Cited by 1,765Relativity and Gravitational TheoryNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Quantum Theory of Gravity. II. The Manifestly Covariant Theory

DeWitt, Bryce S.·1967·Physical Review

Abstract

Contrary to the situation which holds for the canonical theory described in the first paper of this series, there exists at present no tractable pure operator language on which to base a manifestly covariant quantum theory of gravity. One must construct the theory by analogy with conventional $S$-matrix theory, using the $c$-number language of Feynman amplitudes when nothing else is available. The present paper undertakes this construction. It begins at an elementary level with a treatment of the propagation of small disturbances on a classical background. The classical background plays a fundamental role throughout, both as a technical instrument for probing the vacuum (i.e., analyzing virtual processes) and as an arbitrary fiducial point for the quantum fluctuations. The problem of the quantized light cone is discussed in a preliminary way, and the formal structure of the invariance group is displayed. A condensed notation is adopted which permits the Yang-Mills field to be studied simultaneously with the gravitational field. Generally covariant Green's functions are introduced through the imposition of covariant supplementary conditions on small disturbances. The transition from the classical to the quantum theory is made via the Poisson bracket of Peierls. Commutation relations for the asymptotic fields are obtained and used to define the incoming and outgoing states. Because of the non-Abelian character of the coordinate transformation group, the separation of propagated disturbances into physical and nonphysical components requires much greater care than in electrodynamics. With the aid of a canonical form for the commutator function, two distinct Feynman propagators relative to an arbitrary background are defined. One of these is manifestly covariant, but propagates nonphysical as well as physical quanta; the other propagates physical quanta only, but lacks manifest covariance. The latter is used to define external-line wave functions and non-radiatively-corrected amplitudes for scattering, pair production, and pair annihilation by the background field. The group invariance of these amplitudes is proved. A fully covariant generalization of the complete $S$ matrix is next proposed, and Feynman's tree theorem on the group invariance of non-radiatively-corrected $n$-particle amplitudes is derived. The big problem of radiative corrections is then confronted. The resolution of this problem is carried out in steps. The single-loop contribution to the vacuum-to-vacuum amplitude is first computed with the aid of the formal theory of continuous determinants. This contribution is then functionally differentiated to obtain the lowest-order radiative corrections to the $n$-quantum amplitudes. These amplitudes split automatically into Feynman baskets, i.e., sums over tree amplitudes (bare scattering amplitudes) in which all external lines are on the mass shell. This guarantees their group invariance. The invariance can be made partially manifest by converting from the noncovariant Feynman propagator to the covariant one, and this leads to the formal appearance of fictitious quanta which compensate the nonphysical modes carried by the covariant propagator. Although avoidable in principle, these quanta necessarily appear whenever manifestly covariant expressions are employed, e.g., in renormalization theory. The fictitious quanta, however, appear only in closed loops and are coupled to real quanta through vertices which vanish when the invariance group is Abelian. The vertices are nonsymmetric and always occur with a uniform orientation around any fictitious quantum loop. The problem of splitting radiative corrections into Feynman baskets becomes more difficult in higher orders, when overlapping loops occur. This problem is approached with the aid of the Feynman functional integral. It is shown that the "measure" or "volume element" for the functional integration plays a fundamental role in the decomposition into Feynman baskets and in guaranteeing the invariance of radiative corrections under arbitrary changes in the choice of basic field variables. The "measure" has two effects. Firstly, it removes from all closed loops the non-causal chains of cyclically connected advanced (or retarded) Green's functions, thereby breaking them open and ensuring that at least one segment of every loop is on the mass shell. Secondly it adds certain nonlocal corrections to the operator field equations, which vanish in the classical limit $\ensuremath{\hbar}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$. The question arises why these removals and corrections are always neglected in conventional field theory without apparent harm. It is argued that the usual procedures of renormalization theory automatically take care of them. In practice the criteria of locality and unitarity are replaced by analyticity statements and Cutkosky rules. It is virtually certain that the "measure" may be similarly ignored (set equal to unity) in gravity theory, and that att

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.162.1195

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The canonical constraints of general relativity can be put into polynomial form by a complex canonical transformation on the gravitational phase space.

    “The celebrated observation due to Ashtekar [4] is that the canonical constraints of general relativity can indeed be cast into polynomial form if one performs a certain complex canonical transformation on the gravitational phase space.”

    From Quantum spin dynamics (QSD) (1998) · cites this paper as [4]

  • The new Hamiltonian constraint carries density weight two.

    “what is worse is that the new Hamiltonian constraint carries density weight two.”
  • Ashtekar connection variables for Lorentzian gravity are complex valued and are subject to algebraically highly complicated reality conditions, difficult to impose at the quantum level.

    “There are two, a priori, problems with these Ashtekar connection variables for Lorentzian gravity : 1) they are complex valued and are therefore subject to algebraically highly complicated reality conditions, difficult to impose on the quantum level, which make sure that we are still dealing with real general relativity”
  • The Hamiltonian constraint in Ashtekar variables is polynomial only after rescaling it by a non-polynomial function, a power of the square root of the determinant of the three-dimensional metric, so the original Wheeler-DeWitt constraint is altered.

    “2) the Hamiltonian constraint is polynomial only after rescaling it by a non-polynomial function, namely a power of the square root of the determinant of the three-dimensional metric, that is, the original Wheeler-DeWitt constraint has actually been altered.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeWitt, B. S.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
DeWitt, Bryce S.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1967-10-25
Volume
162
Issue
5
Pages
1195-1239
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016939318
Cited by
1,765
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 29
FWCI
13.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
quantum gravity, manifest covariance, Feynman propagator, commutation relations, Yang-Mills fields, group invariance, scattering matrix, radiative corrections, pair production, pair annihilation, virtual processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review