Cited by 671Relativity and Gravitational TheoryNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesCosmology and Gravitation Theories

Physical aspects of the space–time torsion

Open access
Shapiro, I.L.·2002·Physics Reports

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00030-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Torsion-induced bounces have been realized in Einstein-Cartan and related torsionful models, including spinor-based constructions in which a single Dirac field drives both ekpyrotic contraction and a torsion-supported bounce.

    “Torsion-induced bounces have also been realized in Einstein-Cartan and related torsionful models, including spinor-based constructions in which a single Dirac field drives both ekpyrotic contraction and a torsionsupported bounce [11-13, 22, 28, 29].”

    From Dynamical systems analysis of an Einstein–Cartan ekpyrotic nonsingular bounce cosmology (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

    Section 2.6 (p. 23) describes an Einstein–Cartan cosmological solution in which torsion prevents a singularity and produces a bounce. It does not describe a single Dirac field driving ekpyrotic contraction as well as the bounce; its example instead assumes a nonzero average spinor current. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a microscopic Einstein-Cartan treatment, the spin-torsion contribution for a fermion fluid can be written schematically as ρs ∼ ξ n^2 / M_Pl^2, where n is the fermion number density and ξ = O(1) depends on spin representation and conventions.

    “In a microscopic Einstein-Cartan treatment, the spintorsion contribution for a fermion fluid can be written schematically as ρ s ∼ ξ n 2 M 2 Pl , (45 ) where n is the fermion number density and ξ = O(1) depends on spin representation and conventions [11][12][13]33].”

    From Dynamical systems analysis of an Einstein–Cartan ekpyrotic nonsingular bounce cosmology (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

    Section 2.2, equations (2.21)–(2.22), gives a torsion-induced spin–spin interaction proportional to the spin tensor squared divided by the Planck mass squared. Section 2.6 (p. 21) likewise gives a term proportional to G times the axial-current squared, with a convention-dependent coefficient. The copy does not explicitly express either result as an energy density proportional to fermion number density squared or establish the claimed ξ = O(1) dependence on spin representation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The -ρs term in the Friedmann equation and the -2ρs term in the Raychaudhuri equation follow directly from the algebraic Einstein-Cartan/Weyssenhoff reduction, rather than from an added sign choice.

    “So the -ρ s term in Friedmann and the -2ρ s term in Raychaudhuri follow directly from the algebraic Einstein-Cartan/Weyssenhoff reduction, rather than from an added sign choice [11][12][13].”

    From Dynamical systems analysis of an Einstein–Cartan ekpyrotic nonsingular bounce cosmology (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

    Section 2.6 (pp. 21–22) shows torsion being eliminated algebraically from an Einstein–Cartan action, producing a current-squared term and a cosmological scale-factor equation. It does not derive the claimed −ρ_s Friedmann and −2ρ_s Raychaudhuri terms for a Weyssenhoff fluid. The example also explicitly includes an arbitrary coefficient θ, so it does not establish those precise terms independently of coefficient choices. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In EC theory, algebraically eliminating torsion gives a quadratic spin correction that enters the effective FLRW background equations with negative sign, so the torsion sector acts as an effective fluid with ρtor=-ρs, ptor=-ρs and stiff equation of state wtor=1.

    “In Einstein-Cartan theory, algebraically eliminating torsion gives a quadratic spin correction.With the conventions used here, that correction enters the effective FLRW background equations with negative sign.I denote its magnitude by ρ s > 0 and write the torsion sector as an effective fluid, ρ tor ≡ -ρ s , p tor ≡ -ρ s ,”

    From Dynamical systems analysis of an Einstein–Cartan ekpyrotic nonsingular bounce cosmology (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In ECSK theory, torsion is sourced algebraically by the spin current and does not propagate; for a Dirac field it is fixed locally by the axial spin current.

    “The coupling of spin to torsion is described by the Einstein-Cartan-Sciama-Kibble action, where the affine connection has an antisymmetric part and the spin current sources torsion [11,12].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. [4]D.V. Alekseev and I.L. Shapiro, Izv. VUZov Fiz. - Sov. J. Phys. 33,n3 (1990) 34.
  2. [11]I.G. Avramidi, Heat kernel and quantum gravity. (Springer-Verlag, 2000).
  3. [13]V.G. Bagrov, I.L. Buchbinder and I.L. Shapiro, Izv. VUZov, Fisica - Sov.J.Phys. 35,n3 (1992)
  4. [16]A.O. Barvinsky and G.A. Vilkovisky, Phys. Rep. 119, 1 (1985).
  5. [20]F.A. Berezin, Uspekhi Fiz. Nauk. 132 (1980) 497. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9406122 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9707412 · arXiv
  6. [23]N.D. Birell and P.C.W. Davies, Quantum fields in curved space (Cambridge Univ. Press,
  7. Physics, Adelaide, Australia, March 2000". [hep-ph/0006033]. · arXiv
  8. Quantization of Fields with Constraints (Springer-Verlag, 1990);
  9. [38]I.L. Buchbinder, I.L. Shapiro, Izv. VUZov Fizika (Sov. J. Phys.) 31,n9 (1988) 40.
  10. [40]I.L. Buchbinder, I.L. Shapiro and E.G. Yagunov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A5 (1990) 1599. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0006033 · arXiv
  11. [55]J.C. Collins, Renormalization, (Cambridge University Press, 1984).
  12. [66]A. Dobado and A.L. Maroto, Class.Quant.Grav. 16 (1999) 4057. http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0101038 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0005236 · arXiv
  13. University Press, 1992).
  14. [73]J.C. Fabris, A.M. Pelinson, I.L. Shapiro, Grav. Cosmol. 6 (2000) 59 – [gr-qc/9810032]; On the gravitational waves on the background of anomaly-induced inflation. Nucl. Phys. B, to be · arXiv
  15. Press, Cambridge, 1989).
  16. [88]M. Goroff and A. Sagnotti, Phys. Lett. 160B (1985) 81. http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9810032 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9910180 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9910180 · arXiv
  17. Italy, 11-19 May 1995, [gr-qc/9602013]. · arXiv
  18. [94]C.M. Hall, Lectures on non-linear sigma models and strings. (Cambridge, 1987. DAMTP).
  19. Press. Cambridge, 1979.)
  20. [108]K. Ishikawa, Phys.Rev. 28D (1983) 2445. http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9602013 · arXiv
  21. [109]C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory, (McGraw-Hill, 1980).
  22. [114]S.V. Ketov, Quantum Non-Linear Sigma Models : From Quantum Field Theory to Super- symmetry, Conformal Field Theory, Black Holes, and Strings. (Springer Verlag, 2000).
  23. 1999, Fort Luderdale, Florida, December 1997". [hep-ph/0005280]. · arXiv
  24. Indiana, 1998, [hep-ph/9904467]. · arXiv
  25. [122]P.Langasker, M.Luo and A.Mann, Rev.Mod.Phys. 64, 86 (1992)
  26. [126]L3 Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B370 (1996) 195; CERN-PPE/97-52, L3 preprint 117 (May
  27. [128]N.E. Mavromatos, J.Phys. A21 (1988) 2279. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0005280 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9904467 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9703428 · arXiv
  28. [154]R.J. Reigert, Phys.Lett. 134B (1980) 56. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/9701010 · arXiv
  29. PhD dissertation, (Tomsk State University, Russia, 1-158, 1985).
  30. [174]W.P.A. Souder et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 65, 694 (1990).
  31. [186]R.M. Wald, General Relativity. (University of Chicago Press, 1984).
  32. [188]S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields: Foundations. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shapiro, I. L.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR)
Corresponding author
Shapiro, I.L.
Venue
Physics Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
357
Issue
2
Pages
113-213
ISSN
0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130702733
Cited by
671
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 24
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physics Reports (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
spacetime torsion, torsion theories, renormalization group, effective potential, anomalies, spinning particles, spinless particles, quantum field theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review