Cited by 142Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

Non-Gaussianity from the second-order cosmological perturbation

Open access
Lyth, David H., Rodríguez, Yeinzon·2005·Physical Review D

Abstract

Several conserved and/or gauge-invariant quantities described as the second-order curvature perturbation have been given in the literature. We revisit various scenarios for the generation of second-order non-Gaussianity in the primordial curvature perturbation $\ensuremath{\zeta}$, employing for the first time a unified notation and focusing on the normalization ${f}_{\mathrm{NL}}$ of the bispectrum. When $\ensuremath{\zeta}$ first appears a few Hubble times after horizon exit, $|{f}_{\mathrm{NL}}|$ is much less than 1 and is, therefore, negligible. Thereafter $\ensuremath{\zeta}$ (and hence ${f}_{\mathrm{NL}}$) is conserved as long as the pressure is a unique function of energy density (adiabatic pressure). Nonadiabatic pressure comes presumably only from the effect of fields, other than the one pointing along the inflationary trajectory, which are light during inflation (``light noninflaton fields''). During single-component inflation ${f}_{\mathrm{NL}}$ is constant, but multicomponent inflation might generate $|{f}_{\mathrm{NL}}|\ensuremath{\sim}1$ or bigger. Preheating can affect ${f}_{\mathrm{NL}}$ only in atypical scenarios where it involves light noninflaton fields. The simplest curvaton scenario typically gives ${f}_{\mathrm{NL}}\ensuremath{\ll}\ensuremath{-}1$ or ${f}_{\mathrm{NL}}=+5/4$. The inhomogeneous reheating scenario can give a wide range of values for ${f}_{\mathrm{NL}}$. Unless there is a detection, observation can eventually provide a limit $|{f}_{\mathrm{NL}}|\ensuremath{\lesssim}1$, at which level it will be crucial to calculate the precise observational limit using second-order theory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.71.123508

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to the δN-formalism, ζ evaluated at some time tc is equivalent, on large scales, to the perturbation of the number of e-foldings N from an initial flat hypersurface at t* to a final comoving or uniform density hypersurface at tc.

    “According to the so called δN -formalism [30, 31, 32], ζ , evaluated at some time t = t c , is equivalent, on large scales , to the perturbation of the number of e -foldings N ( t c , t ∗ , x ) from an initial fl at hypersurface at t = t ∗ , to a final comoving - or, equivalently, uniform density - hypersurface at t = t c .”

    From Non-Gaussianities in two-field inflation (2006) · cites this paper as [30]

    In “Two definitions of the curvature perturbation” (p. 2), the paper defines ζ on uniform-density slices and says these practically coincide with comoving slices. In “Single-component inflation” (p. 7), it relates ζ to a difference in e-folds between slicings. The available text does not state the claim’s specific construction from an initial flat hypersurface at t* to a final uniform-density hypersurface at tc. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lyth, D. H., & Rodríguez, Y.
Affiliations
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • Universidad Antonio Nariño (CO)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2005-06-07
Volume
71
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2163615938
Cited by
142
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Bogotá (Banco de la República) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
primordial non-Gaussianity, bispectrum, f_NL, preheating, cosmic inflation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review