Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hadronic contributions to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon

Open access
de Trocóniz, J. F., Ynduráin, F. J.·2005·Physical Review D

Abstract

We present a new, completely revised calculation of the muon anomalous magnetic moment ${a}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}=({g}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}\ensuremath{-}2)/2$ comparing it with the more recent experimental determination of this quantity; this furnishes an important test of theories of strong, weak, and electromagnetic interactions. These theoretical determinations give the very precise numbers, ${10}^{11}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{a}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}=116\text{ }591\text{ }806\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}50\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}10(\mathrm{rad})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}30(\ensuremath{\ell}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\ensuremath{\ell})\text{ }\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}[\mathrm{Theory},\mathrm{no}\text{ }\text{ }\ensuremath{\tau}]$ and ${10}^{11}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{a}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}=116\text{ }591\text{ }889\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}49\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}10(\mathrm{rad})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}30(\ensuremath{\ell}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\ensuremath{\ell})\text{ }[\mathrm{Theory},\ensuremath{\tau}]$ to be compared with the experimental number, ${10}^{11}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{a}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}=116\text{ }592\text{ }080\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}60$. In the theoretical evaluations, the first quantity does not, and the second one does, use information from $\ensuremath{\tau}$ decay. The first errors for the theoretical evaluations include statistical plus systematic errors; the other ones are the estimated errors due to incomplete treatment of radiative corrections and the estimated error in the light-by-light scattering contribution. We thus have a significant mismatch between theory and experiment. We also use part of the theoretical calculations to give a precise evaluation of the electromagnetic coupling on the $Z$, ${\overline{\ensuremath{\alpha}}}_{\mathrm{QED}}({M}_{Z}^{2})$, of the masses and widths of the (charged and neutral) rho resonances, of the scattering length and effective range for the $P$ wave in $\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\pi}$ scattering, and of the quadratic radius and second coefficient of the pion form factor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.71.073008

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
de Trocóniz, J. F., & Ynduráin, F. J.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2005-04-22
Volume
71
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2113859228
Cited by
163
References
0
FWCI
16.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hadronic contributions to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.71.073008
The paper
de Trocóniz, J. F., & Ynduráin, F. J. (2005). Hadronic contributions to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.71.073008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.