Quantum Theory of Gravity. II. The Manifestly Covariant Theory
Abstract
Contrary to the situation which holds for the canonical theory described in the first paper of this series, there exists at present no tractable pure operator language on which to base a manifestly covariant quantum theory of gravity. One must construct the theory by analogy with conventional $S$-matrix theory, using the $c$-number language of Feynman amplitudes when nothing else is available. The present paper undertakes this construction. It begins at an elementary level with a treatment of the propagation of small disturbances on a classical background. The classical background plays a fundamental role throughout, both as a technical instrument for probing the vacuum (i.e., analyzing virtual processes) and as an arbitrary fiducial point for the quantum fluctuations. The problem of the quantized light cone is discussed in a preliminary way, and the formal structure of the invariance group is displayed. A condensed notation is adopted which permits the Yang-Mills field to be studied simultaneously with the gravitational field. Generally covariant Green's functions are introduced through the imposition of covariant supplementary conditions on small disturbances. The transition from the classical to the quantum theory is made via the Poisson bracket of Peierls. Commutation relations for the asymptotic fields are obtained and used to define the incoming and outgoing states. Because of the non-Abelian character of the coordinate transformation group, the separation of propagated disturbances into physical and nonphysical components requires much greater care than in electrodynamics. With the aid of a canonical form for the commutator function, two distinct Feynman propagators relative to an arbitrary background are defined. One of these is manifestly covariant, but propagates nonphysical as well as physical quanta; the other propagates physical quanta only, but lacks manifest covariance. The latter is used to define external-line wave functions and non-radiatively-corrected amplitudes for scattering, pair production, and pair annihilation by the background field. The group invariance of these amplitudes is proved. A fully covariant generalization of the complete $S$ matrix is next proposed, and Feynman's tree theorem on the group invariance of non-radiatively-corrected $n$-particle amplitudes is derived. The big problem of radiative corrections is then confronted. The resolution of this problem is carried out in steps. The single-loop contribution to the vacuum-to-vacuum amplitude is first computed with the aid of the formal theory of continuous determinants. This contribution is then functionally differentiated to obtain the lowest-order radiative corrections to the $n$-quantum amplitudes. These amplitudes split automatically into Feynman baskets, i.e., sums over tree amplitudes (bare scattering amplitudes) in which all external lines are on the mass shell. This guarantees their group invariance. The invariance can be made partially manifest by converting from the noncovariant Feynman propagator to the covariant one, and this leads to the formal appearance of fictitious quanta which compensate the nonphysical modes carried by the covariant propagator. Although avoidable in principle, these quanta necessarily appear whenever manifestly covariant expressions are employed, e.g., in renormalization theory. The fictitious quanta, however, appear only in closed loops and are coupled to real quanta through vertices which vanish when the invariance group is Abelian. The vertices are nonsymmetric and always occur with a uniform orientation around any fictitious quantum loop. The problem of splitting radiative corrections into Feynman baskets becomes more difficult in higher orders, when overlapping loops occur. This problem is approached with the aid of the Feynman functional integral. It is shown that the "measure" or "volume element" for the functional integration plays a fundamental role in the decomposition into Feynman baskets and in guaranteeing the invariance of radiative corrections under arbitrary changes in the choice of basic field variables. The "measure" has two effects. Firstly, it removes from all closed loops the non-causal chains of cyclically connected advanced (or retarded) Green's functions, thereby breaking them open and ensuring that at least one segment of every loop is on the mass shell. Secondly it adds certain nonlocal corrections to the operator field equations, which vanish in the classical limit $\ensuremath{\hbar}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$. The question arises why these removals and corrections are always neglected in conventional field theory without apparent harm. It is argued that the usual procedures of renormalization theory automatically take care of them. In practice the criteria of locality and unitarity are replaced by analyticity statements and Cutkosky rules. It is virtually certain that the "measure" may be similarly ignored (set equal to unity) in gravity theory, and that att
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The canonical constraints of general relativity can be put into polynomial form by a complex canonical transformation on the gravitational phase space.
“The celebrated observation due to Ashtekar [4] is that the canonical constraints of general relativity can indeed be cast into polynomial form if one performs a certain complex canonical transformation on the gravitational phase space.”
From Quantum spin dynamics (QSD) (1998) · cites this paper as [4]
The new Hamiltonian constraint carries density weight two.
“what is worse is that the new Hamiltonian constraint carries density weight two.”
From Anomaly-free formulation of non-perturbative, four-dimensional Lorentzian quantum gravity (1996) · cites this paper as [3]
Ashtekar connection variables for Lorentzian gravity are complex valued and are subject to algebraically highly complicated reality conditions, difficult to impose at the quantum level.
“There are two, a priori, problems with these Ashtekar connection variables for Lorentzian gravity : 1) they are complex valued and are therefore subject to algebraically highly complicated reality conditions, difficult to impose on the quantum level, which make sure that we are still dealing with real general relativity”
From Anomaly-free formulation of non-perturbative, four-dimensional Lorentzian quantum gravity (1996) · cites this paper as [3]
The Hamiltonian constraint in Ashtekar variables is polynomial only after rescaling it by a non-polynomial function, a power of the square root of the determinant of the three-dimensional metric, so the original Wheeler-DeWitt constraint is altered.
“2) the Hamiltonian constraint is polynomial only after rescaling it by a non-polynomial function, namely a power of the square root of the determinant of the three-dimensional metric, that is, the original Wheeler-DeWitt constraint has actually been altered.”
From Anomaly-free formulation of non-perturbative, four-dimensional Lorentzian quantum gravity (1996) · cites this paper as [3]
Cites
Quantum Theory of Gravity. I. The Canonical Theory
DeWitt, B. S. (1967) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.160.1113 · Cited by 3,385 · see citing works
Self-citationConservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance
Yang, C., & Mills, R. L. (1954) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.96.191 · Cited by 3,273 · see citing works
Dynamical Theory of Groups and Fields
DeWitt, B. S., & Mullin, A. A. (1966) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1953053 · Cited by 1,634 · see citing works
Self-citationFeynman, R. P. (1949) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.76.749 · Cited by 1,306 · see citing works
Singularities and Discontinuities of Feynman Amplitudes
Cutkosky, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1703676 · Cited by 1,198 · see citing works
Relativity, groups and topology
L.R. (1965) · Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/0029-5582(65)90020-9 · Cited by 1,053 · see citing works
On the Green’s functions of quantized fields. I
Schwinger, J. (1951) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.37.7.452 · Cited by 994 · see citing works
Photons and Gravitons in Perturbation Theory: Derivation of Maxwell's and Einstein's Equations
Weinberg, S. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.138.b988 · Cited by 650 · see citing works
The Theory of Space, Time and Gravitation
Wyllie, G. (1960) · Physics Bulletin · doi:10.1088/0031-9112/11/8/004 · Cited by 585 · see citing works
On the positive definite mass of the Bondi-Weber-Wheeler time-symmetric gravitational waves
Brill, D. R. (1959) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(59)90055-7 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
The commutation laws of relativistic field theory
Peierls, R. E. (1952) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1952.0158 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Gravitational Field: Equivalence of Feynman Quantization and Canonical Quantization
Leutwyler, H. (1964) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.134.b1155 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Quantization of the gravitational field
Mandelstam, S. (1962) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(62)90233-6 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Theory of Radiative Corrections for Non-Abelian Gauge Fields
DeWitt, B. S. (1964) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.12.742 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationPolynomial expansion of gravitational lagrangian
Peres, A. (1963) · Il Nuovo Cimento · doi:10.1007/bf02828915 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
EXTERIOR ALGEBRA AND THE ACTION PRINCIPLE, I
Schwinger, J. (1962) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.48.4.603 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections
Donoghue, J. F. (1994) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.50.3874 · Cited by 1,294 · see citing works
Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity
Reuter, M. (1998) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.57.971 · Cited by 1,160 · see citing works
Quantum Theory of Gravity. III. Applications of the Covariant Theory
DeWitt, B. S. (1967) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.162.1239 · Cited by 980 · see citing works
Self-citationMisner, C. W. (1969) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.186.1319 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
Goroff, M. H., Sagnotti, A., & Sagnotti, A. (1985) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91470-4 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Fischetti, M. V., Hartle, J. B., & Hu, B. L. (1979) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.20.1757 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Quantized gravitational wave perturbations in Robertson–Walker universes
Ford, L. H., & Parker, L. (1977) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.16.1601 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
A measure of de Sitter entropy and eternal inflation
Arkani-Hamed, N., Dubovsky, S., Nicolis, A., Trincherini, E., & Villadoro, G. (2007) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/05/055 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
A length operator for canonical quantum gravity
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.532445 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Convexity, gauge-dependence and tunneling rates
Plascencia, A. D., & Tamarit, C. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2016)099 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Bianchi I model as a prototype for a cyclical Universe
Montani, G., Marchi, A., & Moriconi, R. (2018) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.12.016 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Solutions to the Wheeler DeWitt constraint of canonical gravity coupled to scalar matter fields
Matschull, H. J. (1993) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/10/9/007 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- DeWitt, B. S.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- DeWitt, Bryce S.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1967-10-25
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1195-1239
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016939318
- Cited by
- 1,765
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 13.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- quantum gravity, manifest covariance, Feynman propagator, commutation relations, Yang-Mills fields, group invariance, scattering matrix, radiative corrections, pair production, pair annihilation, virtual processes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review