Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 529

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Anomalies on Quasi-Renormalizable Theories

Gross, David J., Jackiw, R.·1972·Physical Review D

Abstract

Apparently nonrenormalizable field theories, such as the new models for weak interactions, can become renormalizable when gauge invariance of the second kind is present. However, the anomaly associated with the axial-vector current may destroy this gauge invariance in perturbation theory, even though it is present in the Lagrangian. When this happens the theory remains nonrenormalizable. Nevertheless it is possible, by enlarging the theory, to remove the anomaly at the expense of introducing additional fermion fields, which correspond to as-yet-unobserved particles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.6.477

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gross, D. J., & Jackiw, R.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1972-07-15
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
477-493
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119951960
Cited by
529
References
1
FWCI
15.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.