The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thawing quintessence with a nearly flat potential
Open accessAbstract
The thawing quintessence model with a nearly flat potential provides a natural mechanism to produce an equation of state parameter, $w$, close to $\ensuremath{-}1$ today. We examine the behavior of such models for the case in which the potential satisfies the slow-roll conditions: $[(1/V)(dV/d\ensuremath{\phi}){]}^{2}\ensuremath{\ll}1$ and $(1/V)({d}^{2}V/d{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{2})\ensuremath{\ll}1$, and we derive the analog of the slow-roll approximation for the case in which both matter and a scalar field contribute to the density. We show that in this limit, all such models converge to a unique relation between $1+w$, ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}$, and the initial value of $(1/V)(dV/d\ensuremath{\phi})$. We derive this relation and use it to determine the corresponding expression for $w(a)$, which depends only on the presentday values for $w$ and ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}$. For a variety of potentials, our limiting expression for $w(a)$ is typically accurate to within $\ensuremath{\delta}w\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.005$ for $w<\ensuremath{-}0.9$. For redshift $z\ensuremath{\lesssim}1$, $w(a)$ is well fit by the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder parametrization, in which $w(a)$ is a linear function of $a$.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Riess, A. G., Strolger, L., Tonry, J., Casertano, S., Ferguson, H. C., Mobasher, B., Challis, P., Filippenko, A. V., Jha, S., Li, W., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/383612 · Cited by 4,315
Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field
Ratra, B., & Peebles, P. J. E. (1988) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.3406 · Cited by 4,310
Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe
Linder, E. V. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.091301 · Cited by 2,526
Cosmological Inflation and Large-Scale Structure
Liddle, A. R., & Lyth, D. H. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175180 · Cited by 2,317
Riess, A. G., Strolger, L., Casertano, S., Ferguson, H. C., Mobasher, B., Gold, B., Challis, P. J., Filippenko, A. V., Jha, S., Li, W., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/510378 · Cited by 1,758
Exponential potentials and cosmological scaling solutions
Copeland, E. J., Liddle, A. R., & Wands, D. (1998) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.57.4686 · Cited by 1,468
Wood‐Vasey, W. M., Miknaitis, G., Stubbs, C. W., Jha, S., Riess, A. G., Garnavich, P. M., Kirshner, R. P., Aguilera, C., Becker, A. C., Blackman, J. W., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/518642 · Cited by 928
Cited by
Modified gravity theories on a nutshell: Inflation, bounce and late-time evolution
Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S. D., & Oikonomou, V. K. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.06.001 · Cited by 2,734
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Metadata
- Authors
- Scherrer, R. J., & Sen, A. A.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-04-25
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W1992720874
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 7.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.