Cited by 350Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Black hole formation in the Friedmann universe: Formulation and computation in numerical relativity

Open access
Shibata, Masaru, Sasaki, Misao·1999·Physical Review D

Abstract

We study the formation of black holes in the Friedmann universe. We present a formulation of the Einstein equations under the constant mean curvature time-slicing condition. Our formalism not only gives us the analytic solution of the perturbation equations for nonlinear density and metric fluctuations on superhorizon scales, but also allows us to carry out a numerical relativity simulation for black hole formation after the scale of the density fluctuations is well within the Hubble horizon scale. We perform a numerical simulation of spherically symmetric black hole formation in the radiation-dominated spatially flat background universe for a realistic initial condition supplied from the analytic solution. It is found that the initial metric perturbation has to be nonlinear (the maximum value of three-dimensional conformal factor ${\ensuremath{\psi}}_{0}$ at $t=0$ should be larger than $\ensuremath{\sim}1.4)$ for a black hole to be formed, but the threshold amplitude for black hole formation and the final black hole mass considerably depend on the initial density (or metric) profile of the perturbation: The threshold value of ${\ensuremath{\psi}}_{0}$ at $t=0$ for formation of a black hole is smaller for a high density peak surrounded by a low density region than for that surrounded by the average density region of the flat universe. This suggests that it is necessary to take into account the spatial correlation of density fluctuations in the study of primordial black hole formation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.60.084002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Ya. B. Zel’dovich, 1966, Astron. Zh., 43, 758
  2. S. W. Hawking, 1971, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 152, 75, 10.1093/mnras/152.1.75 · DOI · Paper page
  3. D. K. Nadezin, 1978, Sov. Astron., 22, 129
  4. C. Alcock, 1996, Astrophys. J., 471, 774, 10.1086/178005 · DOI
  5. T. Nakamura, 1997, Astrophys. J. Lett., 487, L139, 10.1086/310886 · DOI
  6. J. Garcia-Bellido, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 6040, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.6040 · DOI
  7. J. Yokoyama, 1998, Phys. Rev. D, 58, 083510, 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.083510 · DOI
  8. B. J. Carr, 1975, Astrophys. J., 201, 1, 10.1086/153853 · DOI · Paper page
  9. P. Ivanov, 1998, Phys. Rev. D, 57, 7145, 10.1103/PhysRevD.57.7145 · DOI
  10. H. Kodama, 1984, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 78, 1, 10.1143/PTPS.78.1 · DOI
  11. M. Sasaki, 1998, Prog. Theor. Phys., 99, 763, 10.1143/PTP.99.763 · DOI · Paper page
  12. J.C. Niemeyer, 1999, Phys. Rev. D, 59, 124013, 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.124013 · DOI · Paper page
  13. K. Jedamzik, 1999, Phys. Rev. D, 124014, 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.124014 · DOI
  14. M. Shibata, 1995, Prog. Theor. Phys., 94, 11, 10.1143/ptp/94.1.11 · DOI
  15. M. Shibata, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 50, 708, 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.708 · DOI
  16. L. Smarr, 1978, Phys. Rev. D, 17, 1945, 10.1103/PhysRevD.17.1945 · DOI
  17. H. Kodama, 1980, Prog. Theor. Phys., 63, 1217, 10.1143/PTP.63.1217 · DOI
  18. G.V. Bicknell, 1979, Astrophys. J., 232, 670, 10.1086/157325 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shibata, M., & Sasaki, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1999-09-08
Volume
60
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W1974098534
Cited by
350
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (09640355)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Keywords
primordial black holes, black hole formation, Friedmann universe, Einstein field equations, density perturbations, metric perturbations, superhorizon scales, radiation-dominated universe, spherical collapse, conformal factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review