The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scalar-tensor gravity and quintessence
Open accessAbstract
Scalar fields with inverse power-law effective potentials may provide a negative pressure component to the energy density of the universe today, as required by cosmological observations. In order to be cosmologically relevant today, the scalar field should have a mass ${m}_{\ensuremath{\varphi}}{=O(10}^{\ensuremath{-}33}\mathrm{eV}),$ thus potentially inducing sizable violations of the equivalence principle and space-time variations of the coupling constants. Scalar-tensor theories of gravity provide a framework for accommodating phenomenologically acceptable ultralight scalar fields. We discuss nonminimally coupled scalar-tensor theories in which the scalar-matter coupling is a dynamical quantity. Two attractor mechanisms are operative at the same time: one towards the tracker solution, which accounts for the accelerated expansion of the Universe, and one towards general relativity, which makes the ultralight scalar field phenomenologically safe today. As in usual tracker-field models, the late-time behavior is largely independent of the initial conditions. Strong distortions in the cosmic microwave background anisotropy spectra as well as in the matter power spectrum are expected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Mach's Principle and a Relativistic Theory of Gravitation
Brans, C., & Dicke, R. H. (1961) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.124.925 · Cited by 5,621
Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field
Ratra, B., & Peebles, P. J. E. (1988) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.3406 · Cited by 4,310
Cosmological scaling solutions of nonminimally coupled scalar fields
Uzan, J.-P. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.123510 · Cited by 468
The Oklo bound on the time variation of the fine-structure constant revisited
Damour, T., & Dyson, F. (1996) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(96)00467-1 · Cited by 374
Direct test of the constancy of fundamental nuclear constants
SHLYAKHTER, A. I. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/264340a0 · Cited by 269
Cited by
Quintessence as a runaway dilaton
Gasperini, M., Piazza, F., & Veneziano, G. (2001) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.023508 · Cited by 449
Cosmological observations in scalar-tensor quintessence
Riazuelo, A., & Uzan, J.-P. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.023525 · Cited by 227
Quintessence and gravitational waves
Riazuelo, A., & Uzan, J.-P. (2000) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.083506 · Cited by 134
Big bang nucleosynthesis constraints on scalar-tensor theories of gravity
Coc, A., Olive, K. A., Uzan, J.-P., & Vangioni, E. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.083525 · Cited by 124
Giannantonio, T., Martinelli, M., Silvestri, A., & Melchiorri, A. (2010) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/04/030 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartolo, N., & Pietroni, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1999-12-29
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2094403770
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 8.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.