Physical aspects of the space–time torsion
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Torsion-induced bounces have been realized in Einstein-Cartan and related torsionful models, including spinor-based constructions in which a single Dirac field drives both ekpyrotic contraction and a torsion-supported bounce.
“Torsion-induced bounces have also been realized in Einstein-Cartan and related torsionful models, including spinor-based constructions in which a single Dirac field drives both ekpyrotic contraction and a torsionsupported bounce [11-13, 22, 28, 29].”
From Dynamical systems analysis of an Einstein–Cartan ekpyrotic nonsingular bounce cosmology (2026) · cites this paper as [12]
Section 2.6 (p. 23) describes an Einstein–Cartan cosmological solution in which torsion prevents a singularity and produces a bounce. It does not describe a single Dirac field driving ekpyrotic contraction as well as the bounce; its example instead assumes a nonzero average spinor current. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn a microscopic Einstein-Cartan treatment, the spin-torsion contribution for a fermion fluid can be written schematically as ρs ∼ ξ n^2 / M_Pl^2, where n is the fermion number density and ξ = O(1) depends on spin representation and conventions.
“In a microscopic Einstein-Cartan treatment, the spintorsion contribution for a fermion fluid can be written schematically as ρ s ∼ ξ n 2 M 2 Pl , (45 ) where n is the fermion number density and ξ = O(1) depends on spin representation and conventions [11][12][13]33].”
From Dynamical systems analysis of an Einstein–Cartan ekpyrotic nonsingular bounce cosmology (2026) · cites this paper as [12]
Section 2.2, equations (2.21)–(2.22), gives a torsion-induced spin–spin interaction proportional to the spin tensor squared divided by the Planck mass squared. Section 2.6 (p. 21) likewise gives a term proportional to G times the axial-current squared, with a convention-dependent coefficient. The copy does not explicitly express either result as an energy density proportional to fermion number density squared or establish the claimed ξ = O(1) dependence on spin representation. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe -ρs term in the Friedmann equation and the -2ρs term in the Raychaudhuri equation follow directly from the algebraic Einstein-Cartan/Weyssenhoff reduction, rather than from an added sign choice.
“So the -ρ s term in Friedmann and the -2ρ s term in Raychaudhuri follow directly from the algebraic Einstein-Cartan/Weyssenhoff reduction, rather than from an added sign choice [11][12][13].”
From Dynamical systems analysis of an Einstein–Cartan ekpyrotic nonsingular bounce cosmology (2026) · cites this paper as [12]
Section 2.6 (pp. 21–22) shows torsion being eliminated algebraically from an Einstein–Cartan action, producing a current-squared term and a cosmological scale-factor equation. It does not derive the claimed −ρ_s Friedmann and −2ρ_s Raychaudhuri terms for a Weyssenhoff fluid. The example also explicitly includes an arbitrary coefficient θ, so it does not establish those precise terms independently of coefficient choices. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn EC theory, algebraically eliminating torsion gives a quadratic spin correction that enters the effective FLRW background equations with negative sign, so the torsion sector acts as an effective fluid with ρtor=-ρs, ptor=-ρs and stiff equation of state wtor=1.
“In Einstein-Cartan theory, algebraically eliminating torsion gives a quadratic spin correction.With the conventions used here, that correction enters the effective FLRW background equations with negative sign.I denote its magnitude by ρ s > 0 and write the torsion sector as an effective fluid, ρ tor ≡ -ρ s , p tor ≡ -ρ s ,”
From Dynamical systems analysis of an Einstein–Cartan ekpyrotic nonsingular bounce cosmology (2026) · cites this paper as [12]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn ECSK theory, torsion is sourced algebraically by the spin current and does not propagate; for a Dirac field it is fixed locally by the axial spin current.
“The coupling of spin to torsion is described by the Einstein-Cartan-Sciama-Kibble action, where the affine connection has an antisymmetric part and the spin current sources torsion [11,12].”
From Dynamical systems analysis of an Einstein–Cartan ekpyrotic nonsingular bounce cosmology (2026) · cites this paper as [12]
In EC theory, the intrinsic spin of fermions sources spacetime torsion, which at very high densities acts like a negative stiff component and can support a nonsingular bounce in homogeneous EC models without introducing new propagating degrees of freedom beyond GR plus matter.
“In EC gravity the intrinsic spin of fermions sources spacetime torsion, which at very high densities acts like a negative stiff component [11][12][13].This purely geometric effect can, in homogeneous EC models, support a nonsingular bounce without introducing new propagating degrees of freedom beyond GR plus matter.”
From Dynamical systems analysis of an Einstein–Cartan ekpyrotic nonsingular bounce cosmology (2026) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity
Starobinsky, A. A. (1980) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-x · Cited by 7,677 · see citing works
Colladay, D., & Kostelecký, V. A. (1997) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.6760 · Cited by 1,779 · see citing works
Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time
Fulling, S. A. (1989) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139172073 · Cited by 1,121 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- [4]D.V. Alekseev and I.L. Shapiro, Izv. VUZov Fiz. - Sov. J. Phys. 33,n3 (1990) 34.
- [11]I.G. Avramidi, Heat kernel and quantum gravity. (Springer-Verlag, 2000).
- [13]V.G. Bagrov, I.L. Buchbinder and I.L. Shapiro, Izv. VUZov, Fisica - Sov.J.Phys. 35,n3 (1992)
- [16]A.O. Barvinsky and G.A. Vilkovisky, Phys. Rep. 119, 1 (1985).
- [20]F.A. Berezin, Uspekhi Fiz. Nauk. 132 (1980) 497. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9406122 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9707412 · arXiv
- [23]N.D. Birell and P.C.W. Davies, Quantum fields in curved space (Cambridge Univ. Press,
- Physics, Adelaide, Australia, March 2000". [hep-ph/0006033]. · arXiv
- Quantization of Fields with Constraints (Springer-Verlag, 1990);
- [38]I.L. Buchbinder, I.L. Shapiro, Izv. VUZov Fizika (Sov. J. Phys.) 31,n9 (1988) 40.
- [40]I.L. Buchbinder, I.L. Shapiro and E.G. Yagunov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A5 (1990) 1599. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0006033 · arXiv
- [55]J.C. Collins, Renormalization, (Cambridge University Press, 1984).
- [66]A. Dobado and A.L. Maroto, Class.Quant.Grav. 16 (1999) 4057. http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0101038 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0005236 · arXiv
- University Press, 1992).
- [73]J.C. Fabris, A.M. Pelinson, I.L. Shapiro, Grav. Cosmol. 6 (2000) 59 – [gr-qc/9810032]; On the gravitational waves on the background of anomaly-induced inflation. Nucl. Phys. B, to be · arXiv
- Press, Cambridge, 1989).
- [88]M. Goroff and A. Sagnotti, Phys. Lett. 160B (1985) 81. http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9810032 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9910180 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9910180 · arXiv
- Italy, 11-19 May 1995, [gr-qc/9602013]. · arXiv
- [94]C.M. Hall, Lectures on non-linear sigma models and strings. (Cambridge, 1987. DAMTP).
- Press. Cambridge, 1979.)
- [108]K. Ishikawa, Phys.Rev. 28D (1983) 2445. http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9602013 · arXiv
- [109]C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory, (McGraw-Hill, 1980).
- [114]S.V. Ketov, Quantum Non-Linear Sigma Models : From Quantum Field Theory to Super- symmetry, Conformal Field Theory, Black Holes, and Strings. (Springer Verlag, 2000).
- 1999, Fort Luderdale, Florida, December 1997". [hep-ph/0005280]. · arXiv
- Indiana, 1998, [hep-ph/9904467]. · arXiv
- [122]P.Langasker, M.Luo and A.Mann, Rev.Mod.Phys. 64, 86 (1992)
- [126]L3 Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B370 (1996) 195; CERN-PPE/97-52, L3 preprint 117 (May
- [128]N.E. Mavromatos, J.Phys. A21 (1988) 2279. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0005280 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9904467 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9703428 · arXiv
- [154]R.J. Reigert, Phys.Lett. 134B (1980) 56. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/9701010 · arXiv
- PhD dissertation, (Tomsk State University, Russia, 1-158, 1985).
- [174]W.P.A. Souder et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 65, 694 (1990).
- [186]R.M. Wald, General Relativity. (University of Chicago Press, 1984).
- [188]S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields: Foundations. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model
Kostelecký, V. A. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.105009 · Cited by 1,368 · see citing works
Cosmology with torsion: An alternative to cosmic inflation
Popławski, N. J. (2010) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.09.056 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Nonsingular, big-bounce cosmology from spinor-torsion coupling
Popławski, N. (2012) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.107502 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY
Popławski, N. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/832/2/96 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Dynamical systems analysis of an Einstein–Cartan ekpyrotic nonsingular bounce cosmology
Stingley, J. (2026) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-026-03547-w
- Authors
- Shapiro, I. L.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Shapiro, I.L.
- ORCID
- Shapiro, I.L.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 357
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-213
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130702733
- Cited by
- 671
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physics Reports (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- spacetime torsion, torsion theories, renormalization group, effective potential, anomalies, spinning particles, spinless particles, quantum field theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review