Cited by 782Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Primordial density perturbation in the curvaton scenario

Open access
Lyth, David H., Ungarelli, Carlo, Wands, David·2003·Physical Review D

Abstract

We analyze the primordial density perturbation when it is generated by a ``curvaton'' field different from the inflaton. In some cases this perturbation may have large isocurvature components, fully correlated or anticorrelated with the adiabatic component. It may also have a significant non-Gaussian component. All of these effects are calculated in a form which will enable direct comparison with current and forthcoming observational data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.67.023503

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-adiabatic perturbations produced during multi-field inflation can generate detectable non-Gaussianity in the density field after inflation, in models such as the curvaton scenario or reheating.

    “Furthermore, non-adiabatic perturbations produced during multi-field inflation can certainly generate detectable non-Gaussianity in the density field after inflation, in models such as the curvaton scenario [10] (see also [11]) or reheating [12, 13, 14, 15].”

    From Non-Gaussianities in two-field inflation (2006) · cites this paper as [10]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [27]E. Komatsu, B. D. Wandelt, D. N. Spergel, A. J. Banday and K. M. Gorski, Astrophys. J. 566 (2002) 19 [arXiv:astro-ph/0107605]. M. G. Santos et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 241302 [arXiv:astro-ph/0107588]. http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/ http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/ · arXiv
  2. [30]C. Gordon, D. Wands, B. A. Bassett and R. Maartens, Phys. Rev. D 63 , 023506 (2001) [arXiv:astro-ph/0009131]. · arXiv
  3. [32]D. H. Lyth, D. Roberts & M. Smith, Phys. Rev. D 57 , 7120 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9609441]. · arXiv
  4. [33]D. J. Chung, E. W. Kolb and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. D 59 , 023501 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9802238]. · arXiv
  5. [34]L. Randall, M. Soljacic and A. H. Guth, Nucl. Phys. B 472 , 377 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9512439]. · arXiv
  6. [35]J. Garcia-Bellido, A. D. Linde and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D 54 , 6040 (1996) [arXiv:astro-ph/9605094]. · arXiv
  7. [36]L. Hui and E. D. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 60 , 023518 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9812345]; G. R. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 459 , 489 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9905204]; M. BasteroGil, E. J. Copeland, J. Gray, A. Lukas and M. Plumacher, arXiv:hep-th/0201040; · arXiv
  8. [38]K. Hamaguchi, H. Murayama and T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D 65 , 043512 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0109030]. · arXiv
  9. [39]M. Bucher, K. Moodley and N. Turok, Phys. Rev. D 62 , 083508 (2000) [arXiv:astro-ph/9904231]. · arXiv
  10. [40]A. D. Dolgov, arXiv:hep-ph/0202122; G. G. Raffelt, arXiv:astro-ph/0207220; K. N. Abazajian, J. F. Beacom and N. F. Bell, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 013008 [arXiv:astro-ph/0203442]; Y. Y. Wong, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 025015 [arXiv:hep-ph/0203180]. · arXiv
  11. [41]A. D. Dolgov, S. H. Hansen, S. Pastor, S. T. Petcov, G. G. Raffelt and D. V. Semikoz, Nucl. Phys. B 632 (2002) 363 [arXiv:hep-ph/0201287]. · arXiv
  12. [42]M. Orito, T. Kajino, G. J. Mathews and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 65 , 123504 (2002) [arXiv:astro-ph/0203352]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lyth, D. H., Ungarelli, C., & Wands, D.
Affiliations
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2003-01-10
Volume
67
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2104884586
Cited by
782
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 54
FWCI
31.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
curvaton, primordial perturbations, isocurvature perturbations, adiabatic perturbations, non-Gaussianity, inflation (cosmology), cosmic microwave background anisotropies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review