CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 92

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Pair of accelerated black holes in an anti–de Sitter background: The AdSCmetric

Dias, Óscar J. C., Lemos, José P. S.·2003·Physical Review D
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.67.064001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.67.064001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A dS3 slicing, where -1 < λ < 0, obeys A > L4^{-1}, such that the bulk solution is interpreted as two black holes separated by an acceleration horizon, and the system is not in thermal equilibrium.

    “Meanwhile, a dS 3 slicing, where -1 < λ < 0, obeys A > L -1 4 , such that the bulk solution is interpreted as two black holes separated by an acceleration horizon [344], and the system is not in thermal equilibrium.”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [344]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. W. Kinnersley, 1970, Phys. Rev. D, 2, 1359, 10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1359 · DOI
  2. F. J. Ernst, 1976, J. Math. Phys., 17, 515, 10.1063/1.522935 · DOI
  3. H. Farhoosh, 1979, J. Math. Phys., 20, 2272, 10.1063/1.524008 · DOI
  4. H. Farhoosh, 1980, Phys. Rev. D, 21, 317, 10.1103/PhysRevD.21.317 · DOI
  5. H. Farhoosh, 1981, Phys. Rev. D, 23, 299, 10.1103/PhysRevD.23.299 · DOI
  6. A. Ashtekar, 1981, Commun. Phys. (London), 79, 581
  7. W. B. Bonnor, 1983, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 15, 535, 10.1007/BF00759569 · DOI
  8. W. B. Bonnor, 1984, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 16, 269, 10.1007/BF00762541 · DOI
  9. F. H. J. Cornish, 1995, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 27, 439, 10.1007/BF02107940 · DOI
  10. F. H. J. Cornish, 1995, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 27, 735, 10.1007/BF02105320 · DOI
  11. W. Yongcheng, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 7977, 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.7977 · DOI
  12. V. Pravda, 2001, Class. Quantum Grav., 18, 1205, 10.1088/0264-9381/18/7/305 · DOI
  13. J. Podolský, 2001, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 33, 59, 10.1023/A:1002023918883 · DOI
  14. J. Bičák, 1989, Phys. Rev. D, 40, 1827, 10.1103/PhysRevD.40.1827 · DOI
  15. J. Bičák, 1968, Proc. R. Soc. London, A302, 201, 10.1098/rspa.1968.0004 · DOI
  16. V. Pravda, 2000, Czech. J. Phys., 50, 333, 10.1023/A:1022862309863 · DOI
  17. J. F. Plebański, 1976, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 98, 98, 10.1016/0003-4916(76)90240-2 · DOI · Paper page
  18. H. F. Dowker, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 49, 2909, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.2909 · DOI
  19. H. Farhoosh, 1980, Phys. Rev. D, 21, 2064, 10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2064 · DOI
  20. P. S. Letelier, 2001, Phys. Rev. D, 64, 064005, 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.064005 · DOI
  21. J. Biv̌cák, 1999, Phys. Rev. D, 60, 044004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.044004 · DOI
  22. J. Podolský, 2001, Phys. Rev. D, 63, 024006, 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.024006 · DOI
  23. R. Emparan, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 01, 007, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/007 · DOI · Paper page
  24. R. Emparan, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 01, 021, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/021 · DOI · Paper page
  25. J. Podolský, 2002, Czech. J. Phys., 52, 1, 10.1023/A:1013961411430 · DOI · Paper page
  26. A. Chamblin, 2001, Class. Quantum Grav., 18, L17, 10.1088/0264-9381/18/3/101 · DOI
  27. S. W. Hawking, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 51, 4302, 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.4302 · DOI
  28. R. B. Mann, 1997, Class. Quantum Grav., 14, L109, 10.1088/0264-9381/14/5/007 · DOI
  29. R. B. Mann, 1998, Nucl. Phys., B516, 357, 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00833-X · DOI
  30. J. P. S. Lemos, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 6206, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.6206 · DOI
  31. S. Deser, 1997, Class. Quantum Grav., 14, L163, 10.1088/0264-9381/14/9/003 · DOI
  32. A. Vilenkin, 1985, Phys. Rep., 121, 263, 10.1016/0370-1573(85)90033-X · DOI
  33. O. J. C. Dias, 2002, Class. Quantum Grav., 19, 2265, 10.1088/0264-9381/19/8/314 · DOI
  34. W. Israel, 1964, Nuovo Cimento, 33, 331, 10.1007/BF02750196 · DOI
  35. M. S. Costa, 2000, Nucl. Phys., B591, 469, 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00577-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dias, Ó. J. C., & Lemos, J. P. S.
Venue
Physical Review D
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2003-03-10
Volume
67
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0556-2821
  • 1089-4918
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.67.064001
Cited by
92
References
0
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review