The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Uncorrelated measurements of the cosmic expansion history and dark energy from supernovae
Open accessAbstract
We present a method for measuring the cosmic expansion history $H(z)$ in uncorrelated redshift bins, and apply it to current and simulated type Ia supernova data assuming spatial flatness. If the matter density parameter ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{m}$ can be accurately measured from other data, then the dark-energy density history $X(z)={\ensuremath{\rho}}_{X}(z)/{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{X}(0)$ can trivially be derived from this expansion history $H(z)$. In contrast to customary ``black box'' parameter fitting, our method is transparent and easy to interpret: the measurement of $H(z{)}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ in a redshift bin is simply a linear combination of the measured comoving distances for supernovae in that bin, making it obvious how systematic errors propagate from input to output. We find the Riess et al. (2004) gold sample to be consistent with the vanilla concordance model where the dark energy is a cosmological constant. We compare two mission concepts for the NASA/DOE Joint Dark-Energy Mission (JDEM), the Joint Efficient Dark-energy Investigation (JEDI), and the Supernova Accelaration Probe (SNAP), using simulated data including the effect of weak lensing (based on numerical simulations) and a systematic bias from K corrections. Estimating $H(z)$ in seven uncorrelated redshift bins, we find that both provide dramatic improvements over current data: JEDI can measure $H(z)$ to about 10% accuracy and SNAP to 30%--40% accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Riess, A. G., Strolger, L., Tonry, J., Casertano, S., Ferguson, H. C., Mobasher, B., Challis, P., Filippenko, A. V., Jha, S., Li, W., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/383612 · Cited by 4,315
Cited by
Riess, A. G., Strolger, L., Casertano, S., Ferguson, H. C., Mobasher, B., Gold, B., Challis, P. J., Filippenko, A. V., Jha, S., Li, W., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/510378 · Cited by 1,758
SAHNI, V., & STAROBINSKY, A. (2006) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271806009704 · Cited by 734
Two new diagnostics of dark energy
Sahni, V., Shafieloo, A., & Starobinsky, A. A. (2008) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.103502 · Cited by 709
Observational constraints on dark energy and cosmic curvature
Wang, Y., & Mukherjee, P. (2007) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.103533 · Cited by 264
Self-citationCosmic dynamics in the era of Extremely Large Telescopes
Liske, J., Grazian, A., Vanzella, E., Dessauges, M., Viel, M., Pasquini, L., Haehnelt, M., Cristiani, S., Pepe, F., Avila, G., et al. (2008) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13090.x · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., & Tegmark, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-05-20
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W1990122673
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.