The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New tests of the universality of free fall
Abstract
We use a continuously rotating torsion balance to make new tests of the universality of free fall (UFF). We study differential accelerations of Be-Cu and Be-Al test-body pairs in the fields of Earth, the Sun, our Galaxy, and in the direction of the cosmic microwave dipole. We also compare the acceleration towards the Sun and our galactic center of Cu and single-crystal Si in an Al shell (this pair of bodies approximates the elemental compositions of Earth's core and the Moon or Earth's crust, respectively). In terms of the classic UFF parameter \ensuremath{\eta}, our Earth-source results are \ensuremath{\eta}(Be,Cu)=(-1.9\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2.5)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}12}$ and \ensuremath{\eta}(Be,Al)=(-0.2\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2.8)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}12}$ where all errors are 1\ensuremath{\sigma}. Thus our limit on UFF violation for Be and a composite Al/Cu body is \ensuremath{\eta}=(-1.1\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.9)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}12}$. Our solar-source results are \ensuremath{\Delta}a(Be,Cu) =(-3.0\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}3.6)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}12}$ cm/${\mathrm{s}}^{2}$, \ensuremath{\Delta}a(Be,Al)=(+2.4\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}5.8)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}12}$ cm/${\mathrm{s}}^{2}$, and \ensuremath{\Delta}a(Si/Al,Cu)=(+3.0 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}4.0)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}12}$ cm/${\mathrm{s}}^{2}$. This latter result, when added to the lunar laser-ranging result that senses both composition-dependent forces and gravitational binding-energy anomalies, yields a nearly model-independent test of the UFF for gravitational binding energy at the 1% level.A fivefold tighter limit follows if composition-dependent interactions are restricted to vector forces. Our galactic-source results test the UFF for ordinary matter attracted toward dark matter, yielding ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\eta}}}^{\mathrm{DM}}$(Be,Cu)=(-1.3\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.9)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}3}$, ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\eta}}}^{\mathrm{DM}}$(Be,Al)=(+1.8\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.4)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}3}$, and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\eta}}}^{\mathrm{DM}}$(Si/Al,Cu)=(+0.7 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.0)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}3}$. This provides laboratory confirmation of the usual assumption that gravity is the dominant long-range interaction between dark and luminous matter. We also test Weber's claim that solar neutrinos scatter coherently from single crystals with cross sections \ensuremath{\sim}${10}^{23}$ times larger than the generally accepted value and rule out the existence of such cross sections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Weak Interactions and Eötvös Experiments
Haugan, M. P., & Will, C. M. (1976) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.37.1 · Cited by 149
Cited by
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
Quintessence and the Rest of the World: Suppressing Long-Range Interactions
Carroll, S. M. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3067 · Cited by 1,172
The fundamental constants and their variation: observational and theoretical status
Uzan, J.-P. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.403 · Cited by 1,162
Metadata
- Authors
- Su, Y., Heckel, B. R., Adelberger, E. G., Gundlach, J. H., Harris, M., Smith, G. L., & Swanson, H. E.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1994-09-15
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3614-3636
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104704360
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New tests of the universality of free fall. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.50.3614
- The paper
- Su, Y., Heckel, B. R., Adelberger, E. G., Gundlach, J. H., Harris, M., Smith, G. L., & Swanson, H. E. (1994). New tests of the universality of free fall. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.50.3614
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.