CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 39

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nested braneworlds and strong brane gravity

Gregory, Ruth, Padilla, Antonio·2002·Physical Review D
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.65.084013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.65.084013

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The physical process of vacuum decay with an inhomogeneity can be represented gravitationally by a Euclidean solution with two Schwarzschild bulks with different cosmological constants separated by a thin wall with constant tension.

    “The physical process of vacuum decay with an inhomogeneity can be represented gravitationally by a Euclidean solution with two 'Schwarzschild' bulks which have different cosmological constants separated by a thin wall with constant tension (for a general proof of this result in the context of braneworlds, see [45,46]).”

    From Vacuum metastability with black holes (2015) · cites this paper as [46]

    In the passage giving the general bulk metric (section labeled Abstract, page unavailable), the paper describes a brane boundary joining bulk regions and notes that one metric case is analogous to a Euclidean black hole. Its closing discussion says the approach could be modified to join spacetimes with different cosmological constants. It does not establish the claimed Euclidean representation of inhomogeneous vacuum decay; the solution it develops assumes reflection symmetry and a vanishing bulk integration constant. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The equations of motion have the same schematic form as (2.6) but with σ = 4πGσ/(D-2) and f the higher dimensional Schwarzschild potential.

    “The equations of motion have the same schematic form as (2.6)”

    From Vacuum metastability with black holes (2015) · cites this paper as [46]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. V.A. Rubakov, 1983, Phys. Lett., 125B, 136, 10.1016/0370-2693(83)91253-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. K. Akama, 1982, Lect. Notes Phys., 176, 267, 10.1007/3-540-11994-9_41 · DOI
  3. N. Arkani-Hamed, 1998, Phys. Lett. B, 429, 263, 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00466-3 · DOI · Paper page
  4. I. Antoniadis, 1998, Phys. Lett. B, 257, 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00860-0 · DOI · Paper page
  5. L. Randall, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 3370, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3370 · DOI · Paper page
  6. L. Randall, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 4690, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4690 · DOI · Paper page
  7. A. Lukas, 1999, Phys. Rev. D, 59, 086001, 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.086001 · DOI · Paper page
  8. G. Shiu, 1998, Phys. Rev. D, 106007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.106007 · DOI
  9. A. Lukas, 1999, Phys. Rev. D, 086001
  10. R. Sundrum, 1999, Phys. Rev. D, 59, 085010, 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.085010 · DOI
  11. G. Gibbons, 2001, J. High Energy Phys., 01, 022, 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/01/022 · DOI
  12. C. Charmousis, 2001, J. High Energy Phys., 026, 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/05/026 · DOI
  13. J. Garriga, 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 2778, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2778 · DOI · Paper page
  14. S.B. Giddings, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 03, 023, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/03/023 · DOI
  15. P. Binetruy, 2000, Nucl. Phys., B565, 269, 10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00696-3 · DOI
  16. C. Csaki, 1999, Phys. Lett. B, 462, 34, 10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00896-5 · DOI
  17. J.M. Cline, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 4245, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4245 · DOI
  18. H.A. Chamblin, 1999, Nucl. Phys., B562, 133, 10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00520-9 · DOI
  19. N. Kaloper, 1999, Phys. Rev. D, 60, 123506, 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.123506 · DOI
  20. P. Kraus, 1999, J. High Energy Phys., 12, 011, 10.1088/1126-6708/1999/12/011 · DOI
  21. P. Bowcock, 2000, Class. Quantum Grav., 17, 4745, 10.1088/0264-9381/17/22/313 · DOI · Paper page
  22. A. Chamblin, 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 61, 065007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.065007 · DOI · Paper page
  23. A. Chamblin, 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 1090, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1090 · DOI
  24. R. Gregory, 2000, Class. Quantum Grav., 17, L125, 10.1088/0264-9381/17/18/103 · DOI · Paper page
  25. R. Emparan, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 01, 007, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/007 · DOI · Paper page
  26. S.C. Davis, 2001, Phys. Lett. B, 499, 179, 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00020-X · DOI
  27. M. Gremm, 2000, Phys. Lett. B, 478, 434, 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00303-8 · DOI
  28. J.R. Morris, 1998, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 13, 1115, 10.1142/S0217751X98000494 · DOI
  29. J.R. Morris, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 51, 697, 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.697 · DOI
  30. U. Gen, 2001, Prog. Theor. Phys., 105, 591, 10.1143/PTP.105.591 · DOI
  31. I.I. Kogan, 2001, Phys. Lett. B, 501, 140, 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00096-X · DOI
  32. A. Karch, 2001, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 16, 780, 10.1142/S0217751X01003901 · DOI
  33. M.D. Schwartz, 2001, Phys. Lett. B, 502, 223, 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00152-6 · DOI
  34. G.W. Gibbons, 1993, Nucl. Phys., B394, 3, 10.1016/0550-3213(93)90099-B · DOI
  35. M. Cvetič, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 48, 2613, 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.2613 · DOI
  36. A. Vilenkin, 1981, Phys. Rev. D, 23, 852, 10.1103/PhysRevD.23.852 · DOI
  37. J. Ipser, 1984, Phys. Rev. D, 712, 10.1103/PhysRevD.30.712 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gregory, R., & Padilla, A.
Venue
Physical Review D
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2002-03-25
Volume
65
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 0556-2821
  • 1089-4918
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.65.084013
Cited by
39
References
1
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review