The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
General relativistic description of the observed galaxy power spectrum: Do we understand what we measure?
Open accessAbstract
We extend the general relativistic description of galaxy clustering developed in Yoo, Fitzpatrick, and Zaldarriaga (2009). For the first time we provide a fully general relativistic description of the observed matter power spectrum and the observed galaxy power spectrum with the linear bias ansatz. It is significantly different from the standard Newtonian description on large scales and especially its measurements on large scales can be misinterpreted as the detection of the primordial non-Gaussianity even in the absence thereof. The key difference in the observed galaxy power spectrum arises from the real-space matter fluctuation defined as the matter fluctuation at the hypersurface of the observed redshift. As opposed to the standard description, the shape of the observed galaxy power spectrum evolves in redshift, providing additional cosmological information. While the systematic errors in the standard Newtonian description are negligible in the current galaxy surveys at low redshift, correct general relativistic description is essential for understanding the galaxy power spectrum measurements on large scales in future surveys with redshift depth $z\ensuremath{\ge}3$. We discuss ways to improve the detection significance in the current galaxy surveys and comment on applications of our general relativistic formalism in future surveys.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, Jr., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., Bakken, J. A., Barkhouser, R., Bastian, S., Berman, E., et al. (2000) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/301513 · Cited by 10,366
Non-gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models
Maldacena, J. (2003) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/013 · Cited by 2,906
Clustering in real space and in redshift space
Kaiser, N. (1987) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/227.1.1 · Cited by 2,750
Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations
Bardeen, J. M. (1980) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.1882 · Cited by 2,393
Stable clustering, the halo model and non-linear cosmological power spectra
Smith, R. E., Peacock, J. A., Jenkins, A., White, S. D. M., Frenk, C. S., Pearce, F. R., Thomas, P. A., Efstathiou, G., & Couchman, H. M. P. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06503.x · Cited by 2,054
A Line-of-Sight Integration Approach to Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies
Seljak, U., & Zaldarriaga, M. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177793 · Cited by 2,019
Cosmological constraints from the SDSS luminous red galaxies
Tegmark, M., Eisenstein, D. J., Strauss, M. A., Weinberg, D. H., Blanton, M. R., Frieman, J. A., Fukugita, M., Gunn, J. E., Hamilton, A. J. S., Knapp, G. R., et al. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.123507 · Cited by 1,400
Self-citationOn the spatial correlations of Abell clusters
Kaiser, N. (1984) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/184341 · Cited by 1,328
Spectroscopic Target Selection for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: The Luminous Red Galaxy Sample
Eisenstein, D. J., Annis, J., Gunn, J. E., Szalay, A. S., Connolly, A. J., Nichol, R. C., Bahcall, N. A., Bernardi, M., Burles, S., Castander, F. J., et al. (2001) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/323717 · Cited by 1,032
Power-spectrum analysis of three-dimensional redshift surveys
Feldman, H. A., Kaiser, N., & Peacock, J. A. (1994) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/174036 · Cited by 927
Cited by
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
Linear power spectrum of observed source number counts
Challinor, A., & Lewis, A. (2011) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.043516 · Cited by 512
Breaking a dark degeneracy with gravitational waves
Lombriser, L., & Taylor, A. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/03/031 · Cited by 394
Curvature constraints from large scale structure
Dio, E. D., Montanari, F., Raccanelli, A., Durrer, R., Kamionkowski, M., & Lesgourgues, J. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/06/013 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Yoo, J.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2010-10-07
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2116086589
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: General relativistic description of the observed galaxy power spectrum: Do we understand what we measure? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.82.083508
- The paper
- Yoo, J. (2010). General relativistic description of the observed galaxy power spectrum: Do we understand what we measure? Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.82.083508
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.