case the spacetime contains neither closed null geodesics nor closed timelike geodesics, though it contains both closed timelike non-geodesic curves and closed null non-geodesic curves.
“In such a case the spacetime contains neither closed null geodesics nor closed timelike geodesics, though it contains both closed timelike non-geodesic curves and closed null non-geodesic curves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe back-reaction of vacuum polarization may not destroy the Cauchy horizon in spacetimes with CTCs, and thus such spacetimes can be stable against vacuum polarization.
“The above arguments indicate that the back-reaction of vacuum polarization may not destroy the Cauchy horizon in spacetimes with CTCs, and thus such spacetimes can be stable against vacuum polarization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSushkov has found that for an automorphic complex scalar field in Misner space there is a vacuum state for which the energy-momentum tensor is zero everywhere.
“Sushkov [28] has found that for an automorphic complex scalar field in Misner space there is a vacuum state for which the energy-momentum tensor is zero everywhere.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAs one approaches the Cauchy horizon the thermodynamic limit has already been violated and ordinary thermodynamics should be revised near the Cauchy horizon.
“Thus, as one approaches the Cauchy horizon the thermodynamic limit has already been violated and ordinary thermodynamics should be revised near the Cauchy horizon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Ordinary continuous thermodynamics holds only for the case with N ≫ 1.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThe probability for the particle staying in the well is much greater than the probability for the particle running out of the barrier.
“The probability for the particle staying in the well is much greater than the probability for the particle running out of the barrier.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHawking noted that one would expect the quantum gravitational cut-off to occur when the invariant distance from the Cauchy horizon was of order the Planck length, and this would give a very strong perturbation on the metric so that the Cauchy horizon would be destroyed.
“But, Hawking [20] noted that one would expect the quantum gravitational cut-off to occur when the invariant distance from the Cauchy horizon was of order the Planck length, and this would give a very strong perturbation on the metric so that the Cauchy horizon would be destroyed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBy quantum processes, a time traveler may tunnel from the region without closed causal curves to the region with CTCs (or vice versa), and the spacetime itself can also tunnel from one side to the other side of the quantum barrier.
“By quantum processes, a time traveler may tunnel from the region without closed causal curves to the region with CTCs (or vice versa), and the spacetime itself can also tunnel from one side to the other side of the quantum barrier [22].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCassidy and Hawking have argued that the number of states may enforce the chronology protection conjecture because this quantity tends to zero as one tries to introduce CTCs.
“On the other hand, Cassidy and Hawking [143] have argued that the “number of states” may enforce the chronology protection conjecture since “this quantity will always tend to zero as one tries to introduce CTCs”.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [143]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLi has argued that if an absorbing material with appropriate density is introduced, vacuum polarization may be smoothed out near the Cauchy horizon so that metric perturbation from vacuum fluctuations is very small and a spacetime with CTCs can be stable against vacuum polarization.
“Based on calculation of the renormalized energy-momentum tensor and the fluctuation in the metric, Li [26] has argued that if an absorbing material with appropriate density is introduced, vacuum polarization may be smoothed out near the Cauchy horizon so that the metric perturbation caused by vacuum fluctuations will be very small and a spacetime with CTCs can be stable against vacuum polarization”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThorne has noted that, even if Hawking's quantum gravitational cut-off argument is correct, using two wormholes can make metric fluctuations near the Cauchy horizon arbitrarily small, so a spacetime with CTCs created from two wormholes can be stable against vacuum polarization.
“Thorne [9] has noted that, even if Hawking's argument that a quantum gravitational cut-off would occur when the geometric invariant distance from the Cauchy horizon is of order the Planck length is correct, by using two wormholes the metric fluctuations near the Cauchy horizon can be made arbitrarily small so a spacetime with CTCs created from two wormholes can be stable against vacuum polar”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKay, Radzikowski, and Wald have argued that their results may be interpreted as indicating that in order to create CTCs it would be necessary to enter a regime where quantum effects of gravity will be dominant.
“Kay, Radzikowski, and Wald [144] have also argued that their results may be interpreted as indicating that in order to create CTCs it would be necessary to enter a regime where quantum effects of gravity will be dominant (see also the discussions of Visser [148,149]); this is also consistent with Li, Xu, and Liu's arguments [22].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [144]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [148]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [149]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationLi has shown that the appearance of an absorber in a spacetime with CTCs may make the spacetime stable against vacuum polarization.
“Recently, with a very general argument, Li [26] has shown that the appearance of an absorber in a spacetime with CTCs may make the spacetime stable against vacuum polarization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf the probability and current are conserved, there must be a finite probability for the universe being in the state before tunneling (i.e., a=0) and this probability is much bigger than the probability for tunneling.
“If the probability and current are conserved (in fact there does exist a conserved current for the Wheeler-DeWitt equation [137], and a classically allowed solution with a = 0 and zero “energy”), there must be a finite probability for the universe being in the state before tunneling (i.e., a = 0) and this probability is much bigger than the probability for tunneling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [137]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFor the particular spacetime with CTCs constructed by Cassidy and Hawking, the entropy of a massless scalar field diverges to minus infinity when the spacetime develops CTCs.
“Their arguments are based on the fact that for the particular spacetime with CTCs they constructed [which is the product of a multiply connected (via a boost) three-dimensional de Sitter space and S 1 ] the entropy of a massless scalar field diverges to minus infinity when the spacetime develops CTCs [143].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [143]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe energy of the particle in the well cannot be zero, otherwise the uncertainty principle is violated; thus there is always a finite zero-point-energy.
“The energy of the particle in the well cannot be zero, otherwise the uncertainty principle is violated.Thus there is always a finite zero-point-energy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKim and Thorne claimed that quantum gravitational effects would cut the divergence off when an observer's proper time from crossing the Cauchy horizon was the Planck time, and this would only give such a small perturbation on the metric that the Cauchy horizon could not be destroyed.
“Kim and Thorne claimed that quantum gravitational effects would cut the divergence off when an observer's proper time from crossing the Cauchy horizon was the Planck time, and this would only give such a small perturbation on the metric that the Cauchy horizon could not be destroyed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLi, Xu, and Liu have argued that if the effects of quantum gravity are considered, in a spacetime with CTCs the region with CTCs and the region without closed causal curves may be separated by a quantum barrier (e.g. a region where components of the metric have complex values) instead of a Cauchy horizon generated by closed null geodesics.
“Li, Xu, and Liu [22] have argued that if the effects of quantum gravity are considered, in a spacetime with CTCs the region with CTCs and the region without closed causal curves may be separated by a quantum barrier (e.g. a region where components of the metric have complex values) instead of a Cauchy horizon generated by closed null geodesics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCassidy and Li and Gott have independently found that for the real conformally coupled scalar field in Misner space there exists a quantum state for which the energy-momentum tensor is zero everywhere.
“More recently, Cassidy [31] and Li and Gott [30] have independently found that for the real conformally coupled scalar field in Misner space there exists a quantum state for which the energy-momentum tensor is zero everywhere.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [31]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf the Universe is created from something, that something could have been itself; thus it is possible that the Universe is its own mother.
“On the other hand, if the Universe is created from something, that something could have been itself.Thus it is possible that the Universe is its own mother.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe divergence of the energy-momentum tensor at the Cauchy horizon does not mean that the Cauchy horizon must be destroyed by the back-reaction of vacuum polarization, but instead means that near the Cauchy horizon the usual quantum field theory on a prescribed classical spacetime background cannot be used and the quantum effect of gravity must be considered.
“(2) the divergence of the energy-momentum tensor at the Cauchy horizon does not mean that the Cauchy horizon must be destroyed by the back-reaction of vacuum polarization, but instead means that near the Cauchy horizon the usual quantum field theory on a prescribed classical spacetime background cannot be used and the quantum effect of gravity must be considered.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe entropy cannot continuously tend to negative infinity; it should jump from k_B ln 3 to k_B ln 2, jump from k_B ln 2 to zero, and then stand on zero as one approaches the Cauchy horizon.
“The entropy cannot continuously tend to negative infinity; it should jump from k B ln 3 to k B ln 2, jump from k B ln 2 to zero (but in Cassidy and Hawking's arguments [143] we have not seen such a jump), then the uncertainty principle demands that the entropy should stand on the zero value as one approaches the Cauchy horizon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [143]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: In ordinary statistical thermodynamics, entropy is always positive.
- Rests on an assumption: The uncertainty principle requires ∆p_i ∆q_i ≥ 2πh.
- Rests on an assumption: The number of states N is always an integer.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIn the self-consistent case, T_ab^ren = -g_ab/(960π^2 r0^4) itself is the source term producing the de Sitter geometry, and this may give rise to inflation at the Planck scale.
“In this self-consistent case, T ab ren = -g ab /960π 2 r 4 0 itself is the source term producing the de Sitter geometry [89].This may give rise to inflation at the Planck scale [89].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor a conformally coupled scalar field in a conformally flat spacetime, the Green function of the conformal vacuum and the renormalized energy-momentum tensors are related to their flat-spacetime counterparts by Eq. (84) and Eq. (85).
“For a conformally coupled scalar field in a conformally flat spacetime, the Green function G(X, X ′ ) of the conformal vacuum is related to the corresponding Green function G(X, X ′ ) in the flat spacetime by [153]”
- Also stated in: § B. Conformal Relation between Our Multiply Connected de Sitter Space and Misner Space · plain
“the renormalized energy-momentum tensors are related by [153]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [153]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § B. Conformal Relation between Our Multiply Connected de Sitter Space and Misner Space · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn simply connected de Sitter space, an inertial particle detector perceives thermal radiation with the Gibbons-Hawking temperature if the conformally coupled scalar field is in the conformal Minkowski vacuum.
“It is well known that in the simply connected de Sitter space, an inertial particle detector perceives thermal radiation with the Gibbons-Hawking temperature [Eq.( 56)] if the conformally coupled scalar field is in the conformal Minkowski vacuum [100,153].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [100]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [153]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn the b = 2π case, the vacuum Einstein equations without cosmological constant are automatically satisfied, so this is an example of a spacetime with CTCs at the semiclassical quantum gravity level.
“In such a case, the vacuum Einstein's equations without cosmological constant are automatically satisfied.Thus this is an example of a spacetime with CTCs at the semiclassical quantum gravity level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe ill-definedness of the energy-momentum tensor on the Cauchy horizon only happens in a set of measure zero, which does not make much sense in physics; if the renormalized energy-momentum tensor is zero everywhere except on a set of measure zero where it is formally ill-defined, continuity would seem to require setting it to zero there also.
“But we note that this only happens in a set of measure zero which does not make much sense in physics for if the renormalized energy-momentum tensor is zero everywhere except on a set of measure zero where it is formally ill-defined, then continuity would seem to require setting it to zero there also [30].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA particle detector cannot distinguish Vilenkin's tunneling universe from an eternal de Sitter space, and they have the same energy-momentum tensor for the conformally coupled scalar field.
“Though the boundary between the Lorentzian section and the Euclidean section behaves as a reflecting boundary, a particle detector cannot distinguish Vilenkin's tunneling universe from an eternal de Sitter space, and they have the same energy-momentum tensor for the conformally coupled scalar field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationGott called the vacuum state in de Sitter space with r0 = (360π)^(-1/2) the self-consistent vacuum state, and it has a Gibbons-Hawking thermal temperature T_G-H = 1/(2πr0).
“Gott [89] has called the vacuum state in de Sitter space with r 0 = (360π) -1/2 the self-consistent vacuum state (it has a Gibbons-Hawking thermal temperature T G-H = 1/2πr 0 ) [100].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [100]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe adapted Minkowski vacuum is not self-consistent for Misner space; it does not solve Einstein's equations given the Misner space geometry.
“This indicates that though the Minkowski vacuum is a good and self-consistent vacuum for simply connected Minkowski space, the adapted Minkowski vacuum is not self-consistent for Misner space (i.e. it does not solve Einstein's equations given the Misner space geometry).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDe Sitter space is a solution of the vacuum Einstein equations with a positive cosmological constant Λ and is one of the maximally symmetric spacetimes.
“De Sitter space is a solution of the vacuum Einstein's equations with a positive cosmological constant Λ, which is one of the maximally symmetric spacetimes (the others being Minkowski space and anti-de Sitter space) [39,40].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [39]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [40]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe quotient of the bundle of linear frames over de Sitter space by the boost group is a Hausdorff manifold and is well-behaved everywhere.
“However, as in Hawking and Ellis's arguments for Misner space [40], the quotient of the bundle of linear frames over de Sitter space by the boost group is a Hausdorff manifold and thus is well-behaved everywhere.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThere must be a correlation between time arrows in region L and region R: if the retarded potential is chosen in R, the advanced potential must be chosen in L; if the advanced potential is chosen in R, the retarded potential must be chosen in L.
“Furthermore, there must be a correlation between time arrows in region L and region R: if we choose the retarded potential in R, we must choose the advanced potential in L (see Fig. 6b); if we choose the advanced potential in R, we must choose the retarded potential in L.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationLi [26] has calculated the renormalized energy-momentum tensor of vacuum polarization with the effect of absorption.
“Li [26] has calculated the renormalized energy-momentum tensor of vacuum polarization with the effect of absorption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSuch a metastable vacuum inflates, and an infinite number of bubble universes form later, with perhaps many different laws of physics depending on how they tunnel away from the metastable vacuum and which of the many potential minima they roll down into.
“But then, such a metastable vacuum inflates in the knob, and an infinite number of bubble universes form later, with perhaps many different laws of physics depending on how they tunnel away from the metastable vacuum and which of the many potential minima they roll down into.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHawking's argument works only if one can pick a particular frame like the frame of a timelike observer crossing the Cauchy horizons and observe the blow up of the energy in that frame; thus Hawking's approach is observer-dependent, while our approach with T_ab T^ab is observer-independent.
“Hawking's argument works only if one can pick a particular frame like the frame of a timelike observer crossing the Cauchy horizons and observe the blow up of the energy in that frame.(Thus Hawking's approach is observer-dependent, while our approach with T ab T ab is observer-independent.)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn the scenario where the first universe is one of the infinite ones formed later by intelligent civilizations, the Universe would be multiply connected and would have a region of CTCs.
“Then the Universe -note capital U -would be multiply connected, and would have a region of CTCs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: One of the created baby universes is the original universe that one started with.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe principle of self-consistency produces classical stability of the Cauchy horizons and naturally gives rise to an arrow of time in our model of the Universe.
“Thus, the principle of self-consistency [178,179] produces classical stability of the Cauchy horizons and naturally gives rise to an arrow of time in our model of the Universe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [178]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [179]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningF and R can have retarded potentials, while P and L have advanced potentials.
“F and R can have retarded potentials, while P and L have advanced potentials, as we have noted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIf we observe a coincidence in physical constants, according to Carter [62], it simply means that if it were otherwise, we would not be here.
“If we observe such a coincidence, according to Carter [62], it simply means that if it were otherwise, we would not be here.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThere is no instability caused by particles crossing the Cauchy horizons; and since there are no timelike observers in region R to be hit by photons as the Cauchy horizon separating R from P is approached, there is no instability, as indicated by T_ab T^ab not blowing up as that Cauchy horizon is approached.
“Thus, there is no instability caused by particles crossing the Cauchy horizons; and since there are no timelike observers in region R to be hit by photons as the Cauchy horizon separating R from P is approached, there is no instability, as indicated by the fact T ab T ab does not blow up as that Cauchy horizon is approached.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHarrison's model could occur in many generations, making it likely that we were produced as great, great, ..., great grandchildren universes from a sequence of intelligent civilizations.
“Harrison's model could occur in many generations, making it likely that we were produced as great, great, ..., great grandchildren universes from a sequence of intelligent civilizations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAs Farhi, Guth, and Guven [32] note, the probability for forming such a universe is exponentially small, so an exponentially large number of trials would be required before an intelligent civilization would achieve this feat.
“As Farhi, Guth, and Guven [32] note, the probability for forming such a universe is exponentially small, so an exponentially large number of trials would be required before an intelligent civilization would achieve this feat.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenUsing the method of images, the N-th image is from N cycles around the multiply connected spacetime.
“Using the method of images, note that the N -th image is from N cycles around the multiply connected spacetime.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe de Sitter solution then bounces and becomes an expanding de Sitter solution which can spawn an infinite number of open bubble universes.
“The de Sitter solution then bounces and becomes an expanding de Sitter solution which can in turn spawn an infinite number of open bubble universes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationHarrison [33] noted correctly that if super-civilizations in a universe can create many baby universes, then baby universes created in this way should greatly outnumber the parent universes.
“He noted correctly that if super-civilizations in a universe can create many baby universes, then baby universes created in this way should greatly outnumber the parent universes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningF + R and P + L are both stable and causally disconnected from each other.
“Thus, we expect F + R and P + L to both be stable, and causally disconnected from each other.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe renormalized energy-momentum tensor does not blow up at the Cauchy horizon, so that a self-consistent solution is possible.
“It would seem that it can be arranged that the renormalized energy-momentum tensor does not blow up on this Cauchy horizon so that a self-consistent solution is possible.”
- Also stated in: § X. BABY UNIVERSE MODELS · hedged
“Thus, we expect that the renormalized energy-momentum tensor will not blow up at the Cauchy horizon [26], so that a self-consistent solution is possible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § X. BABY UNIVERSE MODELS · hedged
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThus, in a wide class of scenarios, the epoch of CTCs would be long over by now, as we would be one of the many later-formed bubble universes.
“Thus, in a wide class of scenarios, the epoch of CTCs would be long over by now, as we would be one of the many later-formed bubble universes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRegion F + R (including the Cauchy horizon separating F from R) forms a causal unit, and region P + L (including the Cauchy horizon separating P from L) forms another causal unit.
“Then region F + R (including the Cauchy horizon separating F from R) forms a causal unit, and region P + L (including the Cauchy horizon separating P from L) forms another causal unit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationYou, being not special, are simply likely to live in one of the many baby universes, because there are so many more of them.
“and that you (being not special) are simply likely to live in one of the many baby universes, because there are so many more of them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAs any black hole collapses, before the curvature reaches the singularity, it will convert into a collapsing de Sitter solution.
“Then, as any black hole collapses, the curvature increases as the singularity is approached; but before getting there it will convert into a collapsing de Sitter solution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf the probability for a civilization to form on a habitable planet like Earth and eventually succeed at creating a universe in the lab is some finite number greater than zero, then our universe, if it is an open bubble universe, should spawn an infinite number of such baby universes.
“In fact, if the probability for a civilization to form on a habitable planet like the Earth and eventually succeed at creating a universe in the lab is some finite number greater than zero (even if it is very low), then our universe (if it is an open bubble universe) should spawn an infinite number of such baby universes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The probability for a civilization to form on a habitable planet like Earth and eventually succeed at creating a universe in the lab is some finite number greater than zero.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Our universe is open.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAccording to the Copernican principle, out of all the places for intelligent observers to be, there are only a few special places and many non-special places, and you are simply more likely to be in one of the many non-special places.
“Here he is using implicitly the formulation of Gott [63] that according to the Copernican principle, out of all the places for intelligent observers to be, there are, by definition, only a few special places and many non-special places, and you are simply more likely to be in one of the many non-special places.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe geodesic incompleteness of F + R may not be important in physics because in the inflationary scenario all real particles are created during the reheating process after inflation within bubbles created in region F and these particles emit only retarded photons which never run off the spacetime because here the geodesic incompleteness takes place only in the past direction.
“But, the geodesic incompleteness of F +R may not be important in physics because in the inflationary scenario all real particles are created during the reheating process after inflation within bubbles created in region F and these particles emit only retarded photons which never run off the spacetime because here the geodesic incompleteness takes place only in the past direction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIf the metastable vacuum is at the Planck density, the number of trials required is expected to be not too large.
“If the metastable vacuum is at the Planck density, the number of trials required is expected to be not too large”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenHarrison's model could occur.
“Harrison's model could occur”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationHarrison's model can explain all the universes by this mechanism except for the first one.
“Harrison [33] was able to explain all the universes by this mechanism except for the first one!”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThere would be a multiply connected region of CTCs bounded by a past Cauchy horizon which would be stable because of the self-consistency requirement as in the previous section, and this would also engender pure retarded potentials.
“There would be a multiply connected region of CTCs bounded by a past Cauchy horizon which would be stable because of the self-consistency requirement as in the previous section, and this would also engender pure retarded potentials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIn this case, the reason that we observe such coincidences is that a previous intelligent civilization made them that way.
“In this case, the reason that we observe such coincidences is that a previous intelligent civilization made them that way.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf our universe is open, it would likely have some super-civilizations powerful enough to succeed at such a creation event, or at least have so many super-civilizations (an infinite number) that even if they each tried only a few times, then some of them (again an infinite number) would succeed.
“and it would likely have some super-civilizations powerful enough to succeed at such a creation event, or at least have so many super-civilizations (an infinite number) that even if they each tried only a few times, then some of them (again an infinite number) would succeed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Our universe is open.
- Rests on an assumption: If our universe is open, it has an infinite number of galaxies.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIn that scenario, all individual universes would owe their birth to some intelligent civilization.
“all of the individual universes would owe their birth to some intelligent civilization in particular in this picture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: One of the created baby universes is the original universe that one started with.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningControlling these phase transitions would seem difficult.
“Controlling these phase transitions would seem difficult.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAccording to Li [23], this kind of spacetime can be stable against vacuum polarization.
“According to Li [23], this kind of spacetime can be stable against vacuum polarization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIn our multiply connected de Sitter space, the arrow of time in region F is in the future direction and the arrow of time in region P is in the past direction.
“In our multiply connected de Sitter space, this is realized, since the arrow of time in region F is in the future direction and the arrow of time in region P is in the past direction”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThere are several different baby universe scenarios, any one of which could accommodate our type of model.
“There are several different baby universe scenarios -any one of which could accommodate our type of model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIf there are many baby universes created by intelligent supercivilizations in an infinite open bubble universe, then you are likely to live in a baby universe created in this way.
“Thus, if there are many baby universes created by intelligent supercivilizations in an infinite open bubble universe, then you are likely to live in a baby universe created in this way.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough these null generators are converging just before the tunneling event, they are diverging just after the tunneling event, having jumped to the other side of the Einstein-Rosen bridge.
“Another novel effect is that although these null generators are converging just before the tunneling event, they are diverging just after the tunneling event, having jumped to the other side of the Einstein-Rosen bridge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe observer sees his side of the Einstein-Rosen bridge and an event horizon at r = 2M which hides the external spacetime at late times from him.
“The observer sees his side of the Einstein-Rosen bridge and an event horizon at r = 2M which hides the external spacetime at late times from him.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThere may be two epochs of inflation, one at the Planck scale caused by T_ab^ren = -g_ab/(960π^2 r0^4) which later decays in region F at τ ≫ τ0 into an inflationary metastable state at the GUT scale produced by a potential V(φ), which, still later, forms bubble universes.
“Also note that there may be two epochs of inflation, one at the Planck scale caused by T ab ren = -g ab /960π 2 r 4 0 [Eq.( 97)] which later decays in region F at τ ≫ τ 0 into an inflationary metastable state at the GUT scale produced by a potential V (φ), which, still later, forms bubble universes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationIf intelligent civilizations made baby universes with such coincidences, then the majority of universes would have laws of physics conducive to the formation of intelligent life.
“If that were the case, then the majority of universes would have laws of physics conducive to the formation of intelligent life.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe stability of the Cauchy horizon requires that the regions with CTCs (R and L) must be confined in the past and in these regions all quantum fields must be in vacuum states.
“the stability of the Cauchy horizon requires that the regions with CTCs (R and L) must be confined in the past and in these regions all quantum fields must be in vacuum states”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe strong anthropic principle as advanced by Carter [62] says that the laws of physics, in our universe at least, must be such as to allow the development of intelligent life.
“The strong anthropic principle as advanced by Carter [62] says that the laws of physics, in our universe at least, must be such as to allow the development of the intelligent life.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis gives rise to an arrow of time and an arrow of entropy in this model.
“This gives rise to an arrow of time and an arrow of entropy in this model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThere are no real particles in regions L and R (because these are vacuum states) and no real particles in regions F and P until the vacuum state there decays by forming bubbles at a timelike separation |τ| > τ0 from the origin.
“There are, as we shall show in the next subsection, no real particles in regions L and R (because these are vacuum states) and no real particles in region F and P until the vacuum state there decays by forming bubbles at a timelike separation |τ | > τ 0 from the origin”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUnder the supposition that one of these open bubble universes is the original open universe where the advanced civilization made the baby de Sitter universe, the model is multiply connected, with no earliest event.
“Now suppose one of these open bubble universes simply turns out to be the original open universe where that advanced civilization made the baby de Sitter universe in the first place (Fig. 7).Now the model is multiply connected, with no earliest event.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: One of these open bubble universes turns out to be the original open universe where the advanced civilization made the baby de Sitter universe.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIf one of these baby universes simply turns out to be the original universe that one started out with, we have a multiply connected solution in many ways similar to our multiply connected de Sitter space.
“If one of these baby universes simply turns out to be the original universe that one started out with, we have a multiply connected solution in many ways similar to our multiply connected de Sitter space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIf such solutions exist, it might be possible to find a solution in which there was an early epoch of CTCs that would be geodesically complete to the past as well by simply identifying an earlier bubble with a later one.
“If such solutions exist, it might be possible to find a solution in which there was an early epoch of CTCs that would be geodesically complete to the past as well by simply identifying an earlier bubble with a later one.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSuch an early region of CTCs could well be over by now, being bounded to the future by a Cauchy horizon.
“Such an early region of CTCs could well be over by now, being bounded to the future by a Cauchy horizon.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The early universe contained a region of CTCs.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGrant space is multiply connected, has T_ab = 0 everywhere, and includes CTCs.
“Grant space is multiply connected, has T ab = 0 everywhere, and includes CTCs.It can be pictured as a cylinder.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIn the special case where Λ1 = Λ2, the recycling steady state solution becomes a simple single de Sitter space geometry with Λ1, and the usual steady-state coordinate system in a single de Sitter space is not geodesically complete to the past.
“However, in the special case, where Λ 1 = Λ 2 , one can show that the recycling steady state solution becomes a simple single de Sitter space geometry with Λ 1 and the usual steady-state coordinate system in a single de Sitter space is not geodesically complete to the past.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese two surfaces are identified creating a periodic boundary condition for P + L, where self-consistency as CH separating P from L is approached requires advanced potentials.
“These two surfaces are identified creating a periodic boundary condition for P + L, where self-consistency as CH separating P from L is approached requires advanced potentials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAfter the Cauchy horizon, for a certain amount of proper time depending on bubble formation probability per four volume r^4_0, no bubbles or real particles form, but eventually the model expands to infinite volume, creating an infinite number of open bubble universes, which do not percolate.
“After the Cauchy horizon for a certain amount of proper time (depending on the bubble formation probability per four volume r 4 0 ) no bubbles (or real particles) form, but eventually this model expands to infinite volume, creating an infinite number of open bubble universes, which do not percolate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis oscillating universe is metastable, so it could not have existed forever; after a finite half-life, it is likely to decay.
“It is metastable, so this oscillating universe could not have existed forever: after a finite half-life, it is likely to decay.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNegative curvature is added each time the genus is increased; positive curvature can be added to reduce the genus by 1.
“Negative curvature is added each time the genus is increased.Conversely, positive curvature can be added to reduce the genus by 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAn entropy arrow of time is automatically produced, with the region of CTCs in the simplest models sitting automatically in a cold vacuum state, with the universe becoming heated after the Cauchy horizon.
“An entropy arrow of time is automatically produced as well, with the region of CTCs in the simplest models sitting automatically in a cold vacuum state, with the universe becoming heated after the Cauchy horizon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSince the zero-point-energy of the conformally coupled scalar field cannot be neglected, the true solution should be that given by diagram 3a, which does not enforce Hartle and Hawking's no-boundary proposal.
“But we argue that since the “zero-point-energy” of the conformally coupled scalar field cannot be neglected, the true solution should be that given by diagram 3a, which does not enforce Hartle and Hawking's no-boundary proposal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningThis four-sphere has no-boundary, which is the basis of Hawking's quantum cosmology.
“This four-sphere has no-boundary, which is the basis of Hawking's quantum cosmology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWith pure retarded potentials throughout, the issue of whether the spacetime was geodesically complete to the past is less compelling, and our model, having a periodic boundary condition, would not need further boundary conditions, unlike a simply connected recycling model that was geodesically incomplete to the past.
“With pure retarded potentials throughout, the issue of whether the spacetime was geodesically complete to the past is less compelling, as we have argued above, and our model, having a periodic boundary condition, would not need further boundary conditions, unlike a simply connected recycling model that was geodesically incomplete to the past.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningIf there is a conformal scalar field φ, then the energy levels should be E_n = n + 1/2, and even for n=0 there is a zero-point-energy.
“If there is a conformal scalar field φ, then the”
- Also stated in: § X. BABY UNIVERSE MODELS · plain
“energy”
- Also stated in: § XI. CONCLUSIONS · plain
“levels should be E n = n + 1 2 .Even for n = 0 there is a”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § X. BABY UNIVERSE MODELS · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenA contracting de Sitter phase would be destroyed by the formation of bubbles which would percolate before the minimum radius was ever reached.
“Besides, a contracting de Sitter phase would be destroyed by the formation of bubbles which would percolate before the minimum radius was ever reached.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCassidy and Hawking have proposed that the formally defined entropy appears to diverge to negative infinity as the Cauchy horizon is approached.
“Recently, Cassidy and Hawking [143] have proposed yet another supposed difficulty for CTCs, in that the formally defined entropy appears to diverge to negative infinity as the Cauchy horizon is approached.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [143]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe original oscillating universe could have formed by a similar tunneling process from a contracting de Sitter phase, but such a phase would have been much more likely to have simply classically bounced to an expanding de Sitter phase instead of tunneling into the oscillating metastable state at the origin.
“The original oscillating universe could have formed by a similar tunneling process from a contracting de Sitter phase, but such a phase would have been much more likely to have simply classically bounced to an expanding de Sitter phase instead of tunneling into the oscillating metastable state at the origin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenGeneral relativity in principle allows solutions with CTCs.
“One of the remarkable properties of the theory of general relativity is that in principle it allows solutions with CTCs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhen the zero-point-energy is neglected, the minimum radius is zero, and one copy of the bouncing Euclidean solution is a four-sphere.
“In this case the minimum radius is zero, and thus one copy of the bouncing Euclidean solution is a four-sphere.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe integrated Gaussian curvature over a sphere (genus=0) is 4π, over a donut (genus=1) is zero, and over a figure 8 pretzel (genus=2) is -4π.
“Thus, the integrated Gaussian curvature over a sphere (genus=0) is 4π, while the integrated Gaussian curvature over a donut (genus=1) is zero, and the integrated Gaussian curvature over a figure 8 pretzel (genus=2) is -4π.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn our model, there would be a strong self-consistency reason for pure retarded potential, whereas in the Garriga-Vilenkin recycling model, there would be no such strong reason for it.
“In our model, there would be a strong self-consistency reason for pure retarded potential, whereas in the Garriga-Vilenkin recycling model, there would be no such strong reason for it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe Universe did not arise out of nothing, but rather created itself.
“In this paper, we consider instead the notion that the Universe did not arise out of nothing, but rather created itself.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The early universe contained a region of CTCs.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAs long as Λ2 > 0, there is a finite but small probability per unit four volume that the Λ2 state could tunnel to form a bubble of Λ1 state, which could inflate, decay into bubbles of Λ2 vacuum, which could recycle forming Λ1 bubbles, and so forth.
“As long as Λ 2 > 0, then Garriga and Vilenkin assert that there is a finite (but small) probability per unit four volume that the Λ 2 state could tunnel to form a bubble of Λ 1 state, which could therefore inflate, decaying into bubbles of Λ 2 vacuum, which could recycle forming Λ 1 bubbles, and so forth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIf the conformally coupled scalar field is in the ground state, it has a zero-point-energy 1/2.
“If the conformally coupled scalar field is in the ground state, it has a “zero-point-energy” 1/2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAs Garriga and Vilenkin have indicated, it would violate no known theorems for some type of recycling universe (making bubble universes within bubble universes ad infinitum) to exist that was geodesically complete to the past.
“Alternatively, as Garriga and Vilenkin have indicated, it would violate no known theorems for some type of recycling universe (making bubble universes within bubble universes ad infinitum) to exist that was geodesically complete to the past.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Garriga and Vilenkin
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenFor a compact two-dimensional surface, the integrated Gaussian curvature divided by 4π equals 1 minus the genus.
“For a compact two dimensional surface, the integrated Gaussian curvature over the surface divided by 4π is equal to 1 minus the genus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenOther counter-examples to the chronology protection conjecture have been found, as discussed in section V.
“Other counter-examples to the chronology protection conjecture have also been found, as discussed in section V.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf the Universe contained an early region of CTCs, there would be no first-cause; every event would have events to its past, and yet the Universe would not have existed eternally in the past.
“If the Universe contained an early region of CTCs, there would be no first-cause.Every event would have events to its past.And yet the Universe would not have existed eternally in the past (see Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The early universe contained a region of CTCs.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIf the zero-point-energy is neglected, the Universe could start out at the metastable minimum as a point with a = 0, tunneling through the barrier out to become a de Sitter universe.
“If the “zero-point-energy” is neglected, the Universe could start out at the metastable minimum as a point with a = 0, tunneling through the barrier out to become a de Sitter universe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenFor such a model to work, the Universe has to reproduce at some later time the same conditions that obtained at an earlier time.
“For such a model to work the Universe has to reproduce at some later time the same conditions that obtained at an earlier time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The early universe contained a region of CTCs.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIn this paper we argue that we have no reason to neglect the zero-point-energy so that it is the tiny oscillating universe initial state that applies.
“In this paper we argue that we have no reason to neglect the “zero-point-energy” so that it is the tiny oscillating universe initial state that applies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThis may not be a problem in physics if retarded potentials are the only ones allowed.
“This thus may not be a problem in physics if retarded potentials are the only ones allowed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe oscillating universe reaches maximum radius a1 and then tunnels to a classical de Sitter state at minimum radius a2 where a2 < a0.
“It reaches maximum radius a 1 , and then tunnels to a classical de Sitter state at minimum radius a 2 where a 2 < a 0 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn this model, the evolution can be seen as a particle representing the universe starting as a point a=0 at the bottom of the metastable potential well with E=0, tunneling through the barrier, emerging at a=a0 with E=0, and becoming a classically inflating de Sitter solution.
“Thus, the evolution can be seen as a particle, representing the universe, starting as a point, a = 0, at the bottom of the metastable potential well, with E = 0. Then it tunnels through the barrier and emerges at a = a 0 with E = 0, whereupon it becomes a classically inflating de Sitter solution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [98]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningA similar conversion might in principle be possible with these cosmological models.
“A similar thing might in principle be possible with these cosmological models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBeing bubble universes, they will all be open with negative curvature as in Gott's model, but they will be asymptotically open de Sitter models at late times with a(t) = r0 sinh(t/r0) and Λ = Λ2.
“Being bubble universes, they will all be open with negative curvature as in Gott's model [89] but they will be asymptotically open de Sitter models at late times with a(t) = r 0 sinh(t/r 0 ) and Λ = Λ 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGott's two-string spacetime is simply connected, identical to Grant space at large distances from the strings, and contains CTCs.
“Gott's two-string spacetime is simply connected, but is identical to Grant space at large distances from the strings.It also contains CTCs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe two strings in Gott's spacetime provide positive energy density and do not violate the weak energy condition.
“The two strings provide positive energy density (i.e. they do not violate the weak energy condition).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIf the roll down is slow, within the Λ2 bubble as it forms, it will have at least 67 e-folds of inflation with Λ ≃ Λ1 before it falls off the plateau into the absolute minimum at Λ2, and this will be an acceptable Big Bang model with the usual Big Bang properties except that it will eventually be dominated by a lambda term Λ2.
“If the roll down is slow, within the Λ 2 bubble as it forms, as in Gott's open bubble universe [89], then it will have at least 67 e-folds of inflation with Λ ≃ Λ 1 before it falls off the plateau into the absolute minimum at Λ 2 , and this will be an acceptable Big Bang model which will have the usual Big Bang properties except that it will eventually be dominated by a lambda term Λ 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause pure retarded potentials are established automatically in this model, there are no waves propagating to the past, so there may be no problem in physics with the model's past geodesic incompleteness.
“This is not a property we should have thought desirable, but since pure retarded potentials are established automatically in this model, there are no waves propagating to the past and so there may be no problem in physics with this, since there are never any waves that run off the edge of the spacetime.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIf our multiply connected model was geodesically complete to the past, so would the covering space (a simply connected Garriga-Vilenkin model) be; if it was geodesically incomplete to the past, so would the covering space be also.
“If our multiply connected model was geodesically complete to the past, so would the covering space (a simply connected Garriga-Vilenkin model) be.If our multiply connected model was geodesically incomplete to the past, so would the covering space (a simply connected Garriga-Vilenkin model) be also.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningNow we identify the two hypersurfaces denoted by A1AA2 to obtain a model of the Universe creating itself.
“Now we identify the two hypersurfaces denoted by A1AA2 to obtain a model of the Universe creating itself.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenWe identify M1N1 with M2N2, to obtain a model of the Universe creating itself.
“We identify M1N1 with M2N2, to obtain a model of the Universe creating itself.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIf Λ1 = Λ2, this reduces to our multiply connected de Sitter model F + R shown in Fig. 4b.
“If Λ1 = Λ2, this reduces to our multiply connected de Sitter model F + R shown in Fig. 4b.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
The early universe contains a region of CTCs.
“But, suppose the early universe contains a region of CTCs.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The probability of a particular multiple connection forming is not exactly zero.
“as long as the probability of a particular multiple connection forming is not exactly zero”
The paper relies on this without support.
An infinite number of baby universes are created.
“Since an infinite number of baby universes are created”
The authors state this as an assumption.
For the rest of the paper, the authors assume single-bubble open inflationary models for our Big Bang universe.
“For the rest of this paper we shall usually assume single-bubble open inflationary models for our Big Bang universe”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The authors assume an initial metastable vacuum which decays by forming bubbles through barrier penetration.
“In any case, we will be assuming an initial metastable vacuum which decays by forming bubbles through barrier penetration.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The bubble formation rate per unit four volume r0^4 is ε≪1.
“given that the bubble formation rate per four volume r 4 0 is ǫ ≪ 1”
The paper relies on this without support.
In ordinary statistical thermodynamics, entropy is always positive.
“And, from ordinary statistical thermodynamics we know that entropy is always positive, so the physical meaning of a negative entropy is unclear.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The uncertainty principle requires ∆p_i ∆q_i ≥ 2πh.
“The uncertainty principle demands that ∆p i ∆q i ≥ 2πh and thus we should always have N ≥ 1.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ordinary continuous thermodynamics holds only for the case with N ≫ 1.
“On the other hand, ordinary continuous thermodynamics holds only for the case with N ≫ 1.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The number of states N is always an integer.
“When N is small, quantization of the entropy becomes important (remember that the number of states N is always an integer).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The tunneling probability ε is exponentially small.
“This should be no problem because we expect that this tunneling probability ǫ should be exponentially small.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
One of these open bubble universes turns out to be the original open universe where the advanced civilization made the baby de Sitter universe.
“Now suppose one of these open bubble universes simply turns out to be the original open universe where that advanced civilization made the baby de Sitter universe in the first place (Fig. 7).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
During the tunneling event, the trajectory may be approximated as a classical space with four spacelike dimensions solving Einstein's equations, with the potential inverted.
“During the tunneling event, the trajectory may be approximated as a classical space with four spacelike dimensions solving Einstein's equations, with the potential inverted, so that this Euclidean section bridges the gap between the two classical turning points.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The probability for a civilization to form on a habitable planet like Earth and eventually succeed at creating a universe in the lab is some finite number greater than zero.
“In fact, if the probability for a civilization to form on a habitable planet like the Earth and eventually succeed at creating a universe in the lab is some finite number greater than zero (even if it is very low), then our universe (if it is an open bubble universe) should spawn an infinite number of such baby universes.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Our universe is open.
“However, if our universe is open, it has an infinite number of galaxies”
The paper relies on this without support.
If our universe is open, it has an infinite number of galaxies.
“However, if our universe is open, it has an infinite number of galaxies”
The authors state this as an assumption.
One of the created baby universes is the original universe that one started with.
“In our scenario, suppose that”
“if one of those created baby universes turns out to be the original universe that one started with.”
“Now take this recycling model where it turns out that one of the Λ 1 bubbles formed inside an Λ 2 bubble inside a Λ 1 region is, in fact, the Λ 1 region that one started out with.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The early universe contained a region of CTCs.
“If instead there were a region of CTCs in the early universe, then asking what was the earliest point in the Universe would be like asking what is the easternmost point on the Earth.”
“Such an early region of CTCs could well be over by now, being bounded to the future by a Cauchy horizon.”
The paper relies on this without support.
One of the baby universes produced by inflation turns out to be the universe we started with.
“If one of these baby universes simply turns out to be the universe we started with, then a multiply connected model with early CTCs bounded by a Cauchy horizon is produced.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A super-civilization can create an expanding bubble of de Sitter metastable vacuum.
“After recombination a super-civilization creates, at the right, an expanding bubble of de Sitter metastable vacuum.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The dense absorber can make the Cauchy horizon stable against vacuum polarization effects.
“where the dense absorber can make the Cauchy horizon stable against vacuum polarization effects.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The quantum behavior of the universe can be modeled by a minisuperspace Wheeler-DeWitt equation with potential U(a).
“The potential function in the Wheeler-DeWitt equation in the minisuperspace model.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Early-region volume is stated as a fraction of itself
MinorThe paper gives the early-region volume as approximately 0.011 times itself. Its preceding formula defines a positive volume for τ0 > 0, so the comparison must refer to a different volume.
“For b = 2π we have τ 0 ≃ 0.086r 0 , V II ≃ 0.011V II , and thus P II ≃ 0.011P I .”
“The 0 < τ < τ 0 part of the fundamental cell in F has a finite four-volume V II = V I (cosh 3 τ0 r0 -1).”
Cites
Particle creation by black holes
Hawking, S. W. (1975) · Communications In Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02345020 · Cited by 13,106 · see citing works
The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time
Hawking, S. W., & Ellis, G. F. R. (1973) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511524646 · Cited by 10,624 · see citing works
Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems
Guth, A. H. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.347 · Cited by 9,983 · see citing works
Quantum Fields in Curved Space
Birrell, N. D., & Davies, P. C. W. (1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622632 · Cited by 8,354 · see citing works
Wald, R. M. (1984) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001 · Cited by 7,188 · see citing works
Linde, A. D. (1982) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)91219-9 · Cited by 6,405 · see citing works
Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking
Albrecht, A., & Steinhardt, P. J. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.48.1220 · Cited by 4,981 · see citing works
Notes on black-hole evaporation
Unruh, W. G. (1976) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.14.870 · Cited by 4,850 · see citing works
Linde, A. D. (1983) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7 · Cited by 3,299 · see citing works
Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation
Gibbons, G. W., & Hawking, S. W. (1977) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.2738 · Cited by 3,192 · see citing works
Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity
Weinberg, S., & Dicke, R. H. (1973) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1987308 · Cited by 3,103 · see citing works
Hartle, J. B., & Hawking, S. W. (1983) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.28.2960 · Cited by 3,027 · see citing works
General Relativity – An Einstein Centenary Survey
Irvine, J. M. (1980) · Physics Bulletin · doi:10.1088/0031-9112/31/4/029 · Cited by 2,871 · see citing works
Starobinsky, A. A. (1982) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90541-x · Cited by 2,662 · see citing works
A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s.
Penzias, A. A., & Wilson, R. W. (1965) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/148307 · Cited by 2,606 · see citing works
Structure in the COBE differential microwave radiometer first-year maps
Smoot, G. F., Bennett, C. L., Kogut, A., WRIGHT, E. L., Aymon, J., Boggess, N. W., Cheng, E. S., Amici, G. D., Gulkis, S. L., Hauser, M. G., et al. (1992) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/186504 · Cited by 2,595 · see citing works
A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae
Hubble, E. (1929) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.15.3.168 · Cited by 2,553 · see citing works
Fate of the false vacuum: Semiclassical theory
Coleman, S. (1977) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.2929 · Cited by 2,552 · see citing works
Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe
Guth, A. H., & Pi, S.-Y. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.1110 · Cited by 2,392 · see citing works
Zur Quantentheorie des Atomkernes
Gamow, G. (1928) · The European Physical Journal A · doi:10.1007/bf01343196 · Cited by 2,336 · see citing works
The singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology
Hawking, S. W., & Penrose, R. (1970) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1970.0021 · Cited by 2,100 · see citing works
Spontaneous creation of almost scale-free density perturbations in an inflationary universe
Bardeen, J. M., Steinhardt, P. J., & Turner, M. S. (1983) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.28.679 · Cited by 2,073 · see citing works
The development of irregularities in a single bubble inflationary universe
Hawking, S. W. (1982) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90373-2 · Cited by 1,991 · see citing works
Wormholes, Time Machines, and the Weak Energy Condition
Morris, M. S., Thorne, K. S., & Yurtsever, U. (1988) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.1446 · Cited by 1,832 · see citing works
The Particle Problem in the General Theory of Relativity
Einstein, A., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.48.73 · Cited by 1,701 · see citing works
Dynamical Theory of Groups and Fields
DeWitt, B. S., & Mullin, A. A. (1966) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1953053 · Cited by 1,634 · see citing works
(1994) · Cited by 1,630 · see citing works
An Example of a New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravitation
Gödel, K. (1949) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.21.447 · Cited by 1,625 · see citing works
Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay
Coleman, S., & De Luccia, F. (1980) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.21.3305 · Cited by 1,537 · see citing works
Relativity, Thermodynamics and Cosmology
Dingle, H. (1935) · Nature · doi:10.1038/135935a0 · Cited by 1,508 · see citing works
Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology
Linder, C. (1990) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b16971 · Cited by 1,477 · see citing works
Friedman, A. (1922) · The European Physical Journal A · doi:10.1007/bf01332580 · Cited by 1,468 · see citing works
Lorentzian Wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-5168 · Cited by 1,319 · see citing works
Interaction with the Absorber as the Mechanism of Radiation
WHEELER, J. A., & Feynman, R. P. (1945) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.17.157 · Cited by 1,272 · see citing works
Quantum field theory in de Sitter space: renormalization by point-splitting
Bunch, T. S., & Davies, P. C. W. (1978) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1978.0060 · Cited by 1,252 · see citing works
Primeval Adiabatic Perturbation in an Expanding Universe
Peebles, P. J. E., & Yu, J. T. (1970) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/150713 · Cited by 1,230 · see citing works
Empty Space-Times Admitting a Three Parameter Group of Motions
Taub, A. H. (1951) · Annals of Mathematics · doi:10.2307/1969567 · Cited by 1,164 · see citing works
Path-integral derivation of black-hole radiance
Hartle, J. B., & Hawking, S. W. (1976) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.13.2188 · Cited by 1,108 · see citing works
Birth of inflationary universes
Vilenkin, A. (1983) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.27.2848 · Cited by 998 · see citing works
Empty-Space Generalization of the Schwarzschild Metric
Newman, E. T., Tamburino, L. A., & Unti, T. W. J. (1963) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1704018 · Cited by 857 · see citing works
Creation of universes from nothing
Vilenkin, A. (1982) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90866-8 · Cited by 841 · see citing works
de Lapparent, V., Geller, M. J., & Huchra, J. P. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/184625 · Cited by 841 · see citing works
Chronology protection conjecture
Hawking, S. W. (1992) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.46.603 · Cited by 819 · see citing works
Eternally existing self-reproducing chaotic inflanationary universe
Linde, A. D. (1986) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)90611-8 · Cited by 817 · see citing works
Measurement of the cosmic microwave background spectrum by the COBE FIRAS instrument
Mather, J. C., Cheng, E. S., Cottingham, D. A., E., J. E. R., Fixsen, D. J., Hewagama, T., Isaacman, R., Jensen, K. A., Meyer, S. S., Noerdlinger, P. D., et al. (1994) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/173574 · Cited by 813 · see citing works
Geller, M. J., & Huchra, J. P. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.246.4932.897 · Cited by 804 · see citing works
Some Spatially Homogeneous Anisotropic Relativistic Cosmological Models
Kantowski, R., & Sachs, R. K. (1966) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1704952 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Friedman, A. (1999) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1023/a:1026751225741 · Cited by 741 · see citing works
The observational case for a low-density Universe with a non-zero cosmological constant
Ostriker, J. P., & Steinhardt, P. J. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377600a0 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
A Hypothesis, Unifying the Structure and the Entropy of the Universe
Zeldovich, Y. B. (1972) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/160.1.1p · Cited by 708 · see citing works
The quantum state of the universe
Hawking, S. W. (1984) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90093-2 · Cited by 689 · see citing works
General Relativity for Mathematicians
Sachs, R. K., & Wu, H.-H. (1977) · Graduate Texts in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-9903-5 · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Bubble collisions in the very early universe
Hawking, S. W., Moss, I. G., & Stewart, J. M. (1982) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.26.2681 · Cited by 610 · see citing works
Mather, J. C., Cheng, E. S., E., J. E. R., Isaacman, R., Meyer, S. S., Shafer, R. A., Weiss, R., WRIGHT, E. L., Bennett, C. L., Boggess, N. W., et al. (1990) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/185717 · Cited by 583 · see citing works
Vilenkin, A. (1984) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.30.509 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Could the universe have recovered from a slow first-order phase transition?
Guth, A. H., & Weinberg, E. J. (1983) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90307-3 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
Fluctuations at the Threshold of Classical Cosmology
Harrison, E. R. (1970) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.1.2726 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Quantum field theory in Schwarzschild and Rindler spaces
Boulware, D. G. (1975) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.11.1404 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Quantum cosmology and the initial state of the Universe
Vilenkin, A. (1988) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.888 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Vacuum polarization in Schwarzschild spacetime
Candelas, P. (1980) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.21.2185 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
Is the Universe a Vacuum Fluctuation?
Tryon, E. P. (1973) · Nature · doi:10.1038/246396a0 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
Hawking, S. W., Penrose, R., & Cutler, C. (1996) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0796-60 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Quantum Mechanics and Radioactive Disintegration
Gurney, R. W., & Condon, E. U. (1929) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.33.127 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Galaxy correlations on large scales
Maddox, S., Efstathiou, G., Sutherland, W. J., & Loveday, J. (1990) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/242.1.43p · Cited by 419 · see citing works
The spatial correlation function of rich clusters of galaxies
Bahcall, N. A., & Soneira, R. M. (1983) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/161094 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Closed timelike curves produced by pairs of moving cosmic strings: Exact solutions
Gott, J. R. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.66.1126 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Self-citationIX.—The Gravitational Field of a Distribution of Particles Rotating about an Axis of Symmetry
van Stockum, W. J. (1938) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh · doi:10.1017/s0370164600013699 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
The occurrence of singularities in cosmology. ɪɪɪ. Causality and singularities
Hawking, S. W. (1967) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1967.0164 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Creation of open universes from de Sitter space
Gott, J. R. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/295304a0 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Self-citationTopology in General Relativity
Geroch, R. (1967) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1705276 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes
Paulus, K. (1988) · Physics Bulletin · doi:10.1088/0031-9112/39/8/020 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Using Type IA supernova light curve shapes to measure the Hubble constant
Riess, A. G., Press, W. H., & Kirshner, R. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/187704 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
The sponge-like topology of large-scale structure in the universe
R., I. G. J., Dickinson, M., & Melott, A. L. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164347 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
THE GLOBAL STRUCTURE OF THE INFLATIONARY UNIVERSE
GONCHAROV, A. S., LINDE, A. D., & MUKHANOV, V. F. (1987) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x87000211 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Trace anomaly of a conformally invariant quantum field in curved spacetime
Wald, R. M. (1978) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.17.1477 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Black holes as possible sources of closed and semiclosed worlds
Frolov, V. P., Markov, M. A., & Mukhanov, V. F. (1990) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.41.383 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Bucher, M., Goldhaber, A. S., & Turok, N. (1995) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.3314 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Kundić, T., Turner, E. L., Colley, W. N., Gott III, J. R., Rhoads, J. E., Wang, Y., Bergeron, L. E., Gloria, K. A., Long, D. C., Malhotra, S., et al. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304147 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum field theory, horizons and thermodynamics
Sciama, D. W., Candelas, P., & Deutsch, D. (1981) · Advances In Physics · doi:10.1080/00018738100101457 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Is it possible to create a universe in the laboratory by quantum tunneling?
Farhi, E., Guth, A. H., & Guven, J. (1990) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90357-j · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Thermal stress tensors in static Einstein spaces
Page, D. N. (1982) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.25.1499 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Alpher, R. A., & Herman, R. (1948) · Nature · doi:10.1038/162774b0 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Implications of the Copernican principle for our future prospects
Gott, J. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/363315a0 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Self-citationGamow, G. (1948) · Nature · doi:10.1038/162680a0 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Cauchy problem in spacetimes with closed timelike curves
Friedman, J. L., Morris, M. S., Novikov, I. D., Echeverria, F., Klinkhammer, G., Thorne, K. S., & Yurtsever, U. (1990) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.42.1915 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Critical Dialogues in Cosmology
Turok, N. (1997) · doi:10.1142/9789814530521 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Integration contours for the no-boundary wave function of the universe
Halliwell, J. J., & Hartle, J. B. (1990) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.41.1815 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
INTRODUCTORY LECTURES ON QUANTUM COSMOLOGY
Halliwell, J. J. (1991) · doi:10.1142/9789814503501_0003 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Time's Arrows and Quantum Measurement
Schulman, L. S. (1997) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622878 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
The Origin of Elements and the Separation of Galaxies
Gamow, G. (1948) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.74.505.2 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Black hole in thermal equilibrium with a scalar field: The back-reaction
York, J. W. (1985) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.31.775 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Do vacuum fluctuations prevent the creation of closed timelike curves?
Kim, S., & Thorne, K. S. (1991) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.3929 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
The density field of the local Universe
Saunders, W., Frenk, C. S., Rowan-robinson, M., Efstathiou, G., Lawrence, A., Kaiser, N., Ellis, R. S., Crawford, J. W., Xia, X., & Parry, I. R. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/349032a0 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Conflict over the age of the Universe
Bolte, M., & Hogan, C. J. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/376399a0 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Smolin, L. (1992) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/9/1/016 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Gravitational lensing limits on the cosmological constant in a flat universe
Turner, E. L. (1990) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/185884 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Difficulties with Inflationary Cosmology <sup>a</sup>
PENROSE, R. (1989) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1989.tb50513.x · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Calabi, E., & Markus, L. (1962) · Annals of Mathematics · doi:10.2307/1970419 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Garriga, J., & Vilenkin, A. (1998) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.57.2230 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Linde, A. D. (1995) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)00370-z · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Linde, A. D., & Mezhlumian, A. (1995) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.6789 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Yamamoto, K., Sasaki, M., & Tanaka, T. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/176588 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Ratra, B., & Peebles, P. J. E. (1995) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.1837 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Quantum Cosmology and Baby Universes
(1991) · doi:10.1142/1190 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Gold, T. (1962) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1942052 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Signature change in general relativity
Hayward, S. A. (1992) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/9/8/007 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Quantum Field Theory on Spacetimes with a Compactly Generated Cauchy Horizon
Kay, B. S., Radzikowski, M. J., & Wald, R. M. (1997) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s002200050042 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Zur Quantentheorie der Atomzertr�mmerung
Gamow, G. (1929) · The European Physical Journal A · doi:10.1007/bf01339451 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
The Physical Basis of The Direction of Time
Zeh, H. D. (1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02759-2 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Partridge, C. H. (2020) · Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions · doi:10.1525/nr.2020.23.3.31 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
How many new worlds are inside a black hole?
Barrabès, C., & Frolov, V. P. (1996) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.53.3215 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
World Structure and the Expansion of the Universe
Milne, E. A. (1932) · Nature · doi:10.1038/130009a0 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Field theories on conformally related space-times: Some global considerations
Candelas, P., & Dowker, J. S. (1979) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.19.2902 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Topological analysis of the CfA redshift survey
Vogeley, M. S., Park, C., Geller, M. J., Huchra, J. P., & Richard, I. G. J. (1994) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/173583 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Cold dark matter cosmogony in an open universe
Ratra, B., & Peebles, P. J. E. (1994) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/187498 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
SINGULARITIES IN INFLATIONARY COSMOLOGY: A REVIEW
BORDE, A., & VILENKIN, A. (1996) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271896000497 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Schrodinger, E., & Basri, S. A. (1956) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1934284 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Cosmological considerations of the absorber theory of radiation
Hogarth, J. E. (1962) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1962.0105 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Time symmetric electrodynamics and the arrow of time in cosmology
HOYLE, F., & Narlikar, J. V. (1964) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1964.0002 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Cosmic strings and chronology protection
Grant, J. D. E. (1993) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.47.2388 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Constraints on the formation of bubble universes
Gott, J. R., & Statler, T. S. (1984) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)91171-7 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationNonsingular general-relativistic cosmologies
Bekenstein, J. D. (1975) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.11.2072 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Quantum field theory on spacetimes with a compactly generated Cauchy horizonPreprint
Kay, B. S., Radzikowski, M. J., & Wald, R. M. (1997) · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Thermal properties of Green's functions in Rindler, de Sitter, and Schwarzschild spaces
Dowker, J. S. (1978) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.18.1856 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
The topology of large-scale structure. I - Topology and the random phase hypothesis
Weinberg, D. H., Richard, I. G. J., & Melott, A. L. (1987) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/165612 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Quantum field theory in spaces with closed timelike curves
Boulware, D. G. (1992) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.46.4421 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Open inflation with an arbitrary false vacuum mass
Bucher, M., & Turok, N. (1995) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.5538 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Quantum vacuum energy in Taub-NUT (Newman-Unti-Tamburino)-type cosmologies
Hiscock, W. A., & Konkowski, D. A. (1982) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.26.1225 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Large N-body simulations of a universe dominated by cold dark matter
Park, C. (1990) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/242.1.59p · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Quantum coherence and closed timelike curves
Hawking, S. W. (1995) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.5681 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Smolin, L., & March, R. H. (1998) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.882193 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
The topology of large-scale structure. VI - Slices of the universe
Park, C., R., I. G. J., Melott, A. L., & Karachentsev, I. D. (1992) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/171055 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Strong gravitational lensing statistics as a test of cosmogonic scenarios
Cen, R., Richard, I. G. J., Ostriker, J. P., & Turner, E. L. (1994) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/173784 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Groups of Galaxies. 111. Mass-To Ratios and Crossing Times
Richard, I. G. J., & Turner, E. L. (1977) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/155157 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Vacuum polarization in a locally static multiply connected spacetime and a time-machine problem
Frolov, V. P. (1991) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.3878 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Hadamard function, stress tensor, and de Sitter space
Bernard, D., & Folacci, A. (1986) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.34.2286 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
The oscillating universe: an alternative to inflation
Durrer, R., & Laukenmann, J. (1996) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/5/021 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Quantum stability of the time machine
Krasnikov, S. (1996) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.54.7322 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Hawking, S. W. (1979) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-2955-8_4 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-Consistent Vacuum for Misner Space and the Chronology Protection Conjecture
Li, L., & Gott, J. R. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2980 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationLarge-scale structure in the Southern Sky Redshift Survey
Park, C., R., I. G. J., & da Costa, L. N. (1992) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/186423 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Models for chronology selection
Cassidy, M. J., & Hawking, S. W. (1998) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.57.2372 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Traversable wormholes: The Roman ring
Visser, M. (1997) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.5212 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Chronology protection and quantized fields: complex automorphic scalar field in Misner space
Sushkov, S. V. (1997) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/2/025 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Massive scalar field in multiply connected flat spacetimes
Tanaka, T., & Hiscock, W. A. (1995) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.4503 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Hawking, S. W., & Ellis, G. (1973) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511524646.004 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Vacuum polarization of scalar and spinor fields near closed null geodesics
Klinkhammer, G. (1992) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.46.3388 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Junction Conditions for Signature ChangePreprint
Hayward, S. A. (1993) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9303034 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
A Time-Symmetric Matter, Antimatter, Tachyon Cosmology
Richard, I. G. J. (1974) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/152581 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
(2+1)-dimensional spacetimes containing closed timelike curves
Headrick, M., & Gott, J. R. (1994) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.50.7244 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationStress - energy must be singular on the Misner space horizon even for automorphic fields
Cramer, C., & Kay, B. S. (1996) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/12/002 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Signature change in general relativity
Hayward, S. A. (1992) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/9/11/019 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Simulation of deep one- and two-dimensional redshift surveys
Park, C., & Gott, J. R. (1991) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/249.2.288 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationMust time machines be unstable against vacuum fluctuations?
Li, L. (1996) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/9/019 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationCramer, C., & Kay, B. S. (1998) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.57.1052 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Complex geometry, quantum tunneling, and time machines
Li, L., Xu, J.-M., & Liu, L. (1993) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.48.4735 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationNew light on time machines: Against the chronology protection conjecture
Li, L. (1994) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.50.r6037 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationDivergences in the effective action for acausal spacetimes
Cassidy, M. J. (1997) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/11/006 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Quantum field theory in Lorentzian universes from nothing
Friedman, J. L., & Higuchi, A. (1995) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.5687 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
The three-point correlation function for Abell clusters - Observations and simulations
R., I. G. J., Gao, B., & Park, C. (1991) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/170766 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The Impossibility of Steady-State InflationPreprint
Borde, A., & Vilenkin, A. (1994) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9403004 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Isometries between Gott’s two-string spacetime and Grant’s generalization of Misner space
Laurence, D. (1994) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.50.4957 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Kennicut, R. C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381555b0 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Creation of multiple de Sitter universes inside a Schwarzschild black holePreprint
Barrabes, C., & Frolov, V. P. (1996) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9607040 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The Sixth Canadian Conference on General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics
Braham, S. P., Gegenberg, J., & McKellar, R. J. (1997) · American Mathematical Society eBooks · doi:10.1090/fic/015 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Time machines without closed causal geodesics
Low, R. J. (1995) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/12/5/001 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
CMB Anisotropy in COBE-DMR-Normalized Open CDM CosmogonyPreprint
Ratra, B., Banday, A. J., Gorski, K. M., & Sugiyama, N. (1995) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9512148 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
CMB Anisotropy in COBE-DMR-Normalized Flat $Λ$ CDM CosmogonyPreprint
Ratra, B., & Sugiyama, N. (1995) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9512157 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Visser, M. (1997) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(97)00392-6
Garriga, J., & Vilenkin, A. (1997) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9707292
Tolman, R. C. (1933) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.77.1995.291
Field theory on spacetimes that are not globally hyperbolic
Friedman, J. (1997) · The Sixth Canadian Conference on General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics · doi:10.1090/fic/015/03
Models for Chronology Selection
Cassidy, M. J., & Hawking, S. W. (1997) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9709066
CMB Anisotropy Correlation Function and Topology from Simulated Maps for MAP
Park, C., Colley, W. N., Gott, J. R., Ratra, B., Spergel, D. N., & Sugiyama, N. (1997) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9711057
Self-citationVisser, M. (1997) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9710020
Cramer, C. R., & Kay, B. S. (1997) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9708028
A Self-Consistent Vacuum for Misner Space and the Chronology Protection Conjecture
Li, L.-X., & Gott, J. R. (1997) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9711074
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- C. W. Misner, 1967, Relativity Theory and Astrophysics I: Relativity and Cosmology
- K. S. Thorne, 1993, General Relativity and Gravitation 1992: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation
- S. W. Hawking, 1992, Proceedings of the 6-th Marcel Grossmann Meeting
- L.-X. Li, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 48, 4735
- E. R. Harrison, 1995, Q. J. R. Astron. Soc., 36, 193
- G. Lemaitre, 1933, Ann. Soc. Sci. Bruxelles A., 53, 51
- C. Barrabès, 1996, Helv. Phys. Acta, 69, 253
- B. Carter, 1974, Confrontation of Cosmological Theories with Observations
- E. W. Kolb, 1990, The Early Universe
- S. A. Shectman, 1995, Wide Field Spectroscopy and the Distant Universe, the 35th Herstmonceux Conference
- J. R. Gott, 1975, Astron. Astrophys., 45, 365
- J. Mould, 1996, Nature (London), 381, 555
- A. Sandage, 1996, Nature (London), 381, 555
- M. Fukugita, 1990, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 246, 24P
- A. A. Starobinsky, 1986, Field Theory, Quantum Gravity, and Strings, Lectures in Physics, edited M. J. de Vega and N. Sánchez
- I. D. Novikov, 1983, Evolution of the Universe
- C. W. Misner, 1969, Sov. Phys. JETP, 28, 122
- C. W. Misner, 1973, Gravitation
- T. Rothman, 1993, Q. J. R. Astron. Soc., 34, 201
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exotic solutions in General Relativity: Traversable wormholes and 'warp drive' spacetimesPreprint
Lobo, F. S. N. (2007) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0710.4474 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Minimal conditions for the creation of a Friedman–Robertson–Walker universe from a “bounce”
Molina-Parı́s, C., & Visser, M. (1999) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00469-4 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
ISSUES IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF COSMOLOGY
Ellis, G. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-044451560-5/50014-2 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
González-Dı́az, P. F. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.071301 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Vidal, C. (2014) · The frontiers collection · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05062-1 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Wormholes and ringholes in a dark-energy universe
González-Dı́az, P. F. (2003) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.084016 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Quantum cosmology and open universes
Coule, D. H., & Martin, J. (2000) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.063501 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Quantum cosmology and late-time singularities
Kamenshchik, A. Y. (2013) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/17/173001 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
83 years of general relativity and cosmology: progress and problems
Ellis, G. (1999) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/16/12a/303 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Last, C. (2015) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-015-9434-y · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Kirilyuk, A. P. (1998) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.physics/9806002 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Meyer, U. (2012) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/ans045 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Yurov, A. V., Martín–Moruno, P., & González-Dı́az, P. F. (2006) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.10.021 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Time travel paradoxes, path integrals, and the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics
Everett, A. E. (2004) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.124023 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Topological censorship and chronology protection
Friedman, J., & Higuchi, A. (2005) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.200510172 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
From configuration to dynamics: Emergence of Lorentz signature in classical field theory
Shinji Mukohyama, A., & Uzan, J. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.065020 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Exact string theory model of closed timelike curves and cosmological singularities
Johnson, C. V., & Svendsen, H. (2004) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.126011 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
González-Dı́az, P. F. (2000) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.044005 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
The Emergent Nature of Time and the Complex Numbers in Quantum Cosmology
Gibbons, G. W. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23259-6_6 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Parity violating Friedmann universes
Magueijo, J., & Zlosnik, T. G. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.084036 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Li, L., & Gott, J. R. (1998) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.58.103513 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationMeasuring Spacetime: From the Big Bang to Black Holes
Tegmark, M. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1072184 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
The Teleological and Kalam Cosmological Arguments Revisited
Loke, A. T. E. (2022) · Palgrave frontiers in philosophy of religion · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-94403-2 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Collisions of particles in locally AdS spacetimes I. Local description and global examplesPreprint
Barbot, T., Bonsante, F., & Schlenker, J. (2016) · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Effingham, N. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842507.001.0001 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Two open universes connected by a wormhole: exact solutions
Li, L. (2001) · Journal of Geometry and Physics · doi:10.1016/s0393-0440(01)00028-6 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum entanglement in the multiverse
Robles-Pérez, S., & González-Dı́az, P. F. (2014) · Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1134/s1063776113140173 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Collisions of Particles in Locally AdS Spacetimes I. Local Description and Global Examples
Barbot, T., Bonsante, F., & Schlenker, J. (2011) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-011-1318-6 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
A Universe that Does Not Know the Time
Magueijo, J., & Smolin, L. (2019) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe5030084 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Time machines constructed from anti–de Sitter space
Li, L. (1999) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.084016 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationTopological censorship and chronology protection.
Friedman, J. L. (1997) · Gravitation and Cosmology · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5812-1_26 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Vaas, R. (2004) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.physics/0408111 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Effingham, N. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842507.003.0005 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Topological censorship and chronology protection
Friedman, J. L., & Higuchi, A. (2005) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.200651801-209 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Answering a Basic Objection to Bang/Crunch HolographyPreprint
McInnes, B. (2004) · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Vacuum decay in an interacting multiverse
Robles-Pérez, S., Alonso-Serrano, A., Bastos, C., & Orfeu Bertolami, A. (2016) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.05.091 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Gardner, J. N. (2000) · Complexity · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0526(200001/02)5:3 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Cosmology in the Lorentz gauge theory
Koivisto, T. (2023) · International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics · doi:10.1142/s0219887824500403 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Answering a Basic Objection to Bang/Crunch Holography
McInnes, B. (2004) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/10/018 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Creation of Entangled Universes Avoids the Big Bang Singularity
Robles-Pérez, S. (2014) · Journal of Gravity · doi:10.1155/2014/382675 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Gravity waves in parity-violating Copernican universes
Alexander, S., Jenks, L. G., Jiroušek, P., Magueijo, J., & Zlosnik, T. G. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.044039 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Quantum cosmology of a conformal multiverse
Robles-Pérez, S. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.063511 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Conceptual Challenges on the Road to the Multiverse
Alonso-Serrano, A., & Jannes, G. (2019) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe5100212 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Quantum Cosmology with Third Quantisation
Robles-Pérez, S. (2021) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe7110404 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Emergent Lorentz signature, fermions, and the standard model
Kehayias, J., Shinji Mukohyama, A., & Uzan, J. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.105017 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Nonorientable spacetime tunneling
González-Dı́az, P. F., & Garay, L. J. (1999) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.064026 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
VARYING <i>c</i> COSMOLOGY AND PLANCK VALUE CONSTRAINTS
COULE, D. H. (1999) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732399002534 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Before the Beginning: Emerging Questions and Uncertainties
Ellis, G. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4114-7_83 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
The Universe as a Cyclic Organized Information System: John Wheeler’s World Revisited
Meijer, D. K. F. (2014) · NeuroQuantology · doi:10.14704/nq.2015.13.1.798 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The Copernican principle in compact space-times
Barrow, J. D., & Levin, J. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07117.x · Cited by 10 · see citing works
On Non-Singular Space-times and the Beginning of the Universe
Craig, W. L., & Sinclair, J. D. (2012) · Palgrave Macmillan eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137026019_6 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Time After Time — Big Bang Cosmology and the Arrows of Time
Vaas, R. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23259-6_2 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Moghri, M. (2020) · Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1515/krt-2020-340305 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Quantum creation and inflationary universes: A critical appraisal
Coule, D. H. (2000) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.124010 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
González-Dı́az, P. F. (1999) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.024019 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
2 On the Regularizability of the Big Bang SingularityPreprint
Belbruno, E. A. (2012) · Cited by 9 · see citing works
New remarks on the cosmological argument
Romero, G. E., & Pérez, D. (2012) · International Journal for Philosophy of Religion · doi:10.1007/s11153-012-9337-6 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Concepts of Time in Physics: A Synopsis
Jammer, M. (2007) · Physics in Perspective · doi:10.1007/s00016-007-0349-z · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Perdurance of multiply connected de Sitter space
González-Dı́az, P. F. (1999) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.123513 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Time-machines construct in f(ℛ, 𝒜, Aμν Aμν ) and f(ℛ) modified gravity theories
Ahmed, F., de Souza, J. C. R., & Santos, A. F. (2024) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/015 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Gardner, J. N. (2005) · Complexity · doi:10.1002/cplx.20086 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Quantum simulation of gravitational-like waves in minisuperspace with an artificial qubit
Zhang, Z.-L., Chen, M., Wu, H., & Yang, Z. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.046010 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Theoretical and empirical explorations of "Generalized Quantum Theory"
von Stillfried, N. (2010) · Natallia Sender (Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Entropic Issues in Contemporary Cosmology
COULE, D. H. (2003) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271803003530 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Correlations across horizons in quantum cosmology
Alonso-Serrano, A., Garay, L. J., & Marugán, G. A. M. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.124074 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
EMERGENCE OF THE LORENTZIAN STRUCTURE IN CLASSICAL FIELD THEORY
Mukoyama, S., & Uzan, J. (2013) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271813420182 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Life on a closed timelike curve
Gavassino, L. (2024) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad98df · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The boundary of the chronology violating set
Minguzzi, E. (2016) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/22/225004 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Alonso, J. L., & Carmona, J. M. (2019) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab3780 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The unique nature of cosmology
Ellis, G. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0111-3_9 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Augustine of Hippo’s Philosophy of Time Meets General Relativity
Minguzzi, E. (2014) · KronoScope · doi:10.1163/15685241-12341292 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Rennick, S. (2021) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies6030078 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
On the regularizability of the big bang singularity
Belbruno, E. A. (2012) · Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s10569-012-9449-4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Gott, J. R., & -, I. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/9/018 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationEntropic issues in contemporary cosmologyPreprint
Coule, D. H. (2003) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
On God and the Beginning of the Universe: An Evaluation of Recent Discussions
Loke, A. T. E. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14030290 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Robles-Pérez, S. (2012) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/52012 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Algebraic Self-Dualityc as the ”Ultimate Explanation”
Heller, M. C. (2004) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-005-4825-0 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Bubble Collision in Curved Spacetime
Hwang, D.-I., Lee, B.-H., Lee, W., & Yeom, D.-H. (2014) · Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2013.10.086 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Scalar and tensor perturbations in vacuum inflation
Huang, Z., Gao, D.-F., & Cai, Q.-Y. (2017) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa6b9c · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Can Cosmology Justify Belief in an Eternal Universe?
Erasmus, J. (2018) · Sophia studies in cross-cultural philosophy of traditions and cultures · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73438-5_9 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sivers, V., & Buhaiova, O. (2023) · Almanac Culture and Contemporaneity · doi:10.32461/2226-0285.1.2023.286774 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Quantum CTC's in General Relativity
Garay, L. J., & González-Dı́az, P. F. (2001) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1023/a:1002709503156 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Emergent Structures of Effective Field Theories
Uzan, J. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316535783.007 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Quantum Closed Timelike Curves in General Relativity
González‐Díaz, P. F., & Garay, L. J. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-88-470-2101-3_41 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Tit for tat for tit: On reactive loops and regresses
Kearns, S. (2022) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/anac032 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Does Operator Ordering Need Wormhole Dominance in the Wavefunction of the Universe?
Biswas, S., Chowdhury, I., & Misra, P. (2003) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1023/a:1022949714959 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
González-Dı́az, P. F., & CARRIÓN, J. M. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271804004438 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Can God find a place in physics? St. Augustine's philosophy meets general relativityPreprint
Minguzzi, E. (2009) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Yates, J. (n.d.) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Nardelli, M. (2009) · CNR SOLAR (Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository) (University of Southampton)
The CWKB Method of Particle Production Near the Chronology Horizon
Biswas, S., Misra, P., & Chowdhury, I. (2002) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1023/a:1015994313112
A Wave Function for the Spin of the Early Universe Derived from the Wheeler-DeWitt Equation
Echaurren, J. C. (2017) · International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.4236/ijaa.2017.72006
What is the Nature of the First Cause?
Loke, A. T. E. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57547-6_6
Is There a Causal Loop Which Avoids a First Cause?
Loke, A. T. E. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57547-6_4
Effingham, N. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842507.003.0015
Effingham, N. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842507.003.0008
Effingham, N. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842507.003.0002
Effingham, N. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842507.003.0004
- Authors
- Gott, J. R., & Li, L.-X.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- ORCID
- Li, Li-Xin
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1998-05-29
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2064913826
- Semantic Scholar
- 7a83f1ae2237e201a3c9daead5e2310445fa1102
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 161
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- closed timelike curves, cosmic inflation, baby universes, metastable vacuum, de Sitter space, Cauchy horizon, arrow of time, vacuum polarization, black hole tunneling, bubble universes, renormalized energy-momentum tensor, retarded potentials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review