The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relativity parameters determined from lunar laser ranging
Abstract
Analysis of 24 years of lunar laser ranging data is used to test the principle of equivalence, geodetic precession, the PPN parameters \ensuremath{\beta} and \ensuremath{\gamma}, and G\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{}/G. Recent data can be fitted with a rms scatter of 3 cm. (a) Using the Nordtvedt effect to test the principle of equivalence, it is found that the Moon and Earth accelerate alike in the Sun's field. The relative accelerations match to within 5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}13}$. This limit, combined with an independent determination of \ensuremath{\gamma} from planetary time delay, gives \ensuremath{\beta}. Including the uncertainty due to compositional differences, the parameter \ensuremath{\beta} differs from unity by no more than 0.0014; and, if the weak equivalence principle is satisfied, the difference is no more than 0.0006. (b) Geodetic precession matches its expected 19.2 marc sec/yr rate within 0.7%. This corresponds to a 1% test of \ensuremath{\gamma}. (c) Apart from the Nordtvedt effect, \ensuremath{\beta} and \ensuremath{\gamma} can be tested from their influence on the lunar orbit. It is argued theoretically that the linear combination 0.8\ensuremath{\beta}+1.4\ensuremath{\gamma} can be tested at the 1% level of accuracy. For solutions using numerically derived partial derivatives, higher sensitivity is found. Both \ensuremath{\beta} and \ensuremath{\gamma} match the values of general relativity to within 0.005, and the linear combination \ensuremath{\beta}+\ensuremath{\gamma} matches to within 0.003, but caution is advised due to the lack of theoretical understanding of these sensitivities. (d) No evidence for a changing gravitational constant is found, with |G\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{}/G|\ensuremath{\le}8\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}12}$/yr. There is significant sensitivity to G\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{}/G through solar perturbations on the lunar orbit. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fourth test of general relativity
Shapiro, I. I. (1964) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.789 · Cited by 1,137
High-precision timing of millisecond pulsars. 3: Long-term monitoring of PSRs B1855+09 and B1937+21
Kaspi, V. M., Taylor, J. H., & Ryba, M. F. (1994) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/174280 · Cited by 595
Relativity in Astrometry, Celestial Mechanics and Geodesy
Soffel, M. H. (1989) · Astronomy and Astrophysics Library · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-73406-9 · Cited by 366
Cited by
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERM
SAHNI, V., & STAROBINSKY, A. (2000) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271800000542 · Cited by 2,767
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
The fundamental constants and their variation: observational and theoretical status
Uzan, J.-P. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.403 · Cited by 1,162
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, J. G., Newhall, X. X., & Dickey, J. O.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1996-06-15
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6730-6739
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2121016636
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.