The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conversion of conventional gravitational-wave interferometers into quantum nondemolition interferometers by modifying their input and/or output optics
Open accessAbstract
The LIGO-II gravitational-wave interferometers (ca. 2006--2008) are designed to have sensitivities near the standard quantum limit (SQL) in the vicinity of 100 Hz. This paper describes and analyzes possible designs for subsequent LIGO-III interferometers that can beat the SQL. These designs are identical to a conventional broad band interferometer (without signal recycling), except for new input and/or output optics. Three designs are analyzed: (i) a squeezed-input interferometer (conceived by Unruh based on earlier work of Caves) in which squeezed vacuum with frequency-dependent (FD) squeeze angle is injected into the interferometer's dark port; (ii) a variational-output interferometer (conceived in a different form by Vyatchanin, Matsko and Zubova), in which homodyne detection with FD homodyne phase is performed on the output light; and (iii) a squeezed-variational interferometer with squeezed input and FD-homodyne output. It is shown that the FD squeezed-input light can be produced by sending ordinary squeezed light through two successive Fabry-P\'erot filter cavities before injection into the interferometer, and FD-homodyne detection can be achieved by sending the output light through two filter cavities before ordinary homodyne detection. With anticipated technology (power squeeze factor ${e}^{\ensuremath{-}2R}=0.1$ for input squeezed vacuum and net fractional loss of signal power in arm cavities and output optical train ${\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{*}=0.01)$ and using an input laser power ${I}_{o}$ in units of that required to reach the SQL (the planned LIGO-II power, ${I}_{\mathrm{SQL}}),$ the three types of interferometer could beat the amplitude SQL at 100 Hz by the following amounts $\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\equiv}\sqrt{{S}_{h}}/\sqrt{{S}_{h}^{\mathrm{SQL}}}$ and with the following corresponding increase $\mathcal{V}=1/{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{3}$ in the volume of the universe that can be searched for a given noncosmological source: $\mathrm{Squeezed}\mathrm{input}---\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\simeq}\sqrt{{e}^{\ensuremath{-}2R}}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.3$ and $\mathcal{V}\ensuremath{\simeq}{1/0.3}^{3}\ensuremath{\simeq}30$ using ${I}_{o}{/I}_{\mathrm{SQL}}=1.$ $Variational\ensuremath{-}output---\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\simeq}{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{*}^{1/4}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.3$ and $\mathcal{V}\ensuremath{\simeq}30$ but only if the optics can handle a ten times larger power: ${I}_{o}{/I}_{\mathrm{SQL}}\ensuremath{\simeq}1/\sqrt{{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{*}}=10.$ $\mathrm{Squeezed}\mathrm{varational}---\ensuremath{\mu}{=1.3(e}^{\ensuremath{-}2R}{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{*}{)}^{1/4}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.24$ and $\mathcal{V}\ensuremath{\simeq}80$ using ${I}_{o}{/I}_{\mathrm{SQL}}=1;$ and $\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\simeq}{(e}^{\ensuremath{-}2R}{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{*}{)}^{1/4}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.18$ and $\mathcal{V}\ensuremath{\simeq}180$ using ${I}_{o}{/I}_{\mathrm{SQL}}=\sqrt{{e}^{\ensuremath{-}2R}/{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{*}}\ensuremath{\simeq}3.2.$
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer
Caves, C. M. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.1693 · Cited by 3,202
Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics
Mandel, L., Wolf, E., & Meystre, P. (1996) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.18450 · Cited by 2,414
Caves, C. M., Thorne, K. S., Drever, R. W. P., Sandberg, V. D., & Zimmermann, M. (1980) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.52.341 · Cited by 1,235
Self-citationNew formalism for two-photon quantum optics. I. Quadrature phases and squeezed states
Caves, C. M., & Schumaker, B. L. (1985) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.31.3068 · Cited by 881
Thermal noise in mechanical experiments
Saulson, P. R. (1990) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.42.2437 · Cited by 852
Braginsky, V. B., Khalili, F. Y., & Thorne, K. S. (1992) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622748 · Cited by 820
Self-citationQuantum Nondemolition Measurements
Braginsky, V. B., Vorontsov, Y. I., & Thorne, K. S. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.209.4456.547 · Cited by 794
Self-citationPrecision measurement beyond the shot-noise limit
Xiao, M., Wu, L.-A., & Kimble, H. J. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.278 · Cited by 723
Self-citationNew formalism for two-photon quantum optics. II. Mathematical foundation and compact notation
Schumaker, B. L., & Caves, C. M. (1985) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.31.3093 · Cited by 577
Squeezed-light–enhanced polarization interferometer
Grangier, P., Slusher, R. E., Yurke, B., & LaPorta, A. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2153 · Cited by 493
Cited by
Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light
Aasi, J., Abadie, J., Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.177 · Cited by 1,204
Self-citationQuantum technology: the second quantum revolution
Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2003.1227 · Cited by 1,046
Squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers
Schnabel, R. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.04.001 · Cited by 513
Observation of Radiation Pressure Shot Noise on a Macroscopic Object
Purdy, T. P., Peterson, R. W., & Regal, C. A. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231282 · Cited by 398
Tsang, M. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.063837 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Kimble, H. J., Levin, Y., Matsko, A. B., Thorne, K. S., & Vyatchanin, S. P.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2001-12-26
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2103682879
- Cited by
- 667
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 9.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conversion of conventional gravitational-wave interferometers into quantum nondemolition interferometers by modifying their input and/or output optics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.65.022002
- The paper
- Kimble, H. J., Levin, Y., Matsko, A. B., Thorne, K. S., & Vyatchanin, S. P. (2001). Conversion of conventional gravitational-wave interferometers into quantum nondemolition interferometers by modifying their input and/or output optics. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.65.022002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.