The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles: Envelope approximation to many-bubble collisions
Open accessAbstract
We introduce an approximation to calculate the gravitational radiation produced by the collision of true-vacuum bubbles that is simple enough to allow the simulation of a phase transition by the collision of hundreds of bubbles. This "envelope approximation" neglects the complicated "overlap" regions of colliding bubbles and follows only the evolution of the bubble walls. The approximation accurately reproduces previous results for the gravitational radiation from the collision of two scalar-field vacuum bubbles. Using a bubble nucleation rate given by $\ensuremath{\Gamma}={\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{0}{e}^{\ensuremath{\beta}t}$, we simulate a phase transition by colliding 20 to 200 bubbles; the fraction of vacuum energy released into gravity waves is $\frac{{E}_{\mathrm{GW}}}{{E}_{\mathrm{vac}}}=0.06{(\frac{H}{\ensuremath{\beta}})}^{2}$ and the peak of the spectrum occurs at ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{max}=1.6\ensuremath{\beta}$ (${H}^{2}=\frac{8\ensuremath{\pi}G\ensuremath{\rho}}{3}$ is the Hubble constant associated with the false-vacuum phase). The spectrum is very similar to that in the two-bubble case, except that the efficiency of gravity-wave generation is about five times higher, presumably due to the fact that a given bubble collides with many others. Finally, we consider two further "statistical" approximations, where the gravitational radiation is computed as an incoherent sum over individual bubbles weighted by the distribution of bubble sizes. These approximations provide reasonable estimates of the gravitational-wave spectrum with far less computation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Witten, E. (1984) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.30.272 · Cited by 3,452
Fate of the false vacuum. II. First quantum corrections
Callan, C. G., & Coleman, S. (1977) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.16.1762 · Cited by 1,789
Cited by
Hindmarsh, M., Huber, S. J., Rummukainen, K., & Weir, D. J. (2015) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.123009 · Cited by 554
Gravitational Waves Induced by Non-Gaussian Scalar Perturbations
Cai, R.-G., Pi, S., & Sasaki, M. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.201101 · Cited by 435
Gravitational Waves from a Dark Phase Transition
Schwaller, P. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.181101 · Cited by 359
Caprini, C., Durrer, R., & Servant, G. (2008) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.124015 · Cited by 320
Gravitational radiation from cosmological turbulence
Kosowsky, A., Mack, A., & Kahniashvili, T. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.024030 · Cited by 309
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kosowsky, A., & Turner, M. S.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1993-05-15
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4372-4391
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117249822
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.