Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gauss-Bonnet quintessence: Background evolution, large scale structure, and cosmological constraints

Open access
Koivisto, Tomi, Mota, David F.·2007·Physical Review D

Abstract

We investigate a string-inspired dark energy scenario featuring a scalar field with a coupling to the Gauss-Bonnet invariant. We discuss extensively the cosmological and astrophysical implications of the coupled scalar field. Such coupling can trigger the onset of late dark energy domination after a scaling matter era. The universe may then cross the phantom divide and perhaps also exit from the acceleration. The evolution of fluctuations in the scalar field and their impact on the clustering of matter are studied in detail and model independently. The small-scale limit is derived for the perturbations and their stability is addressed. The general equations for scalar perturbations are also presented and solved numerically, confirming that the Gauss-Bonnet coupling can be compatible with the observed spectrum of cosmic microwave background radiation as well as the matter power spectrum inferred from large-scale surveys. Data from the solar system, supernovae Ia, cosmic microwave background radiation, large-scale structure, and big bang nucleosynthesis are used to constrain the parameters of the model. The geometric constraints from background expansion favor exponential potentials with a shallow slope, which is in tension with the nucleosynthesis bound on early quintessence. Also, high values for the present matter density are required. Including the baryon oscillation scale, one could rule out the model at about 99% confidence level. A discussion of how to overcome such possible problems in more elaborate models is included, together with considerations of the validity of these constraints in the present context. Interestingly, one also finds that a good Newtonian limit may require fixing the coupling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.75.023518

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 209

Metadata

Authors
Koivisto, T., & Mota, D. F.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2007-01-19
Volume
75
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W1966780261
Cited by
209
References
8
FWCI
19.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gauss-Bonnet quintessence: Background evolution, large scale structure, and cosmological constraints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.75.023518
The paper
Koivisto, T., & Mota, D. F. (2007). Gauss-Bonnet quintessence: Background evolution, large scale structure, and cosmological constraints. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.75.023518

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.