The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tensor-scalar gravity and binary-pulsar experiments
Open accessAbstract
Some recently discovered nonperturbative strong-field effects in tensor-scalar theories of gravitation are interpreted as a scalar analogue of ferromagnetism: "spontaneous scalarization." This phenomenon leads to very significant deviations from general relativity in conditions involving strong gravitational fields, notably binary-pulsar experiments. Contrary to solar-system experiments, these deviations do not necessarily vanish when the weak-field scalar coupling tends to zero. We compute the scalar "form factors" measuring these deviations, and notably a parameter entering the pulsar timing observable $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ through scalar-field-induced variations of the inertia moment of the pulsar. An exploratory investigation of the confrontation between tensor-scalar theories and binary-pulsar experiments shows that nonperturbative scalar field effects are already very tightly constrained by published data on three binary-pulsar systems. We contrast the probing power of pulsar experiments with that of solar-system ones by plotting the regions they exclude in a generic two-dimensional plane of tensor-scalar theories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mach's Principle and a Relativistic Theory of Gravitation
Brans, C., & Dicke, R. H. (1961) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.124.925 · Cited by 5,621
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (1993) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511564246 · Cited by 3,632
Cited by
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Liebling, S. L., & Palenzuela, C. (2017) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-017-0007-y · Cited by 371
Gravitational-wave versus binary-pulsar tests of strong-field gravity
Damour, T., & Esposito-Farèse, G. (1998) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.58.042001 · Cited by 249
Self-citationBig bang nucleosynthesis constraints on scalar-tensor theories of gravity
Coc, A., Olive, K. A., Uzan, J.-P., & Vangioni, E. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.083525 · Cited by 124
Big bang nucleosynthesis and tensor-scalar gravity
Damour, T., & Pichon, B. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.123502 · Cited by 107
Self-citationTesting theories of gravity with planetary ephemerides
Fienga, A., & Minazzoli, O. (2024) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-023-00047-0 · Cited by 45
Fundamental constants: from measurement to the universe, a window on gravitation and cosmology
Uzan, J.-P. (2025) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-025-00059-y · Cited by 36
String Theory, Gravity and Experiment
Damour, T., & Lilley, M. (2008) · Les Houches · doi:10.1016/s0924-8099(08)80027-3 · Cited by 35
Self-citationTesting extra dimensions with the binary pulsar
Durrer, R., & Kocian, P. (2004) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/8/015 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Damour, T., & Esposito-Farèse, G.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1996-07-15
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1474-1491
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2152747485
- Cited by
- 614
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.