The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tensor-scalar cosmological models and their relaxation toward general relativity
Abstract
Cosmological models within general tensor-multiscalar theories of gravity are studied. By isolating an autonomous evolution equation for the scalar fields, one shows that the expansion of the Universe during the matter-dominated era tends to drive the scalar fields toward a minimum of the function $a(\ensuremath{\phi})$ describing their coupling to matter, i.e., toward a state where the tensor-scalar theory becomes indistinguishable from general relativity. The two main parameters determining the efficiency of this natural attractor mechanism toward general relativity are the redshift at the beginning of the matter era (or equivalently the present cosmological matter density) and the curvature of the coupling function $a(\ensuremath{\phi})$. Quantitative estimates for the present level of deviation from general relativity, as measured by the post-Newtonian parameters $\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{-}1$, $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{-}1$, and $\frac{\stackrel{\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{}}{G}}{G}$, are derived, which give greater significance to future improvements of solar-system gravitational tests. Another prediction of many tensor-scalar scenarios (whose consequences, particularly for the formation of structure in the Universe, remain to be studied in detail) is the existence of strong oscillations of the effective Newtonian coupling strength during the first few Hubble time scales of the matter era.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mach's Principle and a Relativistic Theory of Gravitation
Brans, C., & Dicke, R. H. (1961) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.124.925 · Cited by 5,621
Cited by
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Khoury, J., & Weltman, A. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.044026 · Cited by 1,634
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
General relativistic boson stars
Schunck, F. E., & Mielke, E. W. (2003) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/20/201 · Cited by 745
Metadata
- Authors
- Damour, T., & Nordtvedt, K.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1993-10-15
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3436-3450
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053314888
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.