The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of CMB polarization on an incomplete sky
Open accessAbstract
The full sky cosmic microwave background polarization field can be decomposed into ``electric'' and ``magnetic'' components. Working in harmonic space we construct window functions that allow clean separation of the electric and magnetic modes from observations over only a portion of the sky. We explicitly demonstrate the method for azimuthally symmetric patches, but also present it in a form in principle applicable to arbitrarily shaped patches. From the window functions we obtain variables that allow for robust estimation of the magnetic component without risk of contamination from the probably much larger electric signal. The variables have a very simple noise properties, and further analysis using them should be no harder than analyzing the temperature field. For an azimuthally symmetric patch, such as that obtained from survey missions when the galactic region is removed, the exactly separated variables are fast to compute. We estimate the magnetic signal that could be detected by the Planck satellite in the absence of extra-galactic foregrounds. We also discuss the sensitivity of future experiments to tensor modes in the presence of a magnetic signal generated by weak lensing, and give lossless methods for analyzing the electric polarization field in the case that the magnetic component is negligible. A series of Appendixes review the spin weight formalism and give recursion relations for fast computation of the spin-weighted spherical harmonics and their inner products over azimuthally symmetric patches of the sphere. A further Appendix discusses the statistics of weak signal detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Three‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Polarization Analysis
Page, L., Hinshaw, G., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Spergel, D. N., Bennett, C. L., Barnes, C., Bean, R., Dore, O., Dunkley, J., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/513699 · Cited by 1,380
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies
Hu, W., & Dodelson, S. (2002) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093926 · Cited by 745
Vanderlinde, K., Crawford, T. M., de Haan, T., Dudley, J. P., Shaw, L., Ade, P. A. R., Aird, K. A., Benson, B. A., Bleem, L. E., Brodwin, M., et al. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/722/2/1180 · Cited by 326
A critical review of inflation
Turok, N. (2002) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/13/305 · Cited by 58
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Turok, N.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2001-12-19
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W1980684657
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of CMB polarization on an incomplete sky. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.65.023505
- The paper
- Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Turok, N. (2001). Analysis of CMB polarization on an incomplete sky. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.65.023505
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.