The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neutralino relic density in minimalN=1supergravity
Open accessAbstract
We compute the cosmic relic (dark-matter) density of the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) in the framework of minimal $N=1$ supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry. To this end, we recalculate the cross sections for all possible annihilation processes for a general, mixed neutralino state with arbitrary mass. Our analysis includes effects of all Yukawa couplings of third-generation fermions, and allows for a fairly general set of soft supersymmetry- (SUSY-) breaking parameters at the Planck scale. We find that a cosmologically interesting relic density emerges naturally over wide regions of parameter space. However, the requirement that relic neutralinos do not overclose the Universe does not lead to upper bounds on SUSY-breaking parameters that are strictly valid for all combinations of parameters and of interest for existing or planned collider experiments; in particular, gluino and squark masses in excess of 5 TeV cannot strictly be excluded. On the other hand, in the "generic" case of a gauginolike neutralino whose annihilation cross sections are not "accidentally" enhanced by a nearby Higgs boson or $Z$ pole, all sparticles should lie within the reach of the proposed $\mathrm{pp}$ and ${e}^{+}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ supercolliders. We also find that requiring the LSP to provide all dark matter predicted by inflationary models imposes a strict lower bound of 40 GeV on the common scalar mass $m$ at the Planck scale, while the lightest sleptons would have to be heavier than 100 GeV. Fortunately, a large relic neutralino density does not exclude the possibility that charginos, neutralinos, gluinos, and squarks are all within the reach of the CERN ${e}^{+}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ collider LEP 200 and the Fermilab Tevatron.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 · Cited by 4,979
Axions and the strongCPproblem
Kim, J. E., & Carosi, G. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.557 · Cited by 916
Study of constrained minimal supersymmetry
Kane, G. L., Kolda, C., Roszkowski, L., & Wells, J. D. (1994) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.6173 · Cited by 606
Supersymmetric dark matter in light of WMAP
Ellis, J., Olive, K. A., Santoso, Y., & Spanos, V. C. (2003) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(03)00765-2 · Cited by 398
Di Valentino, E., Said, J. L., Riess, A., Pollo, A., Poulin, V., Gómez-Valent, A., Weltman, A., Palmese, A., Huang, C. D., Bruck, C. V. D., et al. (2025) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Drees, M., & Nojiri, M. M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1993-01-15
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 376-408
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2597893009
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neutralino relic density in minimalN=1supergravity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.47.376
- The paper
- Drees, M., & Nojiri, M. M. (1993). Neutralino relic density in minimalN=1supergravity. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.47.376
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.