The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robustness of quintessence
Open accessAbstract
Recent observations seem to suggest that our Universe is accelerating, implying that it is dominated by a fluid whose equation of state is negative. Quintessence is a possible explanation. In particular, the concept of tracking solutions permits us to address the fine-tuning and coincidence problems. We study this proposal in the simplest case of an inverse power potential and investigate its robustness to corrections. We show that quintessence is not affected by the one-loop quantum corrections. In the supersymmetric case where the quintessential potential is motivated by nonperturbative effects in gauge theories, we consider the curvature effects and the K\"ahler corrections. We find that the curvature effects are negligible while the K\"ahler corrections modify the early evolution of the quintessence field. Finally we study the supergravity corrections and show that they must be taken into account as $Q\ensuremath{\approx}{m}_{\mathrm{Pl}}$ at small redshifts. We discuss simple supergravity models exhibiting the quintessential behavior. In particular, we propose a model where the scalar potential is given by $V(Q)=({\ensuremath{\Lambda}}^{4+\ensuremath{\alpha}}{/Q}^{\ensuremath{\alpha}}{)e}^{(\ensuremath{\kappa}{/2)Q}^{2}}.$ We argue that the fine-tuning problem can be overcome if $\ensuremath{\alpha}>~11.$ This model leads to ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{Q}\ensuremath{\approx}\ensuremath{-}0.82$ for ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{\mathrm{m}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.3$ which is in good agreement with the presently available data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field
Ratra, B., & Peebles, P. J. E. (1988) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.3406 · Cited by 4,310
Cited by
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
Martin, J. (2012) · Comptes Rendus. Physique · doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2012.04.008 · Cited by 913
Self-citationCosmology with tachyon field as dark energy
Bagla, J. S., Jassal, H. K., & Padmanabhan, T. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.063504 · Cited by 554
Cosmological dynamics of a phantom field
Singh, P., Sami, M., & Dadhich, N. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.023522 · Cited by 516
Can the Chaplygin gas be a plausible model for dark energy?
Gorini, V., Kamenshchik, A., & Moschella, U. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.063509 · Cited by 511
Metadata
- Authors
- Brax, P., & Martin, J.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2000-04-13
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2253251016
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robustness of quintessence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.61.103502
- The paper
- Brax, P., & Martin, J. (2000). Robustness of quintessence. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.61.103502
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.