Cited by 155Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Large-Angle Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy in an Open Universe in the One-Bubble Inflationary Scenario

Open access
Yamamoto, Kazuhiro, Sasaki, Misao, Tanaka, Takahiro·1995·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We consider an alternative scenario of inflation which can account for a spatially open universe. It is similar to the old inflation in which the bubble nucleation occurs in the sea of the false vacuum, but it differs from the old inflation in that the second slow rollover inflation occurs inside a nucleated bubble. Hence, our observable universe is entirely contained in one nucleated bubble. The significance of the scenario is that apart from a variance caused by model parameters, it gives us a definite prediction on the spectrum of the primordial density perturbations, and hence it is observationally testable. Here we investigate the spectrum of cosmic microwave background anisotropies on large angular scales. We find that the contribution from peculiar modes which never appear in the usual harmonic analysis is significant in the case Ω0 ≲ 0.1.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/176588

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the present case, all three measures mentioned (comoving probability, causal patch, and scale-factor cutoff) give similar predictions.

    “however in the present case it turns out that all three measures mentioned above give similar predictions [66,67,68,69].”

    From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [67]

    Section III compares CMB predictions for different vacuum states, and Section IV discusses when those predictions differ. Neither addresses whether comoving probability, causal patch, and scale-factor cutoff measures give similar predictions; searches for those measure terms found no relevant passage. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Birrell, N. D., & Davies, P. C. W. 1982, Quantum elds in curved space, Cambridge University Press
  2. Bunch, T. S., & Davies, P. C. W. 1978, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A360, 117
  3. Hamazaki, T., Sasaki, M., Tanaka, T., & Yamamoto, K. 1995, preprint in preparation Kamionkowski, M., Ratra, B., Spergel, D. N., & Sugiyama,N. 1994, preprint PUTP-1470, astro-ph/9406069 · arXiv
  4. Kolb, E., & Turner, M. 1990, The Early Universe, (Addison Wes- ley), Section 8
  5. Peebles, P. J. E. 1993, Principle of Physical Cosmology, Princeton universe press
  6. Rattra, B., & Peebles, P. J. E. 1994a, Astrophys. J. 432, L5; and references therein ||. 1994b, preprint PUPT-1444
  7. Sasaki, M., Tanaka, T., & Yamamoto, K. 1994, preprint KUNS 1308, to be published in Phys. Rev. D ||. 1994, Phys. Rev. D49, 1039
  8. Weinberg, S. 1972, Gravitation and Cosmology, New York:Wiley
  9. Yamamoto,K., Tanaka, T., & Sasaki, M. 1994, preprint KUNS1305, to be published in Phys. Rev. D

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yamamoto, K., Sasaki, M., & Tanaka, T.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1995-12
Volume
455
Pages
412
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2950545517
Cited by
155
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
17.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (05640342)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
cosmic microwave background anisotropies, open universe, bubble nucleation, false vacuum, slow-roll inflation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review