The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bounding the mass of the graviton using gravitational-wave observations of inspiralling compact binaries
Open accessAbstract
If gravitation is propagated by a massive field, then the velocity of gravitational waves (gravitons) will depend upon their frequency as ${(v}_{g}{/c)}^{2}=1\ensuremath{-}(c/f{\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{g}{)}^{2}$, and the effective Newtonian potential will have a Yukawa form $\ensuremath{\propto}{r}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\mathrm{exp}(\ensuremath{-}r/{\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{g})$, where ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{g}{=h/m}_{g}c$ is the graviton Compton wavelength. In the case of inspiralling compact binaries, gravitational waves emitted at low frequency early in the inspiral will travel slightly slower than those emitted at high frequency later, resulting in an offset in the relative arrival times at a detector. This modifies the phase evolution of the observed inspiral gravitational waveform, similar to that caused by post-Newtonian corrections to quadrupole phasing. Matched filtering of the waveforms could bound such frequency-dependent variations in propagation speed, and thereby bound the graviton mass. The bound depends on the mass of the source and on noise characteristics of the detector, but is independent of the distance to the source, except for weak cosmological redshift effects. For observations of stellar-mass compact inspiral using ground-based interferometers of the LIGO-VIRGO type, the bound on ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{g}$ could be of the order of $6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{12}$ km, about double that from solar-system tests of Yukawa modifications of Newtonian gravity. For observations of massive black hole binary inspiral at cosmological distances using the proposed Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), the bound could be as large as $6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{16}$ km. This is three orders of magnitude weaker than model-dependent bounds from galactic cluster dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Massive and mass-less Yang-Mills and gravitational fields
van Dam, H., & Veltman, M. (1970) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(70)90416-5 · Cited by 1,288
Cited by
Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 · Cited by 14,151
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Self-citationTheory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Self-citationTests of General Relativity with GW150914
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.221101 · Cited by 1,773
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Will, C. M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1998-02-15
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2061-2068
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W1983439542
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bounding the mass of the graviton using gravitational-wave observations of inspiralling compact binaries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.57.2061
- The paper
- Will, C. M. (1998). Bounding the mass of the graviton using gravitational-wave observations of inspiralling compact binaries. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.57.2061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.