The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards the theory of the electroweak phase transition
Open accessAbstract
We investigate various problems related to the theory of the electroweak phase transition. This includes determination of the nature of the phase transition, discussion of the possible role of the higher-order radiative corrections, and the theory of the formation and evolution of bubbles of the new phase. We show, in particular, that no dangerous linear terms in the scalar field $\ensuremath{\varphi}$ appear in the expression for the effective potential. We have found that, for the Higgs-boson mass smaller than the masses of $W$ and $Z$ bosons, the phase transition is of the first order. However, its strength is approximately ⅔ times less than what follows from the one-loop approximation. The phase transition occurs due to production and expansion of critical bubbles. Subcritical bubbles may be important only if the phase transition is very weakly first order. A general analytic expression for the probability of the bubble formation is obtained, which may be used for study of tunneling in a wide class of theories. The bubble-wall velocity depends on many factors, including the ratio of the mean free path of the particles to the thickness of the wall. Thin walls in the electroweak theory have a nonrelativistic velocity, whereas thick walls may be relativistic. A decrease of the cubic term by the factor ⅔ rules out baryogenesis in the minimal version of the electroweak theory. Even though we concentrate in this paper on the phase transition in this theory, most of our results can be applied to more general models as well, where baryogenesis is possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems
Guth, A. H. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.347 · Cited by 9,983
Linde, A. D. (1982) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)91219-9 · Cited by 6,405
Self-citationCosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking
Albrecht, A., & Steinhardt, P. J. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.48.1220 · Cited by 4,981
On anomalous electroweak baryon-number non-conservation in the early universe
Kuzmin, V. A., Rubakov, V. A., & Shaposhnikov, M. E. (1985) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91028-7 · Cited by 3,008
Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology
Linde, A. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780367807788 · Cited by 647
Self-citation
Cited by
Trodden, M. (1999) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.71.1463 · Cited by 521
Growth of bubbles in cosmological phase transitions
Ignatius, J., Kajantie, K., Kurki-Suonio, H., & Laine, M. (1994) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.3854 · Cited by 225
Thermodynamics of the electroweak phase transition
Buchmüller, W., Fodor, Z., & Hebecker, A. (1995) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00254-p · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Dine, M., Leigh, R. G., Huet, P., Linde, A., & Linde, D.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1992-07-15
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 550-571
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993035796
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 39.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.