Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Getting the most from the statistical analysis of solar neutrino oscillations

Open access
Fogli, G. L., Lisi, E., Marrone, A., Montanino, D., Palazzo, A.·2002·Physical Review D

Abstract

We present a thorough analysis of the current solar neutrino data, in the context of two-flavor active neutrino oscillations. We aim at performing an accurate and exhaustive statistical treatment of both the input and the output information. Concerning the input information, we analyze 81 observables, including the total event rate from the chlorine experiment, the total gallium event rate and its winter-summer difference, the 44 bins of the Super-Kamiokande (SK) energy-nadir electron spectrum, and the 34 day-night energy spectrum bins from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) experiment. We carefully evaluate and propagate the effects of 31 sources of correlated systematic uncertainties, including 12 standard solar model (SSM) input errors, the ${}^{8}\mathrm{B}$ neutrino energy spectrum uncertainty, as well as 11 and 7 systematics in SK and SNO, respectively. Concerning the output information, we express the ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{2}$ analysis results in terms of ``pulls,'' embedding the single contributions to the total ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{2}$ coming from both the observables and the systematics. It is shown that the pull method, as compared to the (numerically equivalent) covariance matrix approach, is not only simpler and more advantageous, but also includes useful indications about the preferred variations of the neutrino fluxes with respect to their SSM predictions. Our final results confirm the current best-fit solution at large mixing angle (LMA), but also allow, with acceptable statistical significance, other solutions in the low-mass (LOW) or in the quasivacuum oscillation (QVO) regime. Concerning the LMA solution, our analysis provides conservative bounds on the oscillation parameters, and shows that the contribution of correlated systematics to the total ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{2}$ is rather modest. In addition, within the LMA solution, the allowed variations from SSM neutrino fluxes are presented in detail. Concerning the LOW and QVO solutions, the analysis of the pull distributions clearly shows that they are still statistically acceptable, while the small mixing angle (SMA) solution could be recovered only by ad hoc ``recalibrations'' of several SSM and experimental systematics. A series of Appendixes elucidate various topics related to the ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{2}$ statistics, the winter-summer difference in GALLEX-GNO, the treatment of the SK and SNO spectra, and a quasi-model-independent comparison of the SK and SNO total rates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.66.053010

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 341

Metadata

Authors
Fogli, G. L., Lisi, E., Marrone, A., Montanino, D., & Palazzo, A.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2002-09-30
Volume
66
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2101654452
Cited by
341
References
2
FWCI
15.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Getting the most from the statistical analysis of solar neutrino oscillations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.66.053010
The paper
Fogli, G. L., Lisi, E., Marrone, A., Montanino, D., & Palazzo, A. (2002). Getting the most from the statistical analysis of solar neutrino oscillations. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.66.053010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.