Cited by 207Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Diluting the cosmological constant in infinite volume extra dimensions

Open access
Dvali, Gia, Gabadadze, Gregory, Shifman, M.·2003·Physical Review D

Abstract

We argue that the cosmological constant problem can be solved in a braneworld model with infinite-volume extra dimensions, avoiding no-go arguments applicable to theories that are four dimensional in the infrared. Gravity on the brane becomes higher dimensional at super-Hubble distances, which entails that the relation between the acceleration rate and vacuum energy density flips upside down compared to the conventional one. The acceleration rate decreases with increasing energy density. The experimentally acceptable rate is obtained for an energy density larger than $(1\mathrm{TeV}{)}^{4}.$ The results are stable under quantum corrections because supersymmetry is broken only on the brane and stays exact in the bulk of infinite-volume extra space. The consistency of 4D gravity and cosmology on the brane requires the quantum gravity scale to be around ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}\mathrm{eV}.$ Testable predictions emerging within this approach are (i) simultaneous modifications of gravity at submillimeter and the Hubble scales and (ii) Hagedorn-type saturation in TeV energy collisions due to the Regge spectrum with a spacing equal to ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}\mathrm{eV}.$

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.67.044020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Massive gravity theories allow for proposals of degravitation mechanisms of the cosmological constant.

    “On more point which is worth highlighting is that such massive gravity theories allow for proposals of degravitation mechanisms of the cosmological constant (Arkani-Hamed et al. 2002; Dvali et al. 2003b).”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Dvali et al. 2003b

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 207

Authors
Dvali, G., Gabadadze, G., & Shifman, M.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2003-02-28
Volume
67
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2055369581
Cited by
207
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
12.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
cosmological constant problem, braneworld models, higher-dimensional gravity, vacuum energy density, modified gravity, quantum gravity scale, Hubble scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review