The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gauss-Bonnet quintessence: Background evolution, large scale structure, and cosmological constraints
Open accessAbstract
We investigate a string-inspired dark energy scenario featuring a scalar field with a coupling to the Gauss-Bonnet invariant. We discuss extensively the cosmological and astrophysical implications of the coupled scalar field. Such coupling can trigger the onset of late dark energy domination after a scaling matter era. The universe may then cross the phantom divide and perhaps also exit from the acceleration. The evolution of fluctuations in the scalar field and their impact on the clustering of matter are studied in detail and model independently. The small-scale limit is derived for the perturbations and their stability is addressed. The general equations for scalar perturbations are also presented and solved numerically, confirming that the Gauss-Bonnet coupling can be compatible with the observed spectrum of cosmic microwave background radiation as well as the matter power spectrum inferred from large-scale surveys. Data from the solar system, supernovae Ia, cosmic microwave background radiation, large-scale structure, and big bang nucleosynthesis are used to constrain the parameters of the model. The geometric constraints from background expansion favor exponential potentials with a shallow slope, which is in tension with the nucleosynthesis bound on early quintessence. Also, high values for the present matter density are required. Including the baryon oscillation scale, one could rule out the model at about 99% confidence level. A discussion of how to overcome such possible problems in more elaborate models is included, together with considerations of the validity of these constraints in the present context. Interestingly, one also finds that a good Newtonian limit may require fixing the coupling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Three‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Implications for Cosmology
Spergel, D. N., Bean, R., Dore, O., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Dunkley, J., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Komatsu, E., Page, L., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/513700 · Cited by 6,778
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 · Cited by 4,979
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Riess, A. G., Strolger, L., Tonry, J., Casertano, S., Ferguson, H. C., Mobasher, B., Challis, P., Filippenko, A. V., Jha, S., Li, W., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/383612 · Cited by 4,315
Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations
Bardeen, J. M. (1980) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.1882 · Cited by 2,393
String theory and quintessence
Hellerman, S., Kaloper, N., & Susskind, L. (2001) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/06/003 · Cited by 256
Differentiating between modified gravity and dark energy
Lue, A., Scoccimarro, R., & Starkman, G. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.044005 · Cited by 210
Ghosts, instabilities, and superluminal propagation in modified gravity models
Felice, A. D., Hindmarsh, M., & Trodden, M. (2006) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2006/08/005 · Cited by 155
Cited by
Models off(R)cosmic acceleration that evade solar system tests
Hu, W., & Sawicki, I. (2007) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.064004 · Cited by 1,736
Construction of cosmologically viable gravity models
De Felice, A., & Tsujikawa, S. (2009) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.03.060 · Cited by 366
Vector field models of inflation and dark energy
Koivisto, T., & Mota, D. F. (2008) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/021 · Cited by 289
Self-citationModified Gravity Models of Dark Energy
Tsujikawa, S. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-10598-2_3 · Cited by 285
Observational constraints on dark energy and cosmic curvature
Wang, Y., & Mukherjee, P. (2007) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.103533 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Koivisto, T., & Mota, D. F.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-01-19
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W1966780261
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 19.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gauss-Bonnet quintessence: Background evolution, large scale structure, and cosmological constraints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.75.023518
- The paper
- Koivisto, T., & Mota, D. F. (2007). Gauss-Bonnet quintessence: Background evolution, large scale structure, and cosmological constraints. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.75.023518
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.