Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Actions for signature change

Embacher, Franz·1995·Physical Review D

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.51.6764

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Vilenkin-Linde tunneling wave function formalism, the Euclidean action enters with different sign, so probabilities are P ∼ exp(I).

    “In a sense, the Euclidean action enters this formalism with different sign, so that one ends up with probabilities P ∼ exp(I).”

    From Dimensionality, topology, energy, the cosmological constant and signature change (1996) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says the Euclidean part of the action may be assigned a minus sign relative to the Lorentzian part. It does not identify this as the Vilenkin–Linde tunneling-wave-function formalism or state that probabilities are P ∼ exp(I). (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. S. W. Hawking, 1984, Nucl. Phys., B239, 257, 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90093-2 · DOI
  2. G. W. Gibbons, 1990, Phys. Rev. D, 42, 2458, 10.1103/PhysRevD.42.2458 · DOI · Paper page
  3. S. A. Hayward, 1992, Class. Quantum Grav., 9, 1851, 10.1088/0264-9381/9/8/007 · DOI
  4. S. A. Hayward, 1993, Class. Quantum Grav., 10, L7, 10.1088/0264-9381/10/1/002 · DOI
  5. G. Ellis, 1992, Class. Quantum Grav., 9, 1535, 10.1088/0264-9381/9/6/011 · DOI
  6. G. F. R. Ellis, 1992, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 24, 1047, 10.1007/BF00756946 · DOI
  7. T. Dereli, 1993, Class. Quantum Grav., 10, 365, 10.1088/0264-9381/10/2/018 · DOI
  8. R. Kerner, 1993, Class. Quantum Grav., 10, 2111, 10.1088/0264-9381/10/10/019 · DOI
  9. T. Dray, 1991, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 23, 967, 10.1007/BF00756915 · DOI
  10. T. Dray, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 48, 2587, 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.2587 · DOI
  11. C. Hellaby, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 49, 5096, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.5096 · DOI
  12. T. Dray, 1994, J. Math. Phys., 35, 5922, 10.1063/1.530719 · DOI
  13. J. Martin, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 49, 5086, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.5086 · DOI
  14. F. Embacher, 1995, Gravit. Cosmology, 1, 47
  15. M. Kossowski, 1993, Class. Quantum Grav., 10, 2363, 10.1088/0264-9381/10/11/019 · DOI
  16. M. Kossowski, 1993, Class. Quantum Grav., 10, 1157, 10.1088/0264-9381/10/6/012 · DOI
  17. M. Kossowski, 1994, Proc. R. Soc. London A, 444, 297, 10.1098/rspa.1994.0019 · DOI · Paper page
  18. M. Kossowski, 1994, Proc. R. Soc. London A, 446, 115, 10.1098/rspa.1994.0095 · DOI
  19. M. Kriele, 1995, Class. Quantum Grav., 12, 503, 10.1088/0264-9381/12/2/019 · DOI
  20. G. W. Gibbons, 1977, Phys. Rev. D, 15, 2752, 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2752 · DOI · Paper page
  21. B. DeWitt, 1967, Phys. Rev., 160, 1113, 10.1103/PhysRev.160.1113 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Embacher, F.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1995-06-15
Volume
51
Issue
12
Pages
6764-6777
ISSN
0556-2821
Cited by
19
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review