The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Update on the direct detection of supersymmetric dark matter
Open accessAbstract
We compare updated predictions for the elastic scattering of supersymmetric neutralino dark matter with the improved experimental upper limit recently published by Cryogenic Dark Matter Search (CDMS) II. We take into account the possibility that the $\ensuremath{\pi}$-nucleon $\ensuremath{\Sigma}$ term may be somewhat larger than was previously considered plausible, as may be supported by the masses of exotic baryons reported recently. We also incorporate the new central value of ${m}_{t}$, which affects indirectly constraints on the supersymmetric parameter space, for example, via calculations of the relic density. Even if a large value of $\ensuremath{\Sigma}$ is assumed, the CDMS II data currently exclude only small parts of the parameter space in the constrained minimal standard model (CMSSM) with universal soft supersymmetry-breaking Higgs, squark, and slepton masses. None of the previously proposed CMSSM benchmark scenarios is excluded for any value of $\ensuremath{\Sigma}$, and the CDMS II data do not impinge on the domains of the CMSSM parameter space favored at the 90% confidence level in a recent likelihood analysis. However, some models with nonuniversal Higgs, squark, and slepton masses and neutralino masses $\ensuremath{\lesssim}700\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$ are excluded by the CDMS II data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., Limon, M., Meyer, S. S., Page, L., Spergel, D. N., Tucker, G. S., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377253 · Cited by 4,860
Cited by
First Results from the XENON10 Dark Matter Experiment at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory
Angle, J., Aprile, E., Arneodo, F., Baudis, L., Bernstein, A., Bolozdynya, A., Brusov, P., Coelho, L. C. C., Dahl, C. E., DeViveiros, L., et al. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.021303 · Cited by 648
Ahmed, Z., Akerib, D. S., Arrenberg, S., Attisha, M. J., Bailey, C. N., Baudis, L., Bauer, D. A., Beaty, J., Brink, P. L., Bruch, T., et al. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.011301 · Cited by 419
Dark matter and collider phenomenology of universal extra dimensions
Hooper, D., & Profumo, S. (2007) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.09.003 · Cited by 358
Akerib, D. S., Attisha, M. J., Bailey, C. N., Baudis, L., Bauer, D. A., Brink, P. L., Brusov, P. P., Bunker, R., Cabrera, B., Caldwell, D. O., et al. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.011302 · Cited by 331
Coupled variations of fundamental couplings and primordial nucleosynthesis
Coc, A., Nunes, N. J., Olive, K. A., Uzan, J.-P., & Vangioni, E. (2007) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.023511 · Cited by 178
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellis, J., Olive, K. A., Santoso, Y., & Spanos, V. C.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-05-12
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 9
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2130336961
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.