Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles
Open accessAbstract
A particle mixture theory of neutrino is proposed assuming the existence of two kinds of neutrinos. Based on the neutrino-mixture theory, a possible unified model of elementary particles is constructed by generalizing the Sakata-Nagoya model. Our scheme gives a natural explanation of smallness of leptonic decay rate of hyperons as well as the subtle difference of Gν's between µ-e and β-decay. Starting with this scheme, the possibility of Ke3 mode with ΔS/ΔQ = −1 is also examined, and some bearings on the dynamical role of the B-matter, a fundamental constituent of baryons in the Nagoya model, are clarified.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SciCode includes research problems built upon or reproducing methods used in Nobel Prize-winning studies.
“We also include several research problems that are built upon or reproduce methods used in Nobel Prize-winning studies to highlight current trends in scientific research: the self-consistent field (SCF) method for density functional theory (DFT) calculations [37] (The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1998) , the PMNS matrix for neutrino oscillation in matter [54, 61] (The Nobel Prize in Physics 2015) ,”
From SciCode: A Research Coding Benchmark Curated by Scientists (2024) · cites this paper as [54]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Three flavor neutrino oscillations in matter
Ohlsson, T., & Snellman, H. (2000) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.533270 · Cited by 118
Neutrino oscillations in discrete-time quantum walk framework
Mallick, A., Mandal, S., & Chandrashekar, C. M. (2017) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4636-9 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
SciCode: A Research Coding Benchmark Curated by Scientists
Tian, M., Gao, L., Zhang, S. D., Chen, X., Fan, C., Guo, X., Haas, R., Ji, P., Krongchon, K., Li, Y., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.13168 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“…for density functional theory (DFT) calculations [37] (The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1998) , the PMNS matrix for neutrino oscillation in matter [54, 61] (The Nobel Prize in Physics 2015) , the Haldane model for the anomalous quantum Hall effect [26] (The Nobel Prize in Physics 2016) , optical…”
Background
- Authors
- Maki, Z., Nakagawa, M., & Sakata, S.
- Affiliations
- Nagoya University (JP)
- Venue
- Progress of Theoretical Physics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1962-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 870-880
- ISSN
- 0033-068X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059777410
- Cited by
- 3,355
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 94 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 136 · 2023: 145 · 2022: 143 · 2021: 144 · 2020: 177 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 115 · 2017: 133 · 2016: 157 · 2015: 149 · 2014: 139 · 2013: 147 · 2012: 137
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Progress of Theoretical Physics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Neutrino Physics Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
- Keywords
- beta decay
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review