Cited by 68Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum fluctuations and CMB anisotropies in one-bubble open inflation models

Open access

Abstract

We first develop a method to calculate a complete set of mode functions that describe the quantum fluctuations generated in one-bubble open inflation models. We consider two classes of models. One is a single scalar field model proposed by Bucher, Goldhaber, and Turok and by us as an example of the open inflation scenario, and the other is a two-field model such as the "supernatural" inflation proposed by Linde and Mezhlumian. In both cases we assume the difference in the vacuum energy density between inside and outside the bubble is negligible. There are two kinds of mode functions. One kind has the usual continuous spectrum and the other has a discrete spectrum with characteristic wavelengths exceeding the spatial curvature scale. The latter can be further divided into two classes in terms of its origin. One is called the de Sitter supercurvature mode, which arises due to the global spacetime structure of de Sitter space, and the other is due to fluctuations of the bubble wall. We calculate the spectrum of quantum fluctuations in these models and evaluate the resulting large angular scale CMB anisotropies. We find there are ranges of model parameters that are consistent with observed CMB anisotropies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.54.5031

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the present case, all three measures mentioned (comoving probability, causal patch, and scale-factor cutoff) give similar predictions.

    “however in the present case it turns out that all three measures mentioned above give similar predictions [66,67,68,69].”

    From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [68]

    The paper’s Section IV compares CMB anisotropy spectra from open-inflation models, and its Conclusion says those models predict practically the same CMB power spectrum at certain scales. Neither passage addresses whether comoving probability, causal patch, and scale-factor cutoff measures give similar predictions. Searches for those measures and for a comparison of measure predictions found no relevant passage in our copy; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The combination of prior and anthropic effects places most observers in spacetime regions where Ω_curv is unobservably small, but gives a reasonable probability of order ten percent to observe Ω_curv ~ 10^-5.

    “The combination of these effects places most observers in spacetime regions in which Ω 0 curv is unobservably small (i.e.below cosmic variance), but at the same time gives a reasonable probability, roughly of order ten percent chance, to observe Ω 0 curv 10 -5 [68,69].”

    From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Introduction discusses an open-universe inflation scenario, and the Conclusion discusses its predicted CMB anisotropies; neither addresses how prior and anthropic effects distribute observers. Searches for observers, anthropic effects, cosmic variance, and a ten-percent probability of observing curvature near 10^-5 found no supporting passage. The roughly 10% figure in Section III refers to possible calculation errors, not an observation probability. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. P. J. E. Peebles, 1993, Principle of Physical Cosmology
  2. B. Ratra, 1994, Astrophys. J., 432, L5, 10.1086/187498 · DOI
  3. J. R. Primack, 1995, Particle and Nuclear Astrophysics and Cosmology in the Next Millennium
  4. M. Bucher, 1995, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.)
  5. M. Bucher, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 5538, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.5538 · DOI
  6. K. Yamamoto, 1995, Astrophys. J., 455, 412, 10.1086/176588 · DOI · Paper page
  7. A. D. Linde, 1995, Phys. Lett. B, 351, 99, 10.1016/0370-2693(95)00370-Z · DOI
  8. A. D. Linde, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 5538, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.6789 · DOI
  9. S. Coleman, 1977, Phys. Rev. D, 15, 2929, 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2929 · DOI · Paper page
  10. K. Yamamoto, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 51, 2968, 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.2968 · DOI
  11. T. Hamazaki, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 53, 2045, 10.1103/PhysRevD.53.2045 · DOI
  12. M. Sasaki, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 51, 2979, 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.2979 · DOI · Paper page
  13. K. Yamamoto, 1996, Astrophys. J., 464, 8, 10.1086/177295 · DOI
  14. J. Garriga, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 4764, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.4764 · DOI
  15. J. Garcia-Bellido, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 2473, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.2473 · DOI
  16. T. Tanaka, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 49, 1039, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.1039 · DOI
  17. T. Tanaka, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 50, 6444, 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.6444 · DOI
  18. V. A. Rubakov, 1984, Nucl. Phys., B245, 481, 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90443-7 · DOI
  19. H. E. Kandrup, 1989, Phys. Lett. B, 225, 222, 10.1016/0370-2693(89)90809-5 · DOI
  20. H. E. Kandrup, 1990, Phys. Rev. D, 42, 3401, 10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3401 · DOI
  21. T. Vachaspati, 1991, Phys. Rev. D, 43, 3846, 10.1103/PhysRevD.43.3846 · DOI
  22. M. Sasaki, 1993, Prog. Theor. Phys., 90, 1019, 10.1143/ptp/90.5.1019 · DOI
  23. M. Sasaki, 1993, Phys. Lett. B, 317, 510, 10.1016/0370-2693(93)91364-S · DOI
  24. J. L. Gervais, 1977, Phys. Rev. D, 15, 3507, 10.1103/PhysRevD.16.3507 · DOI
  25. D. Lyth, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 3338, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.3338 · DOI
  26. J. Garcia-Bellido, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 6750, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.6750 · DOI
  27. C. G. Callan, 1977, Phys. Rev. D, 16, 1762, 10.1103/PhysRevD.16.1762 · DOI · Paper page
  28. D. H. Lyth, 1990, Phys. Lett. B, 252, 336, 10.1016/0370-2693(90)90548-K · DOI
  29. B. Ratra, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 1837, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.1837 · DOI
  30. M. Kamionkowski, 1994, Astrophys. J., 434, L1, 10.1086/187558 · DOI
  31. K. M. Gorski, 1995, Astrophys. J., 444, L65, 10.1086/187861 · DOI
  32. N. Gouda, 1991, Prog. Theor. Phys., 85, 1023, 10.1143/ptp/85.5.1023 · DOI
  33. H. Kodama, 1984, Prog. Theor. Phys., 78, 1, 10.1143/PTPS.78.1 · DOI
  34. S. Coleman, 1985, Aspects of Symmetry, 10.1017/CBO9780511565045 · DOI
  35. S. Coleman, 1978, Commun. Math. Phys., 58, 211, 10.1007/BF01609421 · DOI
  36. S. Parke, 1983, Phys. Lett., 121B, 313, 10.1016/0370-2693(83)91376-X · DOI
  37. C. L. Bennett, 1994, Astrophys. J., 436, 423, 10.1086/174918 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yamamoto, K., Sasaki, M., & Tanaka, T.
Affiliations
Hiroshima University (JP)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1996-10-15
Volume
54
Issue
8
Pages
5031-5048
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2116191823
Cited by
68
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Hiroshima University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Hiroshima University Acedemic Information Repository (Hiroshima University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (07304033)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
open inflation, quantum fluctuations, cosmic microwave background anisotropies, mode functions, two-field inflation, scalar field inflation, discrete spectrum, angular power spectrum, spatial curvature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review