Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New PVLAS results and limits on magnetically induced optical rotation and ellipticity in vacuum

Open access
Zavattini, E., Zavattini, G., Ruoso, G., Raiteri, G., Polacco, E., Milotti, E., Lozza, V., Karuza, M., Gastaldi, U., Di Domenico, G., Della Valle, F., Cimino, R., Carusotto, S., Cantatore, G., Bregant, M.·2008·Physical Review D

Abstract

In 2006 the PVLAS collaboration reported the observation of an optical rotation generated in vacuum by a magnetic field. To further check against possible instrumental artifacts, several upgrades to the PVLAS apparatus have been made during the past year. Two data taking runs, at the wavelength of 1064 nm, have been performed in the new configuration with magnetic field strengths of 2.3 and 5 T. The 2.3 T field value was chosen in order to avoid stray fields. The new observations do not show the presence of a rotation signal down to the levels of $1.2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}8}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{rad}$ at 5 T and $1.0\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}8}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{rad}$ at 2.3 T (at 95% C.L.) with 45 000 passes in the magnetic field zone. In the same conditions no ellipticity signal was detected down to $1.4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}8}$ at 2.3 T (at 95% C.L.), whereas at 5 T a signal is still present. The physical nature of this ellipticity as due to an effect depending on ${B}^{2}$ can be excluded by the measurement at 2.3 T. These new results completely exclude the previously published magnetically induced vacuum dichroism results, indicating that they were instrumental artifacts. These new results therefore also exclude the particle interpretation of the previous PVLAS results as due to a spin-zero boson. The background ellipticity at 2.3 T can be used to determine a new limit on the total photon-photon scattering cross section of ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}}<4.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}34}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{barn}$ at 95% C.L.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.77.032006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 238

Metadata

Authors
Zavattini, E., Zavattini, G., Ruoso, G., Raiteri, G., Polacco, E., Milotti, E., Lozza, V., Karuza, M., Gastaldi, U., Di Domenico, G., Della Valle, F., Cimino, R., Carusotto, S., Cantatore, G., & Bregant, M.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2008-02-29
Volume
77
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2112922831
Cited by
238
References
1
FWCI
14.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New PVLAS results and limits on magnetically induced optical rotation and ellipticity in vacuum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.77.032006
The paper
Zavattini, E., Zavattini, G., Ruoso, G., Raiteri, G., Polacco, E., Milotti, E., Lozza, V., Karuza, M., Gastaldi, U., Di Domenico, G., Della Valle, F., Cimino, R., Carusotto, S., Cantatore, G., & Bregant, M. (2008). New PVLAS results and limits on magnetically induced optical rotation and ellipticity in vacuum. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.77.032006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.