The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observational constraints on dark energy and cosmic curvature
Open accessAbstract
Current observational bounds on dark energy depend on our assumptions about the curvature of the universe. We present a simple and efficient method for incorporating constraints from cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy data and use it to derive constraints on cosmic curvature and dark energy density as a free function of cosmic time using current CMB, Type Ia supernova (SN Ia), and baryon acoustic oscillation data. We show that there are two CMB shift parameters, $R\ensuremath{\equiv}\sqrt{{\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{m}{H}_{0}^{2}}r({z}_{\mathrm{CMB}})$ (the scaled distance to recombination) and ${l}_{a}\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{\pi}r({z}_{\mathrm{CMB}})/{r}_{s}({z}_{\mathrm{CMB}})$ (the angular scale of the sound horizon at recombination), with measured values that are nearly uncorrelated with each other. Allowing nonzero cosmic curvature, the three-year WMAP (Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe) data give $R=1.71\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.03$, ${l}_{a}=302.5\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.2$, and ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{b}{h}^{2}=0.02173\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.00082$, independent of the dark energy model. The corresponding bounds for a flat universe are $R=1.70\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.03$, ${l}_{a}=302.2\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.2$, and ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{b}{h}^{2}=0.022\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.00082$. We give the covariance matrix of $(R,{l}_{a},{\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{b}{h}^{2})$ from the three-year WMAP data. We find that $(R,{l}_{a},{\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{b}{h}^{2})$ provide an efficient and intuitive summary of CMB data as far as dark energy constraints are concerned. Assuming the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) prior of ${H}_{0}=72\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}8\text{ }\text{ }(\mathrm{km}/\mathrm{s})\text{ }{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, using 182 SNe Ia (from the HST/GOODS program, the first year Supernova Legacy Survey, and nearby SN Ia surveys), $(R,{l}_{a},{\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{b}{h}^{2})$ from WMAP three-year data, and SDSS (Sloan Digital Sky Survey) measurement of the baryon acoustic oscillation scale, we find that dark energy density is consistent with a constant in cosmic time, with marginal deviations from a cosmological constant that may reflect current systematic uncertainties or true evolution in dark energy. A flat universe is allowed by current data: ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{k}=\ensuremath{-}{0.006}_{\ensuremath{-}0.012\ensuremath{-}0.025}^{+0.013+0.025}$ for assuming that the dark energy equation of state ${w}_{X}(z)$ is constant, and ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{k}=\ensuremath{-}{0.002}_{\ensuremath{-}0.018\ensuremath{-}0.032}^{+0.018+0.041}$ for ${w}_{X}(z)={w}_{0}+{w}_{a}(1\ensuremath{-}a)$ (68% and 95% confidence levels). The bounds on cosmic curvature are less stringent if dark energy density is allowed to be a free function of cosmic time, and are also dependent on the assumption about the early time property of dark energy. We demonstrate this by studying two examples. Significant improvement in dark energy and cosmic curvature constraints is expected as a result of future dark energy and CMB experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Savitzky-Golay Smoothing Filters
Press, W. H., & Teukolsky, S. A. (1990) · Computers in Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4822961 · Cited by 11,670
Three‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Implications for Cosmology
Spergel, D. N., Bean, R., Dore, O., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Dunkley, J., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Komatsu, E., Page, L., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/513700 · Cited by 6,778
The cosmological constant and dark energy
Peebles, P. J. E., & Ratra, B. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.559 · Cited by 5,213
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Eisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/466512 · Cited by 4,629
Cosmological Imprint of an Energy Component with General Equation of State
Caldwell, R. R., Dave, R., & Steinhardt, P. J. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.1582 · Cited by 3,694
4D gravity on a brane in 5D Minkowski space
Dvali, G., Gabadadze, G., & Porrati, M. (2000) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00669-9 · Cited by 3,513
Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach
Lewis, A., & Bridle, S. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.103511 · Cited by 3,495
Cited by
SEVEN-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE(WMAP) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Smith, K. M., Dunkley, J., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Nolta, M. R., Page, L., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 · Cited by 8,802
FIVE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Limon, M., Page, L., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/330 · Cited by 5,786
CHANDRA CLUSTER COSMOLOGY PROJECT III: COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER CONSTRAINTS
Vikhlinin, A., Kravtsov, A. V., Burenin, R. A., Ebeling, H., Forman, W. R., Hornstrup, A., Jones, C., Murray, S. S., Nagai, D., Quintana, H., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/692/2/1060 · Cited by 1,080
Quintom cosmology: Theoretical implications and observations
Cai, Y.-F., Saridakis, E. N., Setare, M. R., & Xia, J.-Q. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.04.001 · Cited by 868
DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints
Abdul Karim, M., Aguilar, J., Ahlen, S., Alam, S., Allen, L., Prieto, C. A., Alves, O., Anand, A., Andrade, U., Armengaud, E., et al. (2025) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/tr6y-kpc6 · Cited by 856
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., & Mukherjee, P.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-11-30
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2160161686
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 80
- FWCI
- 16.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observational constraints on dark energy and cosmic curvature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.76.103533
- The paper
- Wang, Y., & Mukherjee, P. (2007). Observational constraints on dark energy and cosmic curvature. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.76.103533
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.