The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A travel guide to the dark matter annihilation signal
Open accessAbstract
We provide a ``Baedecker'' or travel guide to the directions on the sky where the dark matter annihilation signal may be expected. We calculate the flux of high energy $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ rays from annihilation of neutralino dark matter in the center of the Milky Way and the three nearest dwarf spheroidals (Sagittarius, Draco, and Canis Major), using realistic models of the dark matter distribution. Other investigators have used cusped dark halo profiles (such as the Navarro-Frenk-White profile) to claim a significant signal. This ignores the substantial astrophysical evidence that the Milky Way is not dark-matter dominated in the inner regions. We show that the annihilation signal from the Galactic Center falls by two orders of magnitude on substituting a cored dark matter density profile for a cusped one. The present and future generation of high energy $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray detectors, whether atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes or space missions such as GLAST, lack the sensitivity to detect any of the monochromatic $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray annihilation lines. The continuum $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray signal above 1 GeV and above 50 GeV may, however, be detectable either from the dwarf spheroidals or from the Milky Way itself. If the density profiles of the dwarf spheroidals are cusped, then the best prospects are for detecting Sagittarius and Canis Major. However, if the dwarf spheroidals have milder, cored profiles, then the annihilation signal is not detectable. For GLAST, an attractive strategy is to exploit the wide field of view and observe the Milky Way at medium latitudes, as suggested by Stoehr et al. This is reasonably robust against changes in the density profile.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
Cited by
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 · Cited by 4,979
Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., Albert, A., Atwood, W. B., Baldini, L., Ballet, J., Barbiellini, G., Bastieri, D., Bechtol, K., Bellazzini, R., et al. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.241302 · Cited by 566
The Astrophysics of Ultrahigh-Energy Cosmic Rays
Kotera, K., & Olinto, A. V. (2011) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102620 · Cited by 470
Dark matter and collider phenomenology of universal extra dimensions
Hooper, D., & Profumo, S. (2007) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.09.003 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Evans, N., Ferrer, F., & Sarkar, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2113667486
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.