Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Naive dimensional analysis and supersymmetry

Open access
Luty, Markus A.·1998·Physical Review D

Abstract

In strongly coupled theories with no small parameters, there are factors of 4\ensuremath{\pi} that appear when the couplings of the low-energy effective Lagrangian are written in units of the effective cutoff \ensuremath{\Lambda}. These numerical factors can be explained using ``naive dimensional analysis.'' We extend these ideas to supersymmetric theories, and show how to systematically include small parameters and couplings to weakly interacting fields. The basic principle is that, if the fundamental theory is strongly coupled, then the effective theory must also be strongly coupled at the scale \ensuremath{\Lambda}. We use our results to analyze several examples where strong supersymmetric dynamics may be relevant for phenomenology. For models that break supersymmetry through strong dynamics with no small parameters, we show that the Goldstino decay constant $F$ is given by $F\ensuremath{\sim}{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}^{2}/(4\ensuremath{\pi}).$ We also consider theories with standard-model gauge bosons coupled directly to strong supersymmetry-breaking dynamics near the weak scale, smoothly confining theories, and a model that breaks supersymmetry through the mechanism of a deformed moduli space.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.57.1531

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Luty, M. A.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1998-02-01
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
1531-1538
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2106421098
Cited by
163
References
0
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Naive dimensional analysis and supersymmetry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.57.1531
The paper
Luty, M. A. (1998). Naive dimensional analysis and supersymmetry. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.57.1531

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.