Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Supersymmetric regularization, two-loop QCD amplitudes, and coupling shifts

Open access
Bern, Z., De Freitas, A., Dixon, L., Wong, H. L.·2002·Physical Review D

Abstract

We present a definition of the four-dimensional helicity (FDH) regularization scheme valid for two or more loops. This scheme was previously defined and utilized at one loop. It amounts to a variation on the standard 't Hooft--Veltman scheme and is designed to be compatible with the use of helicity states for ``observed'' particles. It is similar to dimensional reduction in that it maintains an equal number of bosonic and fermionic states, as required for preserving supersymmetry. Supersymmetry Ward identities relate different helicity amplitudes in supersymmetric theories. As a check that the FDH scheme preserves supersymmetry, at least through two loops, we explicitly verify a number of these identities for gluon-gluon scattering $(g\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{g}gg)$ in supersymmetric QCD. These results also cross-check recent nontrivial two-loop calculations in ordinary QCD. Finally, we compute the two-loop shift between the FDH coupling and the standard modified minimal subtraction $(\overline{\mathrm{MS}})$ scheme coupling, ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{s}.$ The FDH shift is identical to the one for dimensional reduction. The two-loop coupling shifts are then used to obtain the three-loop QCD $\ensuremath{\beta}$ function in the FDH and dimensional reduction schemes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.66.085002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Bern, Z., De Freitas, A., Dixon, L., & Wong, H. L.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2002-10-10
Volume
66
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2174087526
Cited by
202
References
1
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.