The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Event-by-event fluctuations in heavy ion collisions and the QCD critical point
Open accessAbstract
The event-by-event fluctuations of suitably chosen observables in heavy ion collisions at CERN SPS, BNL RHIC, and CERN LHC can tell us about the thermodynamic properties of the hadronic system at freeze-out. By studying these fluctuations as a function of varying control parameters, it is possible to learn much about the phase diagram of QCD. As a timely example, we stress the methods by which present experiments at the CERN SPS can locate the second-order critical end point of the first-order transition between quark-gluon plasma and hadron matter. Those event-by-event signatures which are characteristic of freeze-out in the vicinity of the critical point will exhibit nonmonotonic dependence on control parameters. We focus on observables constructed from the multiplicity and transverse momenta of charged pions. We first consider how the event-by-event fluctuations of such observables are affected by Bose-Einstein correlations, by resonances which decay after freeze-out, and by fluctuations in the transverse flow velocity. We compare our thermodynamic predictions for such noncritical event-by-event fluctuations with NA49 data, finding broad agreement. We then focus on effects due to thermal contact between the observed pions and a heat bath with a given (possibly singular) specific heat, due to the direct coupling between the critical fluctuations of the sigma field and the observed pions. We also discuss the effect of the pions produced in the decay of sigma particles just above threshold after freeze-out on the inclusive pion spectrum and on multiplicity fluctuations. We estimate the size of these nonmonotonic effects, which appear near the critical point, including restrictions imposed by finite size and finite time, and conclude that they should be easily observable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Energy dependence of pion and kaon production in central Pb+Pb collisions
Afanasiev, S. V., Anticic, T., Barna, D., Bartke, J., Barton, R. A., Behler, M., Betev, L., Białkowska, H., Billmeier, A., Blume, C., et al. (2002) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.66.054902 · Cited by 587
ALICE: Physics Performance Report, Volume II
Collaboration, A., Alessandro, B., Antinori, F., Belikov, J. A., Blume, C., Dainese, A., Foka, P., Giubellino, P., Hippolyte, B., Kuhn, C., et al. (2006) · Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/32/10/001 · Cited by 549
Universality, the QCD critical and tricritical point, and the quark number susceptibility
Hatta, Y., & Ikeda, T. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.014028 · Cited by 334
Dynamics of hot bulk QCD matter: From the quark-gluon plasma to hadronic freeze-out
Bass, S. A., & Dumitru, A. (2000) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.61.064909 · Cited by 275
Strongly coupled quark-gluon plasma in heavy ion collisions
Shuryak, E. (2017) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.035001 · Cited by 270
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stephanov, M., Rajagopal, K., & Shuryak, E.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1999-11-10
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2041281433
- Cited by
- 846
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Event-by-event fluctuations in heavy ion collisions and the QCD critical point. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.60.114028
- The paper
- Stephanov, M., Rajagopal, K., & Shuryak, E. (1999). Event-by-event fluctuations in heavy ion collisions and the QCD critical point. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.60.114028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.