The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: Parameter estimation using second-post-Newtonian waveforms
Open accessAbstract
The parameters of inspiraling compact binaries can be estimated using matched filtering of gravitational-waveform templates against the output of laser-interferometric gravitational-wave detectors. The estimates are most sensitive to the accuracy with which the phases of the template and signal waveforms match over the many cycles received in the detector frequency bandwidth. Using a recently calculated formula, accurate to second post-Newtonian (2PN) order [order (v/c${)}^{4}$, where v is the orbital velocity], for the frequency sweep (dF/dt) induced by gravitational radiation damping, we study the statistical errors in the determination of such source parameters as the ``chirp mass'' scrM, reduced mass \ensuremath{\mu}, and spin parameters \ensuremath{\beta} and \ensuremath{\sigma} (related to spin-orbit and spin-spin effects, respectively). We find that previous results using template phasing accurate to 1.5PN order actually underestimated the errors in scrM, \ensuremath{\mu}, and \ensuremath{\beta}. Templates with 2PN phasing yield somewhat larger measurement errors because the 2PN corrections act to suppress slightly the importance of spin-orbit contributions to the phase, thereby increasing the measurement error on \ensuremath{\beta}. This, in turn, results in larger measurement errors on scrM and \ensuremath{\mu} because of the strong correlations among the parameters. For two inspiraling neutron stars, the measurement errors increase by less than 16%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Self-citationTheory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Self-citationAbbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, N., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., Agarwal, D., et al. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039 · Cited by 1,754
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
Self-citationGW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass ∼ 3.4 M⊙
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5 · Cited by 1,603
Metadata
- Authors
- Poisson, E., & Will, C. M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1995-07-15
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 848-855
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985536898
- Cited by
- 515
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: Parameter estimation using second-post-Newtonian waveforms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.52.848
- The paper
- Poisson, E., & Will, C. M. (1995). Gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: Parameter estimation using second-post-Newtonian waveforms. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.52.848
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.