Cited by 129Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

Cuscuton cosmology: Dark energy meets modified gravity

Open access
Afshordi, Niayesh, Chung, Daniel J. H., Doran, Michael, Geshnizjani, Ghazal·2007·Physical Review D

Abstract

In a companion paper, we have introduced a model of scalar field dark energy, Cuscuton, which can be realized as the incompressible (or infinite speed of sound) limit of a $k$-essence fluid. In this paper, we study how Cuscuton modifies the constraint sector of Einstein gravity. In particular, we study Cuscuton cosmology and show that even though Cuscuton can have an arbitrary equation of state, or time dependence, and is thus inhomogeneous, its perturbations do not introduce any additional dynamical degree of freedom and only satisfy a constraint equation, amounting to an effective modification of gravity on large scales. Therefore, Cuscuton can be considered to be a minimal theory of evolving dark energy, or a minimal modification of a cosmological constant, as it has no internal dynamics. Moreover, this is the only modification of Einstein gravity to our knowledge, that does not introduce any additional degrees of freedom (and is not conformally equivalent to the Einstein gravity). We then study two simple Cuscuton models, with quadratic and exponential potentials. The quadratic model has the exact same expansion history as $\ensuremath{\Lambda}\mathrm{CDM}$, and yet contains an early dark energy component with constant energy fraction, which is constrained to ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{Q}\ensuremath{\lesssim}2%$, mainly from WMAP Cosmic Microwave Background and Sloan Digital Sky Survey Lyman-$\ensuremath{\alpha}$ forest observations. The exponential model has the same expansion history as the Dvali-Gabadadze-Poratti self-accelerating brane-world model, but generates a much smaller Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect, and is thus consistent with the Cosmic Microwave Background observations. Finally, we show that the evolution is local on superhorizon scales, implying that there is no gross violation of causality, despite Cuscuton's infinite speed of sound.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.75.123509

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Afshordi et al. (2007a) state Cuscuton can be viewed as effective modification of gravity on large scales and is the only modification of Einstein gravity that does not introduce additional degrees of freedom and is not conformally equivalent to GR.

    “They state that the model can be viewed as an effective modification of gravity on large scales. They also remark that this is the only modification of Einstein gravity that does not introduce any additional degrees of freedom and is not conformally equivalent to GR.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Afshordi et al. 2007a

  • Afshordi et al. (2007a, b) introduced Cuscuton based on infinite sound speed limit of k-essence model fluid.

    “Afshordi et al. (2007a, b) introduced a scalar–tensor model they call Cuscuton that is based on the infinite sound speed limit of k-essence model fluid (Armendáriz-Picón et al. 1999).”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Afshordi et al. 2007a, b

  • Afshordi et al. (2007a) show Cuscuton model is causal and perturbations do not introduce additional dynamical degree of freedom but obey only a constraint equation.

    “Afshordi et al. (2007a) show that Cuscuton model is causal and perturbations do not introduce any additional dynamical degree of freedom but just obey only a constraint equation.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Afshordi et al. 2007a

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Afshordi, N., Chung, D. J. H., Doran, M., & Geshnizjani, G.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2007-06-13
Volume
75
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W1990793615
Cited by
129
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
cuscuton, scalar field dark energy, k-essence, modified gravity, constraint equations, dynamical degrees of freedom, early dark energy, quadratic potential, exponential potential, integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect, cosmic microwave background, Lyman-alpha forest, cosmological constant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review