The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observational constraints on interacting quintessence models
Open accessAbstract
We determine the range of parameter space of an Interacting Quintessence Model that best fits the recent WMAP measurements of Cosmic Microwave Background temperature anisotropies. We only consider cosmological models with zero spatial curvature. We show that if the quintessence scalar field decays into cold dark matter at a rate that brings the ratio of matter to dark energy constant at late times, the cosmological parameters required to fit the CMB data are: dark energy density ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{x}=0.43\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.12$, baryon fraction ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{b}=0.08\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.01$, slope of the matter power spectrum at large scales ${n}_{s}=0.98\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.02$ and Hubble constant ${H}_{0}=56\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}4\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{km}/\mathrm{s}/\mathrm{Mpc}$. The data prefers a dark energy component with a dimensionless decay rate parameter ${c}^{2}=0.005$ and noninteracting models are consistent with the data only at the $99.9%$ confidence level. Using the Bayesian Information Criteria we show that this extra parameter fits the data better than models with no interaction. The quintessence equation of state parameter is less constrained; i.e., the data sets an upper limit ${w}_{x}\ensuremath{\le}\ensuremath{-}0.86$ at the same level of significance. When the WMAP anisotropy data are combined with supernovae data, the density parameter of dark energy increases to ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{x}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.68$ while ${c}^{2}$ augments to $6.3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$. Models with quintessence decaying into dark matter provide a clean explanation for the coincidence problem and are a viable cosmological model, compatible with observations of the CMB, with testable predictions. Accurate measurements of baryon fraction and/or of matter density independent of the CMB data, would support/disprove these models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
The cosmological constant problem
Weinberg, S. (1989) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.61.1 · Cited by 7,341
Riess, A. G., Strolger, L., Tonry, J., Casertano, S., Ferguson, H. C., Mobasher, B., Challis, P., Filippenko, A. V., Jha, S., Li, W., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/383612 · Cited by 4,315
Kogut, A., Spergel, D. N., Barnes, C., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Limon, M., Meyer, S. S., Page, L., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377219 · Cited by 938
Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies
Hu, W., & Dodelson, S. (2002) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093926 · Cited by 745
Cited by
Modified gravity theories on a nutshell: Inflation, bounce and late-time evolution
Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S. D., & Oikonomou, V. K. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.06.001 · Cited by 2,734
Large-scale instability in interacting dark energy and dark matter fluids
Väliviita, J., Majerotto, E., & Maartens, R. (2008) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/07/020 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Olivares, G., Atrio-Barandela, F., & Pavón, D.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-03-22
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2039439567
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.