The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hadronic light-by-light corrections to the muong−2:The pion-pole contribution
Open accessAbstract
The correction to the muon anomalous magnetic moment from the pion-pole contribution to the hadronic light-by-light scattering is considered using a description of the ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\gamma}}^{*}\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\gamma}}^{*}$ transition form factor based on the large-${N}_{C}$ and short-distance properties of QCD. The resulting two-loop integrals are treated by first performing the angular integration analytically, using the method of Gegenbauer polynomials, followed by a numerical evaluation of the remaining two-dimensional integration over the moduli of the Euclidean loop momenta. The value obtained, ${a}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{\mathrm{LbyL};{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}}=+5.8(1.0)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}10},$ disagrees with other recent calculations. In the case of the vector meson dominance form factor, the result obtained by following the same procedure reads ${a}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{\mathrm{LbyL};{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}}{|}_{\mathrm{VMD}}=+5.6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}10},$ and differs only by its overall sign from the value obtained by previous authors. The inclusion of the $\ensuremath{\eta}$ and ${\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ poles gives a total value ${a}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{\mathrm{L}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{L};\mathrm{P}\mathrm{S}}=+8.3(1.2)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}10}$ for the three pseudoscalar states. This result substantially reduces the difference between the experimental value of ${a}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ and its theoretical counterpart in the standard model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Formulas and Theorems for the Special Functions of Mathematical Physics
Magnus, W., Oberhettinger, F., & Soni, R. P. (1966) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-11761-3 · Cited by 3,469
A PCAC puzzle: π0→γγ in the σ-model
Bell, J. S., & Jackiw, R. (1969) · Il Nuovo Cimento A · doi:10.1007/bf02823296 · Cited by 3,284
New Measurement of the Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Positive Muon
Carey, R. M., Earle, W., Efstathiadis, E., Hare, M. F., Hazen, E. S., Hughes, B. J., Krienen, F., Miller, J. P., Monich, V., Ouyang, J., et al. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.1632 · Cited by 97
Cited by
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 · Cited by 4,979
R-Parity-violating supersymmetry
Barbier, R., Bérat, C., Besançon, M., Chemtob, M., Deandrea, A., Dudas, E., Fayet, P., Lavignac, S., Moreau, G., Perez, E., et al. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.006 · Cited by 1,043
A call for new physics: The muon anomalous magnetic moment and lepton flavor violation
Lindner, M., Platscher, M., & Queiroz, F. S. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.001 · Cited by 503
Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: pion pole
Hoferichter, M., Hoid, B.-L., Kubis, B., Leupold, S., & Schneider, S. P. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2018)141 · Cited by 428
Gilberto Colangelo, A., Hagelstein, F., Hoferichter, M., Laub, L., & Stoffer, P. (2020) · doi:10.1007/jhep03%282020%29101 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Knecht, M., & Nyffeler, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2002-04-05
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2100644129
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.