Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 708

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gravitational lensing by naked singularities

Virbhadra, K. S., Ellis, G. F. R.·2002·Physical Review D

Abstract

We model massive dark objects in galactic nuclei as spherically symmetric static naked singularities in the Einstein massless scalar field theory and study the resulting gravitational lensing in detail. Based on whether or not a naked singularity is covered within a photon sphere we classify naked singularities into two kinds: weakly naked (those contained within at least one photon sphere) and strongly naked (those not contained within any photon sphere). The qualitative features of gravitational lensing due to a weakly naked singularity are similar to those due to a Schwarzschild black hole (these give rise to one Einstein ring but no radial critical curve). However, the gravitational lensing due to a strongly naked singularity is qualitatively different from that due to a Schwarzschild black hole; a strongly naked singularity gives rise to either two or nil Einstein ring(s) and one radial critical curve. A light ray passing close to a photon sphere of a black hole or a weakly naked singularity goes around its photon sphere once, twice, or many times (before reaching an observer) depending upon the impact parameter and thus gives rise to a sequence of theoretically infinite number of relativistic images, which are highly demagnified. A strongly naked singularity produces no relativistic images.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.65.103004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. R. Penrose, 1969, Riv. Nuovo Cimento, 1, 252
  2. K.S. Virbhadra, 1999, Phys. Rev. D, 60, 104041, 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.104041 · DOI · Paper page
  3. I. Zehavi, 1999, Nature (London), 401, 252, 10.1038/45748 · DOI
  4. L. Wang, 2000, Astrophys. J., 530, 17, 10.1086/308331 · DOI · Paper page
  5. K.S. Virbhadra, 1998, Astron. Astrophys., 337, 1
  6. K.S. Virbhadra, 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 62, 084003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.084003 · DOI · Paper page
  7. S. Frittelli, 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 61, 064021, 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.064021 · DOI · Paper page
  8. C.-M. Claudel, 2001, J. Math. Phys., 42, 818, 10.1063/1.1308507 · DOI · Paper page
  9. K.S. Virbhadra, 1997, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 12, 4831, 10.1142/S0217751X97002577 · DOI · Paper page
  10. A.I. Janis, 1968, Phys. Rev. Lett., 20, 878, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.20.878 · DOI · Paper page
  11. M. Wyman, 1981, Phys. Rev. D, 24, 839, 10.1103/PhysRevD.24.839 · DOI · Paper page
  12. K.S. Virbhadra, 1997, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 6, 357, 10.1142/S0218271897000200 · doi:10.1142/s0218271897000200
  13. D. Richstone, 1998, Nature (London), 395, A14
  14. K.P. Rauch, 1994, Astrophys. J., 421, 46, 10.1086/173625 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 708

Metadata

Authors
Virbhadra, K. S., & Ellis, G. F. R.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2002-05-10
Volume
65
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2031368321
Cited by
708
References
2
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gravitational lensing by naked singularities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.65.103004
The paper
Virbhadra, K. S., & Ellis, G. F. R. (2002). Gravitational lensing by naked singularities. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.65.103004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.