The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clustering of dark matter tracers: Renormalizing the bias parameters
Open accessAbstract
A commonly used perturbative method for computing large-scale clustering of tracers of mass density, like galaxies, is to model the tracer density field as a Taylor series in the local smoothed mass density fluctuations, possibly adding a stochastic component. I suggest a set of parameter redefinitions, eliminating problematic perturbative correction terms, that should represent a modest improvement, at least, to this method. As presented here, my method can be used to compute the power spectrum and bispectrum to 4th order in initial density perturbations, and higher order extensions should be straightforward. While the model is technically unchanged at this order, just reparametrized, the renormalized model is more elegant, and should have better convergence behavior, for three reasons: First, in the usual approach the effects of beyond-linear-order bias parameters can be seen at asymptotically large scales, while after renormalization the linear model is preserved in the large-scale limit, i.e., the effects of higher order bias parameters are restricted to relatively high $k$. Second, while the standard approach includes smoothing to suppress large perturbative correction terms, resulting in dependence on the arbitrary cutoff scale, no cutoff-sensitive terms appear explicitly after my redefinitions (and, relatedly, my correction terms are less sensitive to high-$k$, nonlinear, power). Third, the 3rd order bias parameter disappears entirely, so my model has one fewer free parameter than usual (this parameter was redundant at the order considered). This model predicts no significant modification of the baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) signal, in real space, supporting the robustness of BAO as a probe of dark energy, and providing a complete perturbative description over the relevant range of scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baryon oscillations and dark-energy constraints from imaging surveys
Dolney, D., Jain, B., & Takada, M. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09606.x · Cited by 52
Cited by
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
How to evade the sample variance limit on measurements of redshift-space distortions
McDonald, P., & Seljak, U. (2009) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/10/007 · Cited by 268
Self-citationYoo, J. (2010) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.083508 · Cited by 256
Matsubara, T. (2008) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.083519 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonald, P.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2006-11-10
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2006344085
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clustering of dark matter tracers: Renormalizing the bias parameters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.74.103512
- The paper
- McDonald, P. (2006). Clustering of dark matter tracers: Renormalizing the bias parameters. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.74.103512
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.