The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antiprotons in cosmic rays from neutralino annihilation
Open accessAbstract
We calculate the antiproton flux due to relic neutralino annihilations, in a two-dimensional diffusion model compatible with stable and radioactive cosmic ray nuclei. We find that the uncertainty in the primary flux induced by the propagation parameters alone is about two orders of magnitude at low energies, and it is mainly determined by the lack of knowledge of the thickness of the diffusive halo. On the contrary, different dark matter density profiles do not significantly alter the flux: a Novarro-Frenk-White distribution produces fluxes which are at most 20% higher than an isothermal sphere. The most conservative choice for propagation parameters and dark matter distribution normalization, together with current data on cosmic antiprotons, cannot lead to any definitive constraint on the supersymmetric parameter space, either in a low-energy effective minimal supersymmetric standard model, or in a minimal supergravity scheme. However, if the best choice for propagation parameters---corresponding to a diffusive halo of $L=4\mathrm{kpc}$---is adopted, some supersymmetric configurations with the neutralino mass ${m}_{\ensuremath{\chi}}\ensuremath{\lesssim}100\mathrm{GeV}$ should be considered as excluded. An enhancement flux factor---due for instance to a clumpy dark halo or a higher local dark matter density---would imply a more severe cut on the supersymmetric parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., Limon, M., Meyer, S. S., Page, L., Spergel, D. N., Tucker, G. S., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377253 · Cited by 4,860
Cited by
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 · Cited by 4,979
Dark matter and collider phenomenology of universal extra dimensions
Hooper, D., & Profumo, S. (2007) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.09.003 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Donato, F., Fornengo, N., Maurin, D., Salati, P., & Taillet, R.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2004-03-02
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2019889489
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antiprotons in cosmic rays from neutralino annihilation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.69.063501
- The paper
- Donato, F., Fornengo, N., Maurin, D., Salati, P., & Taillet, R. (2004). Antiprotons in cosmic rays from neutralino annihilation. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.69.063501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.