Cited by 68

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum effects near a point mass in (2 + 1)-dimensional gravity

Souradeep, Tarun, Sahni, Varun·1992·Physical Review D

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.46.1616

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • δg_tt > 0, indicating gravitational attraction.

    “Notably, δg tt > 0, indicating gravitational attraction [32,33].”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [32]

  • A conformally coupled scalar field in Schwarzschild-(A)dS3 produces a Casimir effect with negative energy density such that, upon solving the semi-classical Einstein equations, the linear order change to the tt-component of the metric in static patch coordinates goes like δg_tt = 2L_P F(M)/r.

    “For example, a conformally coupled scalar field in Schwarzschild-(A)dS 3 produces a Casimir effect with negative energy density such that, upon solving the semi-classical Einstein equations (1.1), the linear order change to the tt-component of the metric in static patch coordinates goes like [32,33] δg tt = 2L P F (M ) r , (1.3)”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [32]

  • Quantum backreaction effects alter the geometry such that the black hole horizon appears to hide the conical singularity.

    “Again, quantum backreaction effects alter the geometry such that the black hole horizon appears to hide the conical singularity [32].”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [32]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. D. Kramer, 1980, Exact Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations
  2. S. Deser, 1990, Fields, Strings and Gravity
  3. S. Deser, 1982, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 140, 372, 10.1016/0003-4916(82)90164-6 · DOI
  4. M. E. Ortiz, 1991, Nucl. Phys., B363, 185, 10.1016/0550-3213(91)90240-X · DOI
  5. N. J. Cornish, 1991, Phys. Rev. D, 43, 2555, 10.1103/PhysRevD.43.2555 · DOI · Paper page
  6. A. Vilenkin, 1985, Phys. Rep., 121, 263, 10.1016/0370-1573(85)90033-X · DOI
  7. G. 't Hooft, 1988, Commun. Math. Phys., 117, 685, 10.1007/BF01218392 · DOI
  8. S. Deser, 1988, Commun. Math. Phys., 118, 495, 10.1007/BF01466729 · DOI
  9. A. Cappelli, 1992, Nucl. Phys., B369, 669, 10.1016/0550-3213(92)90282-G · DOI
  10. T. M. Helliwell, 1986, Phys. Rev. D, 34, 1918, 10.1103/PhysRevD.34.1918 · DOI
  11. B. Linet, 1986, Phys. Rev. D, 33, 1833, 10.1103/PhysRevD.33.1833 · DOI
  12. B. Linet, 1987, Phys. Rev. D, 35, 536, 10.1103/PhysRevD.35.536 · DOI
  13. A. G. Smith, 1990, The Formation and Evolution of Cosmic Strings
  14. J. S. Dowker, 1977, J. Phys. A, 10, 115, 10.1088/0305-4470/10/1/023 · DOI
  15. J. S. Dowker, 1987, Class. Quantum Grav., 4, L157, 10.1088/0264-9381/4/5/001 · DOI
  16. J. S. Dowker, 1987, Phys Rev. D, 36, 3095, 10.1103/PhysRevD.36.3095 · DOI
  17. J. S. Dowker, 1990, The Formation and Evolution of Cosmic Strings
  18. P. C. W. Davies, 1987, Class. Quantum Grav., 5, 1, 10.1088/0264-9381/5/1/009 · DOI
  19. V. P. Frolov, 1986, Phys. Rev. D, 34, 2840, 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.2840 · DOI
  20. L. Parker, 1987, Phys. Rev. Lett., 59, 1369, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.1369 · DOI
  21. V. Sahni, 1988, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 3, 1425, 10.1142/S0217732388001719 · DOI
  22. W. A. Hiscock, 1987, Phys. Lett. B, 188, 317, 10.1016/0370-2693(87)91388-8 · DOI
  23. I. H. Russell, 1989, Class. Quantum Grav., 6, 1343, 10.1088/0264-9381/6/10/005 · DOI
  24. A. Sarmiento, 1988, Phys. Rev. D, 38, 1331, 10.1103/PhysRevD.38.1331 · DOI
  25. I. S. Gradshteyn, 1980, Tables of Integrals, Series and Products
  26. B. S. DeWitt, 1975, Phys. Rep., 19C, 295, 10.1016/0370-1573(75)90051-4 · DOI
  27. S. M. Christensen, 1976, Phys. Rev. D, 14, 2490, 10.1103/PhysRevD.14.2490 · DOI
  28. L. D. Landau, 1975, The Classical Theory of Fields
  29. J. D. Barrow, 1986, Class. Quantum Grav., 3, 551, 10.1088/0264-9381/3/4/010 · DOI · Paper page
  30. N. J. Cornish, 1991, Phys. Rev. D, 43, 2555, 10.1103/PhysRevD.43.2555 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 1970, Handbook of Mathematical Functions
  32. T. S. Bunch, 1978, Proc. R. Soc. London, A360, 117, 10.1098/rspa.1978.0060 · DOI
  33. B. Allen, 1987, Phys. Rev. D, 35, 3771, 10.1103/PhysRevD.35.3771 · DOI
  34. W. G. Unruh, 1976, Phys. Rev. D, 14, 870, 10.1103/PhysRevD.14.870 · DOI · Paper page
  35. B. S. DeWitt, 1979, General Relativity
  36. S. Takagi, 1986, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 88, 1, 10.1143/PTPS.88.1 · DOI
  37. C. J. Isham, 1978, Proc. R. Soc. London, A362, 383, 10.1098/rspa.1978.0140 · DOI
  38. C. J. Isham, 1978, Proc. R. Soc. London, A364, 591, 10.1098/rspa.1978.0219 · DOI
  39. L. H. Ford, 1980, Phys. Rev. D, 21, 949, 10.1103/PhysRevD.21.949 · DOI
  40. T. S. Bunch, 1978, J. Phys. A, 11, 1315, 10.1088/0305-4470/11/7/018 · DOI
  41. N. Sanchez, 1986, Nucl. Phys., B266, 487, 10.1016/0550-3213(86)90102-1 · DOI
  42. C. Teitleboim, 1984, Quantum Theory of Gravity
  43. R. Jackiw, Quantum Theory of Gravity
  44. N. J. Cornish, 1991, Phys. Rev. D, 43, 2555, 10.1103/PhysRevD.43.2555 · DOI · Paper page
  45. J. Gegenberg, 1988, Phys. Rev. D, 37, 3463, 10.1103/PhysRevD.37.3463 · DOI
  46. S. Deser, 1984, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 152, 220, 10.1016/0003-4916(84)90085-X · DOI · Paper page
  47. D. Deutch, 1979, Phys. Rev. D, 20, 3063, 10.1103/PhysRevD.20.3063 · DOI
  48. P. Candelas, 1975, Phys. Rev. D, 12, 965, 10.1103/PhysRevD.12.965 · DOI
  49. J. S. Dowker, 1976, Phys. Rev. D, 13, 3224, 10.1103/PhysRevD.13.3224 · DOI
  50. B. Ratra, 1985, Phys. Rev. D, 31, 1931, 10.1103/PhysRevD.31.1931 · DOI
  51. J. Garriga, 1992, Phys. Rev. D, 45, 3469, 10.1103/PhysRevD.45.3469 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Souradeep, T., & Sahni, V.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1992-08-15
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
1616-1633
ISSN
0556-2821
Cited by
68
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review