The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cosmology of modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity
Open accessAbstract
We consider the cosmology where some function $f(G)$ of the Gauss-Bonnet term $G$ is added to the gravitational action to account for the late-time accelerating expansion of the universe. The covariant and gauge invariant perturbation equations are derived with a method which could also be applied to general $f(R,{R}^{ab}{R}_{ab},{R}^{abcd}{R}_{abcd})$ gravitational theories. It is pointed out that, despite their fourth-order character, such $f(G)$ gravity models generally cannot reproduce arbitrary background cosmic evolutions; for example, the standard $\ensuremath{\Lambda}\mathrm{CDM}$ paradigm with ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{\mathrm{DE}}=0.76$ cannot be realized in $f(G)$ gravity theories unless $f$ is a true cosmological constant because it imposes exclusionary constraints on the form of $f(G)$. We analyze the perturbation equations and find that, as in the $f(R)$ model, the stability of early-time perturbation growth puts some constraints on the functional form of $f(G)$, in this case ${\ensuremath{\partial}}^{2}f/\ensuremath{\partial}{G}^{2}<0$. Furthermore, the stability of small-scale perturbations also requires that $f$ not deviate significantly from a constant. These analyses are illustrated by numerically propagating the perturbation equations with a specific model reproducing a representative $\ensuremath{\Lambda}\mathrm{CDM}$ cosmic history. Our results show how the $f(G)$ models are highly constrained by cosmological data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Three‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Implications for Cosmology
Spergel, D. N., Bean, R., Dore, O., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Dunkley, J., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Komatsu, E., Page, L., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/513700 · Cited by 6,778
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
MODIFIED GRAVITATIONAL THEORIES AND COSMIC ACCELERATION
EASSON, D. A. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x04022578 · Cited by 124
Cited by
Harko, T., Lobo, F. S. N., Nojiri, S., & Odintsov, S. D. (2011) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.024020 · Cited by 2,772
Modified gravity theories on a nutshell: Inflation, bounce and late-time evolution
Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S. D., & Oikonomou, V. K. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.06.001 · Cited by 2,734
Bamba, K., Capozziello, S., Nojiri, S., & Odintsov, S. D. (2012) · Astrophysics and Space Science · doi:10.1007/s10509-012-1181-8 · Cited by 2,387
Testing general relativity in cosmology
Ishak, M. (2019) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4 · Cited by 449
Bamba, K., Odintsov, S. D., Sebastiani, L., & Zerbini, S. (2010) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1292-8 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, B., Barrow, J. D., & Mota, D. F.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-08-30
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2098593734
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cosmology of modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.76.044027
- The paper
- Li, B., Barrow, J. D., & Mota, D. F. (2007). Cosmology of modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.76.044027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.