Cited by 41Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryCosmology and Gravitation Theories

General solution for classical sequential growth dynamics of causal sets

Open access
Varadarajan, Madhavan, Rideout, David·2006·Physical Review D

Abstract

A classical precursor to a full quantum dynamics for causal sets has been formulated in terms of a stochastic sequential growth process in which the elements of the causal set arise in a sort of accretion process. The transition probabilities of the Markov growth process satisfy certain physical requirements of causality and general covariance, and the generic solution with all transition probabilities nonzero has been found. Here we remove the assumption of nonzero probabilities, define a reasonable extension of the physical requirements to cover the case of vanishing probabilities, and find the completely general solution to these physical conditions. The resulting family of growth processes has an interesting structure reminiscent of an ``infinite tower of turtles'' cosmology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.73.104021

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In CSG models, there is nothing corresponding to a three-dimensional space evolving in time; rather the model is four-dimensional from the beginning but incomplete at any stage of growth.

    “On the other hand, there is nothing in the model corresponding to a three-dimensional space 'evolving in time'. Rather, one meets with something which is 'four dimensional' from the very beginning, but which at any stage of its growth is still incomplete .”

    From Relativity Theory Does Not Imply that the Future Already Exists: A Counterexample (2007) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Introduction (p. 2) describes growth by adding elements to a finite causal set at successive stages, supporting the idea that the growing set is incomplete at each stage. Section II (p. 3) likewise describes a path from the empty causal set through finite causal sets. The paper does not establish the claim that the model is four-dimensional from the beginning or explicitly contrast it with a three-dimensional space evolving in time. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A CSG model manifests 'becoming' to the extent that any mathematical model can, via an unceasing cascade of birth-events that build up the causal set.

    “On one hand sequential growth seems to me to manifest 'becoming' to the extent that any mathematical model can. It even provides an objective correlate of our subjective perception of 'time passing' in the unceasing cascade of birth-events that build up the causal set, by 'accretion' as it were.”

    From Relativity Theory Does Not Imply that the Future Already Exists: A Counterexample (2007) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Introduction (p. 2) describes sequential growth as adding a new element at each stage, and Section II (p. 3) describes a path of such transitions from the empty causal set. These passages support the accretion of elements, but the paper does not say that this manifests ‘becoming’ or correlates with the subjective perception of time passing. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The classical sequential growth (CSG) models of causal set theory are counterexamples to the contention that relativistic spacetime is incompatible with genuine change or becoming.

    “I offer the classical sequential growth models of causal set theory as counterexamples.”
  • The development of the CSG models is persuasive evidence that the combination of becoming and four-dimensionality can be heuristically fruitful.

    “If, on the other hand, we ask not whether becoming is 'logically consistent' with four-dimensionality, but rather whether the combination of the two notions can be heuristically fruitful, then I think that the development of the CSG models is in fact persuasive evidence that it can.”
  • A CSG model describes a stochastic process in which elements of the growing causal set are born one by one, each with a definite subset of already born elements as ancestors, defining a Markov process.

    “A CSG model describes a stochastic process in which elements e of the growing causal set C are born one by one, each with a definite subset of the already born elements as its ancestors.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]J. Lee, Limits of Sequential Growth Dynamics , unpublished manuscript from talk given at the first Causal Sets Workshop in Syracuse, NY, Dec. 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varadarajan, M., & Rideout, D.
Affiliations
  • Raman Research Institute (IN)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2006-05-16
Volume
73
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2058302480
Cited by
40
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
causal sets, stochastic growth processes, Markov processes, transition probabilities, causality, general covariance, quantum gravity, discrete spacetime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review