CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

General brane cosmologies and their global spacetime structure

Bowcock, Peter, Charmousis, Christos, Gregory, Ruth·2000·Classical and Quantum Gravity
DOI 10.1088/0264-9381/17/22/313
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/17/22/313

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The physical process of vacuum decay with an inhomogeneity can be represented gravitationally by a Euclidean solution with two Schwarzschild bulks with different cosmological constants separated by a thin wall with constant tension.

    “The physical process of vacuum decay with an inhomogeneity can be represented gravitationally by a Euclidean solution with two 'Schwarzschild' bulks which have different cosmological constants separated by a thin wall with constant tension (for a general proof of this result in the context of braneworlds, see [45,46]).”

    From Vacuum metastability with black holes (2015) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Discussion describes cosmological brane solutions joining two Schwarzschild-AdS spacetimes, and Section IV discusses domain walls between bulk regions. But the cited paper does not establish the claimed Euclidean solution for vacuum decay with an inhomogeneity; its result concerns homogeneous and isotropic brane cosmologies. Searches for “Euclidean” and “vacuum decay” found no passage addressing that process. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3370 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4690 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/0370-2693(83)91253-4 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/0370-2693(85)90112-1 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0370-2693(86)90347-3 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01331-3 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2564 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.240 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.044014 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0550-3213(96)00308-2 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.086001 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.086001 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.103506 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2778 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Giddings S, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 023, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/03/023 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00696-3 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00204-5 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.123506 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.023511 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00896-5 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4245 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.024012 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.084023 · DOI
  24. Ida D, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 014, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/09/014 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.024028 · DOI
  26. Kraus P, 1999, J. High Energy Phys., 1999, 011, 10.1088/1126-6708/1999/12/011 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00520-9 · DOI
  28. Chamblin H A, 1999, J. High Energy Phys., 1999, 014, 10.1088/1126-6708/1999/09/014 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.043501 · DOI
  30. Lykken J, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 014, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/06/014 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevD.30.712 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00241-8 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5928 · DOI
  34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5932 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00631-6 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00435-4 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00554-2 · DOI
  38. Pilo L, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 056, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/07/056 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01218-6 · DOI
  40. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.044039 · DOI
  41. Csaki C, 2000, Phys. Rev., 62, 045015, 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.045015 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00520-7 · DOI
  43. Taub A H, 1951, Ann. Math., 53, 472, 10.2307/1969567 · DOI
  44. Israel W, 1966, Nuovo Cimento, 44, 1, 10.1007/BF02710419 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Cvetic M, 2000, Phys. Rev., 61, 124020, 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.124020 · DOI
  46. Gogberashvili M, 2000, Europhys. Lett., 49, 396, 10.1209/epl/i2000-00162-1 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00538-4 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/0550-3213(93)90099-B · DOI
  49. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.670 · DOI
  50. Cvetic M, 1993, Phys. Rev., 48, 2613, 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.2613 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/0370-2693(83)90554-3 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Lykken J, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 009, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/09/009 · DOI
  53. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4922 · DOI
  54. Choudhury D, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 021, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/09/021 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00740-1 · DOI
  56. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.067505 · DOI
  57. 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.065007 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Emparan R, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 007, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/007 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Emparan R, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 021, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/021 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.044012 · DOI
  61. 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.3446 · DOI
  62. 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.124016 · DOI
  63. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.083504 · DOI
  64. 10.1103/PhysRevD.41.3038 · DOI
  65. 10.1103/PhysRevD.41.3869 · DOI
  66. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.084015 · DOI
  67. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.064022 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bowcock, P., Charmousis, C., & Gregory, R.
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Published
2000-10-31
Volume
17
Issue
22
Pages
4745-4763
ISSN
  • 0264-9381
  • 1361-6382
DOI
10.1088/0264-9381/17/22/313
Cited by
276
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review